U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2010, 03:44 AM
 
34,990 posts, read 33,881,609 times
Reputation: 6156

Advertisements

TUCSON, Ariz. — The city of Tucson has joined a lawsuit by one of its police officers to block Arizona's immigration enforcement law.
***
[The suit] alleges the new law violates numerous constitutional rights, could hinder some police investigations, and violates federal law because Tucson police and the city have no authority to perform immigration duties.

The Associated Press: AZ city joins officer's suit over immigration law
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2010, 07:17 AM
 
Location: San Diego
32,823 posts, read 30,091,418 times
Reputation: 17698
Ironic isn't it. Escobar probably has a slew of relatives here illegally and he's going to chump out rather than perform his duties. PS CA is already doing what everyone is whining about in AZ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 07:45 AM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,855 posts, read 4,089,287 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Ironic isn't it. Escobar probably has a slew of relatives here illegally and he's going to chump out rather than perform his duties. PS CA is already doing what everyone is whining about in AZ.
Do you mean San Diego? or Ca? What is the law called? Or are they just particpating in the 287(g) program? Because unless San Deigo/Ca has a city ordinance/ state law which make it a crime[city/state] to be in this country without documentation, they did not do what Arizona did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 08:04 AM
 
14,307 posts, read 11,157,849 times
Reputation: 2130
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Ironic isn't it. Escobar probably has a slew of relatives here illegally and he's going to chump out rather than perform his duties. PS CA is already doing what everyone is whining about in AZ.
"Escobar" well that pretty much says it all, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 08:06 AM
 
Location: ...at a 3AM epiphany
2,206 posts, read 2,139,789 times
Reputation: 453
These cretins will be voted out.

tick tock...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 08:10 AM
 
364 posts, read 184,629 times
Reputation: 79
many ppl in tuscon
want ilegals gone
so tha head cop dont
he needs to do his job
or bee replacd
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 08:52 AM
 
Location: San Diego
32,823 posts, read 30,091,418 times
Reputation: 17698
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan View Post
Do you mean San Diego? or Ca? What is the law called? Or are they just particpating in the 287(g) program? Because unless San Deigo/Ca has a city ordinance/ state law which make it a crime[city/state] to be in this country without documentation, they did not do what Arizona did.
287, how is it different than what AZ is trying to pass? The SDPD can make an arrest and call BP or ICE. No difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 09:00 AM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,855 posts, read 4,089,287 times
Reputation: 957
because you dont know the difference doesnt mean there is not a difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 09:04 AM
 
Location: San Diego
32,823 posts, read 30,091,418 times
Reputation: 17698
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1751texan View Post
because you dont know the difference doesnt mean there is not a difference.

Semantics, plain and simple. http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sd...3655b4465.html

It should pass all muster.

I still say you'll flop on it if the US Constitution gets modified, ak the 14th anchor baby loophole because as most Pro-Illegals do, if the law doesn't suit them, to them the law becomes an unjust law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2010, 01:55 PM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,855 posts, read 4,089,287 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Semantics, plain and simple. http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sd...3655b4465.html

It should pass all muster.

I still say you'll flop on it if the US Constitution gets modified, ak the 14th anchor baby loophole because as most Pro-Illegals do, if the law doesn't suit them, to them the law becomes an unjust law.
I wont flip flop in my grave, because i'll be long gone and burried before the 14th is amended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top