Quote:
Originally Posted by runninfiend
Here's the way it stacks up as I see it:
North of I-80: 85% Cubs, 15% Sox
South of I-80 to Peoria: 50% Cubs, 47% Cardinals, 3% Sox
South of Peoria including Springfield: 80% Cardinals, 20% Cubs, Chicago has two baseball teams?
South of Springfield to St. Louis: 95% Cardinals, 5% Cubs
South of St. Louis to Cairo: 10% Cardinals, 10% Braves, 80% Dale Earnhardt, Jr.
Myself, sorry, no use for the yuppie northsiders. Born, raised, still, a Cardinal fan.
|
I grew up in the south suburbs, so I'm a huge White Sox fan.
Here's my take (and I'm saying all this as a Sox fan that takes a perverse joy in seeing the Cubs reach 100 years without a World Series championship): I definitely believe that Cubs fans outnumber Sox fans in terms of people who GREW UP in the Chicago area, but I think it's more of 60-40 split there as opposed to the 85-15 figure suggested. The difference is that the Cubs have a huge adoptability factor among transplants that only a few other teams in all of sports can match (probably only the Yankees, Red Sox, Lakers and Cowboys can compare) - basically, unless you grew up as a Cardinals or White Sox fan, it seems as though every person that moves into Chicago from outside of the area ends up adopting the Cubs as their baseball team. We can argue all day as to why that has happened, but it is what it is (and keeps Wrigley Field completely sold out even in sub-.500 seasons). Even though the Bears are the #1 team in Chicago overall, most transplants seem to keep their original NFL teams with only a passing interest in the Bears. On the other hand, I can't tell you how many Wisconsin natives that I've met that have moved to Chicago and ended up with a love of both the Packers (which means an obvious hatred for the Bears) and the Cubs. This is the same thing for people that move in from other places (i.e. the Cowboys/Cubs fan, the Lions/Cubs fan, the Browns/Cubs fan - I've seen them all). Taking into account the newer residents, it probably jumps up to 70-30 in favor of the Cubs.
Spending enough time in central Illinois during my college years, I think the split between Cubs and Cardinals fans in downstate Illinois is much closer than what is suggested here, as well. Springfield tips slightly toward the Cardinals (definitely not 80-20 - maybe 55-45 if not closer), while Peoria tips slightly towards the Cubs. As you get closer to Chicago or St. Louis, the split between the two respective teams becomes greater. I'd have to agree that the Sox fan base doesn't extend much beyond the South Side and I'm fine with that - few things perturb me more than bandwagon fans.
I'll give the TRUE Cubs fans credit for sitcking by them (these people are different than what I call the "Wrigley Field fans" who just want to party) - it can't necessarily be true that Wrigley Field is the only reason why people watch the Cubs because there are few pro sports teams that have a traveling fan base the way they do. I'll never forget how they dominated the Braves fans in the 2003 playoffs in Turner Field - I'll admit that was impressive.