Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-16-2016, 04:46 PM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164

Advertisements

not technically , that is exactly how the safe withdrawal rate is calculated .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2016, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Centennial, CO
2,276 posts, read 3,078,730 times
Reputation: 3781
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
using 28% equity's has only had an 86% success rate out to 30 years as far as maintaining 4% inflation adjusted . anything under 90% is considered unacceptable .

live 35 years in retirement and your chances of not running out of money falls to just 67% .

it failed to have anything left 1/3 of every rolling 35 year period in history .


folks , this is why you need to watch what charts and data is posted on internet forums . many times what is posted has little to do with what the poster is trying to prove because the poster is ill-informed on the subject .

below are the actual results once the sequence is included .
Mathjak, while you chart is very informative and your information useful, it is based on the assumption that the "retiree" is using ONLY withdrawal from investment accounts as his/her exclusive income source. It does not account for the potential of secondary income streams such as pensions that might kick in, social security, or part-time or temporary wage or hobby income. A person could also conceivably sell assets (downsize home, etc.) in order to not draw down all of their remaining investment pool. This could significantly prolong the timeline and reduce the failure rate of any investment strategy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 09:33 AM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
no , it is the amount of your withdrawal from your investments after you subtract other income out .

so if i need 100k and have 60k in ss and pension i need 40k from investments .

if i have 1 million dollars i need to find an allocation that meets 90% success rate for 4% .

if i need only 20k from savings and have 80k in ss and pension and have 1 million all i need is a 2% draw rate and fixed income will have an above 90% success rate .

the chart is only what you need from your portfolio
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 02:32 PM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShampooBanana View Post
Mathjak, while you chart is very informative and your information useful, it is based on the assumption that the "retiree" is using ONLY withdrawal from investment accounts as his/her exclusive income source. It does not account for the potential of secondary income streams such as pensions that might kick in, social security, or part-time or temporary wage or hobby income. A person could also conceivably sell assets (downsize home, etc.) in order to not draw down all of their remaining investment pool. This could significantly prolong the timeline and reduce the failure rate of any investment strategy.
don't forget , retirement is no different then your working years as far as how you allocate your income .

all safe withdrawal methods are based on the fact that your portfolio can be out of money based on the time frame you select .

depending on markets , rates , inflation and sequences of returns you can end up with zero to more then 2x what you started with and everything in between .

so you may want to set a side an emergency fund not part of the capital you are counting on for income . or you may want money set a side for long term care , a new car or any other major expense that exceeds budget .

so that money should be kept out of the balance when figuring out how much income you can safely generate .

but again all calculations for what you need in income are based solely on that part that has to come from your portfolio AFTER YOU SUBTRACT OUT OTHER SOURCES . it is all based on the amount of your portfolio and the money you hope to draw from it .

certain allocations at certain draw rates have already failed over and over in the past and are risky . usually going less then 35% equity's has failed way to many times in the past at 4% and ran out of money before the designated amount of years .


trying to draw more then 2% inflation adjusted with no equity's has resulted in high rates of failure ,especially trying to draw 4% . so you will need either more money to invest more conservatively or a lower draw to be that conservative .

a 40-50% mix has performed the best ..

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-18-2016 at 03:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top