U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Islam
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
Old 06-12-2015, 11:56 AM
Location: Logan Township, Minnesota
15,511 posts, read 13,305,624 times
Reputation: 7407


What is always interesting are the stories of anti-Islamic people that revert to Islam. It might be just my opinion alone that here in America the people that seem to revert most often are well educated professional people that were vehemently anti-Islam. I believe the anti-Islamic sites have done much to encourage people to revert. They help keep Islam in the spot-light. A lesson I learned during a short era of writing adertisements. "It makes no difference what people say about a product, as long as they are saying something"

The story of Lason Leger is quite interesting

When posting as a MOD my posts will be in red

No advertising, no copyrighted material, no personal attacks

MODERATOR OF: Buddhism: Judaism: Paganism:

When in doubt read the TOS MOD LIST FAQ's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 06-12-2015, 12:27 PM
Location: Logan Township, Minnesota
15,511 posts, read 13,305,624 times
Reputation: 7407
Some more stories from people that were anti-Islam and reverted to Islam after investigating the allegations against Islam

When posting as a MOD my posts will be in red

No advertising, no copyrighted material, no personal attacks

MODERATOR OF: Buddhism: Judaism: Paganism:

When in doubt read the TOS MOD LIST FAQ's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-16-2015, 08:26 AM
204 posts, read 109,283 times
Reputation: 15
thanks for sharing

Do not stop the goals of the Christians of this suspicion when trying to discredit Muslims in complete human beings and her master only , and try to keep out of view from the scandals of their holy book citizenship , .

- It was not the Holy Prophet peace be upon him is the first suitors to her, but was engaged "to bin Jubair restaurant " , which shows the maturity and completeness of femininity

- Were not his sermon, peace be upon him it is not the desire of his own , but was proposing "to Khawla girl wise" to the Prophet - peace be upon him - ; so as to consolidate the link with the love of his companions , which Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him , and when he suggested they think they are suitable for marriage and filling the vacuum after the death of Khadija God bless them .

- Of medically known that puberty in the tropics will be faster than in the less heat . May reach puberty when girls in the tropics to 8 or 9 years old.

Says Dr " Duschna " - an American female doctor - "The white girl in America could begin in adulthood when the seventh or eighth , and the girl with the African descent at the sixth . It is hard medically also that the first menstrual cycle known as the ( Alminark menarche) located between the age of ninth and fifteenth . "

- That the marriage of a man of the little girl is not a new invention in that era , and in the ages following him , especially in a country that is based on the tribal system , not least because of marriage

This is shown clearly in the words of Imam Zuhri : "If the collection of science Aisha to the attention of all the mothers of the believers , and learned all the women were aware of Aisha better ," says Ata ibn Abi Rabah : " Aisha was knowledgeable people , and I know people, the best people say in public ."

- Is most surprising is the refusal of Christians to the marriage of the Prophet - peace be upon him - and she was 9 years old , more than fifty , while do not see nothing wrong that was the Virgin Mary betrothed to Joseph , the daughter of a 12 -year-old , which is more than ninety , that is The difference between them was more than seventy-eight years , as reported by the Catholic Encyclopedia .

Nor is there in their book " The Holy " is one deny the marriage of girls at the age of nine , or even a single sentence specifying the age of marriage .

Did you have to marry the son of Ahaz 10 years , and fathered a son 11 years old , it is stated in 2 Kings 2:16 : « Ahaz was twenty years old when he became king , and he reigned 16 years in Jerusalem . Word in 2 Kings 2:18 : « In the third year of Hoshea son of Elah king of Israel , King Hezekiah the son of Ahaz king of Judah . Son was 25 years old when he became king , and he reigned 29 years in Jerusalem » . Ahaz age shall be 36 years . If the king and his son, aged about 25 years old whose father had Rizk by the age of about 11 years .

He said Kshm Manis Abdel Nour in his suspicions about the Bible : " I do not mind to be between him and his father 11 years " , and taking hits historical examples , it is known that the age of maturation of females at least the age of maturation of male in the same region , it means that his wife may have been in the ninth or tenth like him, and even to give birth was valid at that age, so why deny marriage to Aisha at such an age, and your book is not denied .

