Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-17-2018, 07:22 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,207,993 times
Reputation: 3747

Advertisements

I would never buy gold stocks. So much work.

To thrive with gold you must time - both in and out - near perfectly, or be content with long periods of losing results. It goes sideways and down for very long periods, then skyrockets and then again disappoints. Not for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2018, 07:27 AM
 
106,569 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i would never buy gold stocks either as they are still stocks and behave like stocks . but gold bullion etf's are a different story . you just buy them and rebalance with your portfolio and done , they are 100% gold holdings and not subject to earnings , strikes , etc like gold stocks are . clearly holding the gold through good and bad times has done better over a full cycle , than just equities and bonds even though gold spends most of it's time sleeping or down .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
7,642 posts, read 4,589,722 times
Reputation: 12698
Ive long used ABX as my gold hedge. To be honest, it hasn't worked nearly in the way MJ has described. His method is better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 08:54 AM
 
106,569 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
rebalancing is key .

stocks do not do as well when you rebalance because they are up more than they are down by more than 2x , as well as you rebalance usually in to bonds which do not have the ability to equal stocks gain when it is their day i the sun . .

gold does nothing or is cheaper for longer periods of time but when it moves it can be as powerful as equities are .

so you can really reduce your costs over time and then the run ups are usually very powerful .

without rebalancing it would not work well .

you can see the very powerful moves last time stocks were down .

2008 gld up 4.50%
2009 -gld up 24%
2010 gld up 30%
2011 --gld 9.57
2012 gld 6.60
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 09:24 AM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,108,628 times
Reputation: 18603
Yes gold had big increases after 2008. If you look at that it is possible to conclude that gold is a hedge against a future drop in the markets. Unfortunately that logic is thin, thin, thin. Gold has been pretty flat for other market drops including 2000. Aside from after 2008, the last surge was in the late 1970s and that was not related to the stock market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 09:53 AM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,207,993 times
Reputation: 3747
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
rebalancing is key .

stocks do not do as well when you rebalance because they are up more than they are down by more than 2x , as well as you rebalance usually in to bonds which do not have the ability to equal stocks gain when it is their day i the sun . .

gold does nothing or is cheaper for longer periods of time but when it moves it can be as powerful as equities are .

so you can really reduce your costs over time and then the run ups are usually very powerful .

without rebalancing it would not work well .

you can see the very powerful moves last time stocks were down .

2008 gld up 4.50%
2009 -gld up 24%
2010 gld up 30%
2011 --gld 9.57
2012 gld 6.60
Right if your timing is impeccable you'd be able to make some gains, just like any other sector...

For example, did you load up on US tech stocks in the early and mid-1990s? Then, did you short tech in March 2000?

Did you short global stocks in 2001, then buy them back in March 2003 and hold them through 2007?

Did you buy oil, another commodity, in January 2007, right before its last steep surge, and sell in July 2008?

Did you buy emerging market stocks in Autumn 2008? Or developed country stocks in early 2009, when sentiment was black? Did you sell the euro and buy dollars in April 2008, then reverse that in March 2009?

If you didn't time those right - pretty big, significant swings - what makes you think you can get in and out of gold right?

Amazingly, many normal people - who never, ever would think they could time the stock market, bond market, pork bellies or currencies - are content to own gold thinking it is 'safe'. To them I say it's just a commodity, volatile like any other. There is nothing golden about gold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 10:50 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,545,565 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREE866 View Post
Right if your timing is impeccable you'd be able to make some gains, just like any other sector...

For example, did you load up on US tech stocks in the early and mid-1990s? Then, did you short tech in March 2000?

Did you short global stocks in 2001, then buy them back in March 2003 and hold them through 2007?

Did you buy oil, another commodity, in January 2007, right before its last steep surge, and sell in July 2008?

Did you buy emerging market stocks in Autumn 2008? Or developed country stocks in early 2009, when sentiment was black? Did you sell the euro and buy dollars in April 2008, then reverse that in March 2009?

If you didn't time those right - pretty big, significant swings - what makes you think you can get in and out of gold right?

Amazingly, many normal people - who never, ever would think they could time the stock market, bond market, pork bellies or currencies - are content to own gold thinking it is 'safe'. To them I say it's just a commodity, volatile like any other. There is nothing golden about gold.
You're talking about market timing. That's not the same thing as rebalancing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 12:06 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,108,628 times
Reputation: 18603
I guess Mathjak moved on, but in all fairness, I believe Mathjak is promoting rebalancing using the golden butterfly or similar portfolios with a 20-30% allocations of gold and TLT. The theory is those holdings should offset any major drops in the stock market. Certainly looking back at 2008 that would have been a great strategy. Unfortunately that strategy would not have worked well in the past 5 years. In addition to the long wait for any potential benefit, it does not seem that historically gold did well with market crashes. 2008 may have been more the exception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 12:30 PM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,545,565 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkliny View Post
Unfortunately that strategy would not have worked well in the past 5 years. In addition to the long wait for any potential benefit, it does not seem that historically gold did well with market crashes. 2008 may have been more the exception.
I think 5 years is too small of a time period to compare the performance of any portfolio, especially when those 5 years have been a bull market. Otherwise, the conclusion is that everyone should be in 100% equity, 100% of the time.

Personally, I think a period that includes multiple bull and bear markets would be more informative. I like 30-year comparisons, since it aligns with mortgage lengths.

Last edited by Mr. Zero; 08-17-2018 at 12:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2018, 12:50 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,108,628 times
Reputation: 18603
Agreed, but using 2000 or 2008 may also be misleading
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top