Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-09-2016, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,237,495 times
Reputation: 27861

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
What's out of whack is that the Fed has artificially levitating the stock market by printing $trillions of dollars. Everyone knows this. Now they've stopped. Regression to the mean is inevitable. Of course, it will overshoot in the opposite direction and socks will become cheap. Now they are expensive. If you stay in the market you are basically betting that the Fed will once again print $trillions of dollars to the detriment of worldwide economies
That is exactly right. Anyone who thinks stocks were never going to correct, is a fool.
All the market needed was for the fed to stop printing, and for interest rates to start moving in the wrong (UP) direction - which they are going to continue to do. Not to mention all of the other negatives out there - including the fact that we are overdue for a recession.


The party is over people. Doesn't bother me in the least. Other than a little dabbling here and there, I'm out of stocks until we get to more reasonable levels. For those near retirement I suggest cashing out of stocks and moving into bonds or safer investments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2016, 04:19 AM
 
106,529 posts, read 108,647,625 times
Reputation: 80043
bonds safer ? don't bet on it .

they had negative real return last year and barely had any return the year before .

they may be more risky then stocks as rates normalize and inflation creeps up .

retirees should stick to their regular allocations with the long term money not needed to eat for 20-30 years just as it always has been invested .

trying to time things as to when to be in or out is a fools game .

just following the market cycles has worked just fine for more than 146 years whether it was the great depression , the world wars or every other world shaking event .


i would sooner bet on what was , what has been and what stands a reasonably good chance of continuing then the doomsdayer advice of "RUN" and bet the ranch on bonds only .

RUN has left folks a lot poorer then stay the course has and that has held true over every accumulation or retirement time frame ever in this country . .

Last edited by mathjak107; 01-09-2016 at 04:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 08:45 AM
 
3,076 posts, read 5,645,007 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
The indexes suffered their worse first week loss in history. A bit worse than 2008. I think the Fed should be congratulated for how nimbly and gracefully they manage the Bubbles they create.

There is absolutely nothing like having an economy managed by a bunch of Banker twits.
Oh, don't worry it isn't the Fed's fault, they can easily find a way to blame someone or someplace else for the bubbles they helped create.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,625,272 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingMA View Post
Oh, don't worry it isn't the Fed's fault, they can easily find a way to blame someone or someplace else for the bubbles they helped create.
The twits at the Fed don't create Bubbles. They just print play money for the Billionaire Class. It's the Billionaire Class that creates Bubbles. A fine, but important distinction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 09:07 AM
 
2,806 posts, read 3,174,283 times
Reputation: 2703
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
bonds safer ? don't bet on it .

they had negative real return last year and barely had any return the year before .

they may be more risky then stocks as rates normalize and inflation creeps up .

retirees should stick to their regular allocations with the long term money not needed to eat for 20-30 years just as it always has been invested .

trying to time things as to when to be in or out is a fools game .

just following the market cycles has worked just fine for more than 146 years whether it was the great depression , the world wars or every other world shaking event .


i would sooner bet on what was , what has been and what stands a reasonably good chance of continuing then the doomsdayer advice of "RUN" and bet the ranch on bonds only .

RUN has left folks a lot poorer then stay the course has and that has held true over every accumulation or retirement time frame ever in this country . .
I think this is spot on. In addition the equity risk premium is >6% and the S&P500 divi yield is above the 10 year treasury yield. That's historically cheap for stocks. While s/t sentiment is not yet as washed out as at the August / September lows and the first 1-2 months after the FED initiates a rate hike are volatile, so it will probably go lower here the mid to long-term prospects are still good for stocks IMO. I find bargains in health care in particular, but also elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2016, 11:59 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,745,338 times
Reputation: 16993
I sold healthcare couple weeks ago, I think when the stock market jumped up. Sheer luck. I finally bought back some at maybe 5-8% discount in my Roth IRA. I think it will go down some more, but at least had I stayed I would have been down more.