How deny marriage on the beloved prophet in the time that they believe in it that the prophets have committed sins and immorality of incest weight Lot - peace be upon him - his daughters , and the weight of David 's wife soldier with his army , but ordering the army commander him if the war to kill the enemy , and have no qualms in be described by Solomon - peace be upon him - disbelief , and he worshiped idols ; to in order to satisfy his wives gentile .

[RIGHT][RIGHT]زواج الرسول من عائشة::حقائق وإحصائيات::مترجم عربي::3/1


زواج الرسول من عائشة::حقائق وإحصائيات::مترجم عربي::3/2

زواج النبي محمد من عائشه وهي في سن 9 سنوات !!!


The status was similar to that of wife. The children were exactly like the other children from the person’s legally wedded wife. They were to be given exactly the same rights as his other children. The children of the slave girl would inherit the property exactly as the other children. There was absolutely no difference amongst the children. And once any slave girl bore a child, she could not be sold to anybody else and thus became a permanent member of the household.

Then you will probably ask how is this any different from the modern days concept of a mistress/prostitution/adultery?

There is a huge difference between the slave girls of those times and the system of prostitution which is so prevalent as a disease in today’s society.

The slave girl was a social issue of the times, which if not solved by Islam would give rise to adultery and prostitution. In prostitution, the woman sells here services for a fee to anyone who is willing to pay. The slave girl was taken into a household as a full member.

In prostitution, the woman has sexual relationships with many men. The slave girl would have sexual relations only with the person she was given to; very similar to the husband-wife relationship, the only difference being that the wife came into the house through a marriage contract, and the slave girl was allotted to the person by the state.

Prostitution is a result of illegal lust, and is a huge sin in the eyes of Allah.

The allocation of slave girls was a issue of the times to envelope the woman taken as slaves in a war into the Islamic society. Prostitution and adultery do not have any responsibility attached to it. The man- woman have a one-off relationship and depart. The slave girls were a responsibility of the person, who spent on them, gave them a place to live, fed them, clothed them, and raised their children as his children.

The children from adultery and prostitution are regarded as born out of wedlock and grow up without the name and without the shadow of a father. The children of the slave girls were known as the children of the person, grew up with his other children, and had exactly the same rights and inheritance as the other offspring. The system of slave girls was accepted and respected by the Islamic society of the times. The slave girl was treated like his wife, and the children from these slave girls were treated like their children by society. No religion, no state, no moral society accepts and respects the institutions of prostitution and adultery. This is a disease of society and every moral society has tried to eradicate this disease with little success.

Despite this, it was not simply a case of forcing someone into having sex to satisfy your desires.

the Verse where Allah commands the Muslim men to not force their slave women into sex.

"Let those who find not the wherewithal for marriage keep themselves chaste, until God gives them means out of His grace. And if any of your slaves ask for a deed in writing (to enable them to earn their freedom for a certain sum), give them such a deed if ye know any good in them: yea, give them something yourselves out of the means which God has given to you. But force not your maids to prostitution when they desire chastity, in order that ye may make a gain in the goods of this life. But if anyone compels them, yet, after such compulsion, is God, Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to them), (The Noble Quran, 24:33)"

Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married.

A slave woman with whom a man has intercourse is known as a sariyyah (concubine) from the word sirr, which means marriage.

This is indicated by the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and this was done by the Prophets. Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) took Haajar as a concubine and she bore him Ismaa’eel (may peace be upon them all).

Our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) also did that, as did the Sahaabah, the righteous and the scholars. The scholars are unanimously agreed on that and it is not permissible for anyone to regard it as haraam or to forbid it. Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan girls then marry (other) women of your choice, two or three, or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or (slaves) that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing injustice”

[al-Nisa’ 4:3]
What is meant by “or (slaves) that your right hands possess” is slave women whom you own.

And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O Prophet (Muhammad)! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses — whom Allaah has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammaat (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khaal (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khaalaat (maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allaah is Ever Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful”

[al-Ahzaab 33:50]

“And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts).

Except from their wives or the (women slaves) whom their right hands possess for (then) they are not blameworthy.

But whosoever seeks beyond that, then it is those who are trespassers”
[al-Ma’aarij 70:29-31]

Al-Tabari said:

Allaah says, “And those who guard their chastity” i.e., protect their private parts from doing everything that Allaah has forbidden, but they are not to blame if they do not guard their chastity from their wives or from the female slaves whom their rights hands possess.

