Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2017, 06:37 AM
 
698 posts, read 567,488 times
Reputation: 864

Advertisements

No, don't follow. There's nothing special about the guy. Which may be the reason for what popularity he has enjoyed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2017, 07:35 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,832,630 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
here are even the worst case scenario's we have had to date . these are the time frames the 4% rule is based on .

in the end they are all within 2% or so 30 years later .


1907 stocks returned 7.77% over the next 30 years

1929 stocks 8.19%

1937 stocks 10.12

1966 stocks 10.23

for comparison the 140 year average's were stocks 8.39

last 30 years ending dec 2016 10.46%

last 5 years are up over over 15% , the last 3 years 12% and 1 year up 23% . so you know the averages will not likely continue at this pace , when all is said and done we should come in right within that normal range as the rolling time frame reduces and levels out . guess what too , if you retired 10 years ago , even with these gains over the last 5 years , you really accumulated nothing special , 10 year returns are right in the pack at 7.54% , even a bit low so if you are living off your portfolio and think you can order the porche because you get a false sense of where you are based on the last 5 years it really would not be a good idea .

so my point is i would not treat the last 5 years as a windfall and something that can just be spent like a drunken sailor . those gains are likely going to be needed to maintain the long term normal returns as returns reduce and once again head towards reverting back to the mean ..

i think for someone living off their portfolio kitce's method for taking raises is very smart . if you are not living off your portfolio and have other income do as you like , it is irrelevant what you spend in that case . you don't have to concerned about taking a pay cut if you over spend the portfolio .
The figures you quote are what--
Total stock market return?

So depending on how much and in what choices (REIT, Emerging Markets, Gold--however you are diversified)--what % of bonds to equities and what duration--your returns might be more or less==
Correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2017, 08:36 PM
 
746 posts, read 1,242,237 times
Reputation: 859
I will short the living crap out of the market with PUTS and will get rich doing it. While you guys keep going with your "Dollar Cost Averaging". LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky1 View Post
I will short the living crap out of the market with PUTS and will get rich doing it. While you guys keep going with your "Dollar Cost Averaging". LOL
Um, just curious. How are you going to short the market with puts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
16,269 posts, read 10,395,161 times
Reputation: 27575
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
where their idea of doing something is watching a high school game , walking in the woods or fishing .
You just described the things I plan to do in retirement. Well that and golf, now that's an expensive hobby.

I have never been a big fan of a large cash reserve. But as I draw closer to retirement age, and as the bull market continues, I am thinking 2 years worth of living expenses in cash is probably going to be a good idea. I have to figure there's a good chance a bear market will hit and may be continuing into my first few years of retirement. I like the idea of drawing from the cash reserve to buy time for the market to recover.

Last edited by DaveinMtAiry; 11-14-2017 at 12:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 04:58 PM
 
746 posts, read 1,242,237 times
Reputation: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post
Um, just curious. How are you going to short the market with puts?
Google it, I'm not your teacher
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 05:15 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,832,630 times
Reputation: 25341
Early Warnings Of A Stock Slip | Wealth Management
Suggestion market might be showing its meeting headwinds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 05:33 PM
 
18,042 posts, read 15,639,191 times
Reputation: 26758
I'm expecting it or at least wouldn't be surprised with slippage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,090,819 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky1 View Post
Google it, I'm not your teacher
Ha, you're not an options trader either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2017, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Near the beach
599 posts, read 276,222 times
Reputation: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by hikernut View Post
Any rule of thumb is completely useless, IMO.

Some folks will get by on far, far less than their working gross income. FICA withholding is gone. Mortgage is paid off at retirement. No longer putting 10%-20% or more into retirement account. Kids are no longer a financial drag (theoretically, anyway). They are going to volunteer, walk the dog, garden, and just relax in retirement. I can see these people living nicely on half of their working gross income.

Then of course we have the flip side of that. Someone who still has a mortgage in retirement, never had kids, and plans to do things in retirement that cost lots of money. Twice their gross may not be enough in that case.
This ^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top