U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Indiana > Indianapolis
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 06-09-2011, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL SouthWest Suburbs
3,531 posts, read 1,744,228 times
Reputation: 6058
Quote:
Originally Posted by prairiestate View Post
It will never happen. If you were to visit one, they require custom built stores that include a large warehouse. In addition, Ikea is extremely picky about site selection. It took them nearly a decade to find just the right site in the Denver area. They aren't going to wooed by a developer, even one as large as Simon.
ikea does always seem to be in suburbia
they do need vast amounts of room and huge parking areas
if i remember correct the ikea in bb has a land for cars to back up and pick up the merchandise.
but who knows meijer and target have both downsized their foot print for city areas maybe it is a trend that will go ikeas way too
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 06-09-2011, 02:03 PM
 
1,098 posts, read 1,196,415 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyandcloudydays View Post
ikea does always seem to be in suburbia
they do need vast amounts of room and huge parking areas
if i remember correct the ikea in bb has a land for cars to back up and pick up the merchandise.
but who knows meijer and target have both downsized their foot print for city areas maybe it is a trend that will go ikeas way too
Theoretically, it could work. But if Ikea were to do that, they would have already made a press release about trying a new store concept (just as JC Penney and Macy's made press releases about their new strip center/lifestyle store concepts)...Also, they would most likely start in a more progressive (in terms of design) city like Portland, Seattle, Austin, or even Chicago and NY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-09-2011, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL SouthWest Suburbs
3,531 posts, read 1,744,228 times
Reputation: 6058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwest Indiana View Post
Theoretically, it could work. But if Ikea were to do that, they would have already made a press release about trying a new store concept (just as JC Penney and Macy's made press releases about their new strip center/lifestyle store concepts)...Also, they would most likely start in a more progressive (in terms of design) city like Portland, Seattle, Austin, or even Chicago and NY.
agree with you totally nwi i was just typing and thinking
and while we are on that subject ikea being an euoro based biz
you would think they would not have such a large store
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-09-2011, 02:18 PM
 
1,098 posts, read 1,196,415 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyandcloudydays View Post
agree with you totally nwi i was just typing and thinking
and while we are on that subject ikea being an euoro based biz
you would think they would not have such a large store
True, but the store is pretty large because they have a half warehouse/half showroom store model. This way, they can operate less storefronts (which is more efficient).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-09-2011, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
1,266 posts, read 949,776 times
Reputation: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by chalcedony View Post
While I'd agree with you that Greenwood city limits is mostly lower middle class (in other words, solidly middle of the middle), I'm baffled at how you'd come to the conclusion that it is in decline. Granted, it's not 105% white like it used to be, but it seems to be pretty darn stable to me. Greenwood Park Mall is, if anything, a bit ritzier than it was in the 1990s. The idea of a Coach or Sephora or White House/Black Market (or a Cheesecake Factory, for that matter) would have been unthinkable for the south side 15 years ago.
I personally don't really appreciate the fact that you choose to say that Greenwood's percentage of white residents has any part to do with its level of class. Carmel is less white than Greenwood and a whole lot wealthier. And before people say Carmel is more diverse than Greenwood because of Indians and Asians, it also has more blacks than Greenwood.

And I'm not really saying that it's a racist comment at all, I just think it perpetuates a negative stereotype that the whiter the city, the better, safer, and wealthier it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-10-2011, 05:37 AM
 
1,098 posts, read 1,196,415 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by wh15395 View Post
I personally don't really appreciate the fact that you choose to say that Greenwood's percentage of white residents has any part to do with its level of class. Carmel is less white than Greenwood and a whole lot wealthier. And before people say Carmel is more diverse than Greenwood because of Indians and Asians, it also has more blacks than Greenwood.

And I'm not really saying that it's a racist comment at all, I just think it perpetuates a negative stereotype that the whiter the city, the better, safer, and wealthier it is.
I think that "chalcedony" was not implying that a city has to be White in order to be stable...I think he/she was just bringing up the fact that the vast majority of people BELIEVE that Greenwood may have gone downhill due to some "diversification" (hence why they sarcastically put 105%). In other words, it was probably a response to another post and nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-10-2011, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
1,266 posts, read 949,776 times
Reputation: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwest Indiana View Post
I think that "chalcedony" was not implying that a city has to be White in order to be stable...I think he/she was just bringing up the fact that the vast majority of people BELIEVE that Greenwood may have gone downhill due to some "diversification" (hence why they sarcastically put 105%). In other words, it was probably a response to another post and nothing more.
Yeah, I agree. I also thought it may have read that way. I wasn't really speaking about her/him personally, just the thought that many people view "diversification" as causing communities to go downhill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-10-2011, 12:18 PM
 
1,098 posts, read 1,196,415 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by wh15395 View Post
Yeah, I agree. I also thought it may have read that way. I wasn't really speaking about her/him personally, just the thought that many people view "diversification" as causing communities to go downhill.
Alright, I understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-10-2011, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Hither and thither
415 posts, read 516,462 times
Reputation: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northwest Indiana View Post
I think that "chalcedony" was not implying that a city has to be White in order to be stable...I think he/she was just bringing up the fact that the vast majority of people BELIEVE that Greenwood may have gone downhill due to some "diversification" (hence why they sarcastically put 105%). In other words, it was probably a response to another post and nothing more.
Bingo. I can't think of any other reason why the person from whom I originally quoted would imply that Greenwood is going downhill. It is definitely more diverse than it used to be, but it still seems to be thriving. So why would someone suggest it is in decline?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-11-2011, 04:16 AM
 
1,098 posts, read 1,196,415 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by chalcedony View Post
Bingo. I can't think of any other reason why the person from whom I originally quoted would imply that Greenwood is going downhill. It is definitely more diverse than it used to be, but it still seems to be thriving. So why would someone suggest it is in decline?
They would suggest that because every place that isn't Carmel or Zionsville is declining! Duh!

On a more serious note, a couple classmates I had have stated that while the Greenwood area as a whole is not going downhill, there seems to be major class warfare between residents in the "Center Grove HS" attendance area and the "Greenwood Community HS" attendance area. Those in the GCHS area were referred to as "trashy" and those in the CGHS area were "classy" (according to what I was told). Also, I guess it was not uncommon for people to move from GCHS to CGHS because the latter district is better? That is all I know about that. So maybe it is a within-town issue? I don't know much about the south suburbs of Indy as most of the people I know are from the north suburbs or west suburbs of Indy.

Regardless, I find it hard to believe that an area with a Cheesecake Factory and an above average mall is really going downhill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Indiana > Indianapolis
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top