Last edited by NewbieHere; 01-09-2016 at 01:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2016, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,736 posts, read 5,037,035 times
Reputation: 9159
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
What's out of whack is that the Fed has artificially levitating the stock market by printing $trillions of dollars. Everyone knows this. Now they've stopped. Regression to the mean is inevitable. Of course, it will overshoot in the opposite direction and socks will become cheap. Now they are expensive. If you stay in the market you are basically betting that the Fed will once again print $trillions of dollars to the detriment of worldwide economies
No, I'm betting that the companies I own will be notably more profitable ten and twenty years from now, and that I'm not paying a crazy price today. If you get these two thing right, nothing else matters. Yes there will be volatility along the way. I don't know when the next 20% correction will happen and I don't care.

We are nowhere close to year 2000 stock valuations today, at least in the big cap stocks. At one point in 2000 the biggest company (by market cap) traded at more than 100x earnings. Today the biggest company trades at 10x earnings.

The Shiler indicator is too pessimistic, and I encourage everyone to not pay much attention to it, or him. Even at the bottom of 2009 his indicator was saying that stocks were just fairly valued, and Shiller stated that stocks typically undershoot the average. In reality, stocks were insanely cheap. It was a once or twice in a lifetime chance to buy silly cheap stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2016, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,625,272 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by hikernut View Post
No, I'm betting that the companies I own will be notably more profitable ten and twenty years from now, and that I'm not paying a crazy price today. If you get these two thing right, nothing else matters. Yes there will be volatility along the way. I don't know when the next 20% correction will happen and I don't care.

We are nowhere close to year 2000 stock valuations today, at least in the big cap stocks. At one point in 2000 the biggest company (by market cap) traded at more than 100x earnings. Today the biggest company trades at 10x earnings.

The Shiler indicator is too pessimistic, and I encourage everyone to not pay much attention to it, or him. Even at the bottom of 2009 his indicator was saying that stocks were just fairly valued, and Shiller stated that stocks typically undershoot the average. In reality, stocks were insanely cheap. It was a once or twice in a lifetime chance to buy silly cheap stocks.
Well at least we're calling it a bet and not an investment anymore.

Betting and gambling, especially with resident money, is nothing something I encourage, but I'm sure the government world love it if everyone added Powerball to n their diversified portfolio.

Place your bets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2016, 07:33 AM
 
106,529 posts, read 108,647,625 times
Reputation: 80043
Quote:
Originally Posted by hikernut View Post
No, I'm betting that the companies I own will be notably more profitable ten and twenty years from now, and that I'm not paying a crazy price today. If you get these two thing right, nothing else matters. Yes there will be volatility along the way. I don't know when the next 20% correction will happen and I don't care.

We are nowhere close to year 2000 stock valuations today, at least in the big cap stocks. At one point in 2000 the biggest company (by market cap) traded at more than 100x earnings. Today the biggest company trades at 10x earnings.

The Shiler indicator is too pessimistic, and I encourage everyone to not pay much attention to it, or him. Even at the bottom of 2009 his indicator was saying that stocks were just fairly valued, and Shiller stated that stocks typically undershoot the average. In reality, stocks were insanely cheap. It was a once or twice in a lifetime chance to buy silly cheap stocks.
as wall as the accounting on the shiller cape has changed enough over the years to be not comparable to the historical numbers and meanings
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2016, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Victory Mansions, Airstrip One
6,736 posts, read 5,037,035 times
Reputation: 9159
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
Well at least we're calling it a bet and not an investment anymore.

Betting and gambling, especially with resident money, is nothing something I encourage, but I'm sure the government world love it if everyone added Powerball to n their diversified portfolio.

Place your bets.
Yes, place your bets. Betting on cash and bonds will likely result in a loss of buying power over the next ten years. Betting on the Schiller PE is a poor idea. Gold? Oil? Making money in commodities is very difficult and risky.

I'll take my stocks, thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top