Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2016, 11:51 AM
 
30,894 posts, read 36,937,375 times
Reputation: 34516

Advertisements

There are pundits who say all kinds of things about the stock market and they're saying stuff all the time. It's nice to hear their opinions from time to time, but it's usually best to tune them out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2016, 01:19 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
I've learned not to look at PE ratio, that's for amateur investors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 01:55 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
you have to look at the whole picture . this bull market is going in to 8 years . typically we have a 20% -50% drop just about every 7 years .

so it is not as much as stocks are expensive as they are running out of steam .

dividends are up almost 38% . we have quite a few major s&p 500 company's paying out more in dividends than they earned .

basically these company's are saying here is your money back we just can't grow it .

they are doing very little capital spending to improve future productivity or increase market share .

what money they tend to spend has been going for stock buy backs not growing the business's .

earnings were down overall the last 4 quarters , so now you have less earnings and more money being given back un-used , un-invested as dividends .

so at this stage you have to ask yourself is it worth 5 or 6% in returns for risking a 20-50% loss ?

that is the real issue with stocks and the questions the big stock traders are asking themselves . suddenly a treasury bond at 1.50% looks damn good lol

Last edited by mathjak107; 09-18-2016 at 03:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 02:30 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
Mathjack, if I had invested $100k at the peak in 2000. Assume I invested it all in SP500. How much did I end up in the aftermath of 2009? I don't know if there is an easy calculator to plug in numbers like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 02:33 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
i can tell you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 02:39 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
i can go jan 2000 to dec 31 2009.

1 dollar was worth .91 cents including dividends .

if we do 2000 to 2008 it was .71 cents with all dividends reinvested .

Last edited by mathjak107; 09-18-2016 at 02:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 02:47 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,750,608 times
Reputation: 16993
I was thinking near the peak in 2000 and near the low in 2009. Perhaps Mar 1, 2000 and Mar 1, 2009. Assuming one didn't time the market, but unfortunately buy in at the high and had to sell at a low. How much worse off would they be? Is it really 40% lost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2016, 02:49 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
yes , that was the s&p 500 . some index's were worse and some stocks like banks ,auto's , oil were pummeled a lot worse
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 10:32 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,207,993 times
Reputation: 3747
Bear markets don't start with the significant amount of pessimism that is out there right now. A correction? Sure, that could always happen.If you're a trader that matters; If you'
re an investor it's irrelevant.

There's plenty to like about this market. A healthy signal for stocks is the continuation of deals – there have been over $176 billion in deals over the past two weeks. Most recently was the $4.3
billion deal with Global Infrastructure Partners and Gas Natural SDG.

That and the economy is growing, albeit slowly, and 70% of companies beat earnings expectations. Valuations are not crazy either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 10:34 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
remember what beating earnings expectations means . it means if the bar is set low enough by analysts anything better than doing worse is beating earning expectations . the earning themselves are still down from what they were . p/e's go higher because earnings don't .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top