Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The 14th amendment be...
Totally eliminated like Prohibition was. 4 9.52%
Modified to correct the anchor baby loophole 28 66.67%
Leave it alone 10 23.81%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2010, 09:21 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Should the 14th Amendment be eliminated, like Prohibition was, or should it stand as it is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2010, 05:53 AM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,854 posts, read 4,835,857 times
Reputation: 960
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Should the 14th Amendment be eliminated, like Prohibition was, or should it stand as it is
Why would it be eliminated? it can be "amended" if it is done by the terms outlined in the Constitution. The Constutition is a living document [not set in stone]. The 14th will be amended if the people want it to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:29 AM
 
1,474 posts, read 2,299,945 times
Reputation: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan View Post
Why would it be eliminated? it can be "amended" if it is done by the terms outlined in the Constitution. The Constutition is a living document [not set in stone]. The 14th will be amended if the people want it to be.
nope, not what the people want, just hat the feds want, unless the states take it over..........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:44 AM
 
Location: ...at a 3AM epiphany
2,205 posts, read 2,536,422 times
Reputation: 453
Stop the anchor baby loophole, it is the strongest driving force for many to come to this country, instant citizenship for their offspring-birth tourism. Stop it now and make it retroactive Parents must prove they are American citizens before a BC is issued to their newborn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 07:52 AM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,749,891 times
Reputation: 3022
The vast majority of industrialized nations in the world no longer allow birthright citizenship. Why we continue to allow it is beyond me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 01:10 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan View Post
Why would it be eliminated? it can be "amended" if it is done by the terms outlined in the Constitution. The Constutition is a living document [not set in stone]. The 14th will be amended if the people want it to be.

Even the 18th amendment still stands in the books.
The amendment basically made it null and void.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 01:22 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,271,551 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
The vast majority of industrialized nations in the world no longer allow birthright citizenship. Why we continue to allow it is beyond me.

huh? 33 nations in the world allow birthright citizenship

Jus Soli
* Antigua and Barbuda
* Argentina
* Barbados
* Belize
* Bolivia
* Brazil
* Canada
* Chile
* Colombia
* Dominica
* Dominican Republic
* Ecuador
* El Salvador
* Fiji
* Grenada
* Guatemala
* Guyana
* Honduras
* Jamaica
* Lesotho
* Malaysia
* Mexico
* Nicaragua
* Pakistan
* Panama
* Paraguay
* Peru
* Saint Christopher and Nevis
* Saint Lucia
* Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
* Trinidad and Tobago
* United States
* Uruguay
* Venezuela


These countries operate on a modified form of Jus Soli (requirement that the parent who may be foreign, has lived in the country for a time, or become a permanent resident - note, nothing about being illegal in the country; only that they are in the country and living there for a time):

* United Kingdom
* Australia
* Republic of Ireland
* New Zealand
* South Africa
* France


Lots of industrialized countries in this list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 01:45 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,318,817 times
Reputation: 2136
Most countries ban birthright citizenship because of security threats and because of unbearable costs which take invaluable resources and burden federal, state and local budgets and taxpayers.U.S. Representative Nathan Deal of Georgia, who introduced H.R. 1868 to ban automatic birthright citizenship, stated that the United States is the largest of only 33 countries in the world that grant automatic birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors, while 122 countries do not.

To reiterate, 122 COUNTRIES DO NOT GRANT AUTOMATIC BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP compared to 33 that do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 01:48 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,271,551 times
Reputation: 1837
33 industrialized countries. Why dont you help change those countries first before attempting to Change the US 's issue with citizenship?

yeah 122 countries that do not; but those countries include Iran - who treats women as 2nd class citizens and property;
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 02:08 PM
 
Location: central Oregon
1,909 posts, read 2,538,772 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
33 industrialized countries. Why dont you help change those countries first before attempting to Change the US 's issue with citizenship?

yeah 122 countries that do not; but those countries include Iran - who treats women as 2nd class citizens and property;
Why would American citizens want to change birth right laws in OTHER countries? We want it changed in OUR COUNTRY. What other countries do is NOT our concern.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top