Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Incorrect. Unless he controls all the inputs, all the outcomes, and The Future, it's all, at basis a bet. That is the genetic material of how the world operates. All else can only be wrong. But have a nice day.
Incorrect. Unless he controls all the inputs, all the outcomes, and The Future, it's all, at basis a bet. That is the genetic material of how the world operates. All else can only be wrong. But have a nice day.
By your definition, any act in the present, aiming for some outcome in the future, where said outcome is anything short of foreordained, is tantamount to the placing of a bet. Isn't that a bit extreme? It would imply that my going to bed tonight, is a placing of a bet on my successfully waking tomorrow morning, for otherwise I'd have spent the night-hours putting my final affairs in order, or perhaps indulging in some acute pleasure for one last time.
In a narrow definition, a bet is wild and unprincipled entry into zero-sum game, where there are (at least) two antagonists, such that for somebody to win, somebody else has to lose. This is fundamentally untrue about the stock market, for in the "long run", ALL investors who go "long" in a broad index, win. The only ones who lose, are (1) those who hold stocks "short", (2) those who enter into derivative contracts, and (3) those whose holding-period is too brief.
To reiterate, the beauty of capital markets that all serious participants eventually win. Why then ever get nervous, exasperated, downcast or depressed?
First, because the amount by which one wins, the percentage by which one wins, may not be enough. If I make more money by growing turnips than by growing carrots, I will come to hate carrot-farming, and will condemn myself for having ever gotten into the carrot-business. I will envy the turnip-growers as being smarter and more successful. So, if real-estate or bonds or commodities or whatever else come to outstrip the stock market over a long period of time, one feels dejected and envious.
And second, because the holding-period for finally winning, may be very long. For holders of European indices, who bought into the index in 2006-2007, that period hasn't yet come. 12 years of cumulative negative returns! Perhaps those investors should have... "bet" differently?
Without a crystal ball in effect, all he did was place bets. All the things needed for his bets to pay off happened. He looks "Smart"
Quote:
Incorrect. Unless he controls all the inputs, all the outcomes, and The Future, it's all, at basis a bet.
Fallstaff, nobody has a crystal ball, and nobody controls all the inputs and outcomes of everything. The difference between blind lucky bets and patient, long term value investing is explained here:
The difference between blind lucky bets and patient, long term value investing is explained here:
Yes, you can define anything any way you have to to get the results you want. We're all 10 ft tall if 10 ft tall is defined as "anything over 3 ft tall"
And nobody, certainly not me, has been talking about "blind lucky bets" That is a conjured term by someone to address something that was not being talked about. I guess because that's what they wanted to talk about instead. Now, that's an OK discussion to have. But it's not what I was talking about. It's a different subject.
if that was the case then ibm and heinz should never have done to buffet what they did .....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.