No More Anchor Babies! (McCain, Representatives, birth, illegally)

[sassyone]

Originally Posted by Exedous

So, only Mexican anchor babies? I fail to see this correlation. In the keywords: congress, security, Mexican? Why is Mexican apart of the keywords? Have we forgotten that not just Mexicans are illegal aliens?

And the link at the bottom is an anti-illegal group. If truth be known I hardly doubt there is that much conern over any other Illegals other than Mexican, but they will continue to preach the other.

[ArizonaBear]

Originally Posted by sassyone

And the link at the bottom is an anti-illegal group. If truth be known I hardly doubt there is that much conern over any other Illegals other than Mexican, but they will continue to preach the other.

Speaking for myself: an Anchor is just that---------a US born child (of any race/ethnicity) to parents who are both here illegally.

[sassyone]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Why would the child be left behind? Children of Mexican immigrants arnt allowed into Mexico?

where did you hear that?

[High Springs Gator]

Originally Posted by barinnas

If you were born here, you had all kinds of opportunities to study, if you opted for being a laborer of whatever trade, then you are exposed to competition from the bottom up, people that are likely more motivated.
This is a market economy, and only the most competitive survive. Migrant workers with their anchor babies assure us that there is an effort being made
for the earned money.
For this reason we may all forget that there are going to be any ammendments to the constitution, we need the migrant workers with their anchor babies!

Barinnas, with that same reasoning, if American citizens want to compete with migrants, we should consider living several families to a house, not having auto insurance, using the ER's for free health care. Is that the point you are trying to get across.

[barinnas]

Originally Posted by ArizonaBear

Speaking for myself: an Anchor is just that---------a US born child (of any race/ethnicity) to parents who are both here illegally.

Anchors babies are U.S. citizes with all the rights and responsibilities that it confers, like the rest of us they are, and will be, protected by the constitution

[barinnas]

Originally Posted by High Springs Gator

Barinnas, with that same reasoning, if American citizens want to compete with migrants, we should consider living several families to a house, not having auto insurance, using the ER's for free health care. Is that the point you are trying to get across.

well mr gator, we need to make sure that our country keeps moving, whatever it takes, and the migrant workers bring a lot of energy to the work-force

[High Springs Gator]

Originally Posted by barinnas

well mr gator, we need to make sure that our country keeps moving, whatever it takes, and the migrant workers bring a lot of energy to the work-force

I prefer legal migrants. They cause less problems.

[blacknight04]

Originally Posted by ArizonaBear

I certainly do not 'need' a bunch of lawbreakers here illegally in my country.

The hammer is coming down to the illegals and their enablers.

If that annoys you so much; I am sure that you would be much happier outside the USA

You and your invisible hammer.

[ArizonaBear]

Originally Posted by barinnas

Anchors babies are U.S. citizes with all the rights and responsibilities that it confers, like the rest of us they are, and will be, protected by the constitution

Suffice to say: I will not be surprised that the Anchor Baby loophole will be closed (grandfathering in the existing ones)-------it has already occurred in both France and Ireland in just the last 15 years

[ArizonaBear]

Originally Posted by blacknight04

You and your invisible hammer.

Beware said 'invisible' hammers---------one may wind up getting nailed