Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2015, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,930 posts, read 56,935,296 times
Reputation: 11228

Advertisements

Thanks for the thoughts. Just to be clear, the Professional Investment Group is not guaranteeing a return. They said that they were successful in providing a return even in down cycles by shifting money quickly into and out of the market. They said that even during financial crisis they got their investors a return of over 2% on their money.

I kind of thought that it is not worth it but my friend is concerned about being able to maintain the balance of the account or at least minimize the impact of a downturn. Right now the portfolio is heavy into stock funds in which they could stay and ride out a down cycle. That said they are about 10 years from retirement and getting concerned that the time period for riding out cycles is getting shorter and shorter. I will suggest the idea of a "fee only" planner. Thanks again, Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2015, 07:40 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,017,180 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
Someone I know has a fairly sizable amount of money in their 401k and needs to decide what to with it. It is now with a major investment company. They could keep it there or move it. One option is to place with a
Professional Investment group. They would charge a 1.3 percent fee. Would it be worth it? They claim to be able to protect the money and assure it grows even in a down economy. Thoughts? Jay
A) I'd avoid big firms. Independents > big firms imo. I work for a big firm.

B) If it's big enough, that 1.3% should be closer to .8% (can be hundreds of thousands, doesn't need to be millions).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big-Bucks View Post
Worth it? No. You have to understand what an adviser does. ANYBODY can buy stock and bond index funds and rebalance. Simple. You don't need to pay someone 1.3% to do that. https://pressroom.vanguard.com/conte...3.10.2014.html
They are selling snake oil. There is no such thing as growth AND safety. The two are opposites. Sounds to me like a sales pitch for an annuity. If so and they are ALSO charging to manage the money then they are double dipping. Don't even get me started on annuities.
Not everyone can go it alone. Those preaching go it alone need to understand that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Market Junkie View Post
In 2015, with so much information available at the click of a mouse, not to mention the many good books about investing available at the local bookstore, you'd literally have to be insane, in my view, to pay someone 1.3% to manage your dough...
Again, not everyone can go it alone. There are multiple factors for this, having access to information isn't necessarily a cure all for needing an advisor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
Thanks for the thoughts. Just to be clear, the Professional Investment Group is not guaranteeing a return. They said that they were successful in providing a return even in down cycles by shifting money quickly into and out of the market. They said that even during financial crisis they got their investors a return of over 2% on their money.

I kind of thought that it is not worth it but my friend is concerned about being able to maintain the balance of the account or at least minimize the impact of a downturn. Right now the portfolio is heavy into stock funds in which they could stay and ride out a down cycle. That said they are about 10 years from retirement and getting concerned that the time period for riding out cycles is getting shorter and shorter. I will suggest the idea of a "fee only" planner. Thanks again, Jay

Problem with those claims, is they could easily be picking and choosing their data that they're using. Those annuity mailings that I've seen some old folks get of "up to 18%" returns? Everyone sees the 18% returns, most miss the "up to" part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top