Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-05-2014, 05:50 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,700,286 times
Reputation: 8798

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by darrell2525 View Post
Is having one asset allocation (AA) across multiple accounts a must?
Me and the wife have 401Ks. Her accounts have index funds and mine as well. But her has the extended total stock market index and mine only the S&P500. Its just too much hassle every year having to re balance both accounts as 1 AA. Is there something wrong with just having our AA of 80/20 set in each account and call it a day??
It need not be that difficult. You're just talking about retirement accounts. If you have lots of excellent choices in both 401ks then there's no problem having that portion of your overall portfolio asset allocation reflected by coincidentally identical account-level asset allocations.

Having said that, it is difficult for us, because we both have 401ks with very limited choices. My spouse's 401k has absolutely no good bond fund or stable-value choices. None. [My 401k sucks in a completely different way - high ERs across the board (but since it is across the board, that doesn't really inject a bias into the appropriate account-level asset allocation).] So the right answer for us, since asset placement best practice dictates putting tax-inefficient investments, like bond funds, in retirement accounts, that my 401k be almost exclusively such investments. The reality is that the bulk of the conservative side of our overall portfolio is in my 401k (and in a tIRA I opened from a 401k rollover). My spouse's 401k is actually mostly equities, again: because all the decent choices there are equity investments.

So it sounds like perhaps you're much younger than we are, so having 80% equities in retirement accounts is appropriate for you (and perhaps you don't have significant taxable investments, like we do). If that's the case, then what you're doing sounds right for you, for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2014, 12:32 PM
 
1,343 posts, read 2,670,492 times
Reputation: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
there is no real trading . maybe 2 x a year we swap a fund or two.
thanks mathjak107
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2014, 12:33 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
good luck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top