Tafseer al-Tabari, 29/84

Ibn Katheer said:

Taking a concubine as well as a wife is permissible according to the law of Ibraaheem (peace be upon him). Ibraaheem did that with Haajar, when he took her as a concubine when he was married to Saarah.

Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 1/383

And Ibn Katheer also said:

The phrase “and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses — whom Allaah has given to you” [al-Ahzaab 33:50] means, it is permissible for you take concubines from among those whom you seized as war booty. He took possession of Safiyyah and Juwayriyah and he freed them and married them; he took possession of Rayhaanah bint Sham’oon al-Nadariyyah and Maariyah al-Qibtiyyah, the mother of his son Ibraaheem (peace be upon them both), and they were among his concubines, may Allaah be pleased with them both.

Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 3/500

The scholars are unanimously agreed that it is permissible.

Ibn Qudaamah said:

There is no dispute (among the scholars) that it is permissible to take concubines and to have intercourse with one's slave woman, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts).

Except from their wives or the (women slaves) whom their right hands possess for (then) they are not blameworthy.”

[al-Ma’aarij 70:29-30]

Maariyah al-Qibtiyyah was the umm walad (a slave woman who bore her master a child) of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and she was the mother of Ibraaheem, the son of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), of whom he said, “Her son set her free.” Haajar, the mother of Isma’eel (peace be upon him), was the concubine of Ibraaheem the close friend (khaleel) of the Most Merciful (peace be upon him). ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allaah be pleased with him) had a number of slave women who bore him children, to each of whom he left four hundred in his will. ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) had slave women who bore him children, as did many of the Sahaabah. ‘Ali ibn al-Husayn, al-Qaasim ibn Muhammad and Saalim ibn ‘Abd-Allaah were all born from slave mothers

Al-Mughni, 10/441

Al-Shaafa’i (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts).

Except from their wives or the (women slaves) whom their right hands possess for (then) they are not blameworthy.”

[al-Ma’aarij 70:29-30]

The Book of Allaah indicates that the sexual relationships that are permitted are only of two types, either marriage or those (women slaves) whom one’s right hand possesses.


امرأة نصرانية تسأل الدكتور ذاكر عن خطيئة المرأة - ثم تسلم بعد الإجابة


The Muslim Ramadan fasting of Islam Documentary - TheDeenShow youtube

▶ جديد ذاكر نايك إذا كان الله قوياً فلماذا لا ينزل إلى الأرض بنفسه بدلاً من الأنبياء Zakr Naik - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-24-2015, 09:01 AM
204 posts, read 109,283 times
Reputation: 15
Six days from the month of Shawwaal: Abu Ayyoob Al ‘Ansaari may Allaah be pleased with him narrated that the Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allaah exalt his mention ) said: “He who fasts Ramadan and follows it with six days of Shawwaal, this is as if he fasted for the whole year.” [Ahmad, Abu Daawood and At-Tirmithi]

Three days of every month: Abu Hurayrah and Abu Tharr may Allaah be pleased with them said: “TheProphet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allaah exalt his mention ) advised us never to quit (praying) the two Rak'ahs of Ad-Dhuha, and the Witr (prayer) before going to bed (at night); and to fast three days of every month. It is desirable if these days are the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth days (of each lunar month).” [Muslim]
المقطع الذي تم حجبه في امريكا وأوروبا خوفاً من دخول الناس في الإسلام


جديد_ يسأل_ لماذا نزل القران فقط قبل 1400 سنة أليس متأخراً؟؟#Atheist

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-25-2015, 01:39 AM
Location: Not-a-Theist
3,440 posts, read 1,589,410 times
Reputation: 461
Originally Posted by lion5 View Post
- At the beginning of the Islamic Dawa
There is no fighting
Peaceful invitation to the oneness of God

Legislation to fight
Came after an polytheists attack
On the blood and symptoms and Muslim money

Kill the infidels and the polytheists in the Holy Qur'an for several specific reasons and specific conditions

If someone assaults you and kill your children and your relatives and your package from your country by force
What will you do?

This exactly happened in the time of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him
Polytheists and infidels tortured new Muslims unjustly
Killing infidels owners of the Messenger of Allah, without the right
Prevent the infidels from Muslim food and drink without the right
Infidels and take their money home without the right
Get out the infidels of Mecca, the Prophet without the right
Imagine with me all these terrible acts occurred
Only because they are Muslims
Therefore, the revelation came through Jibreel to the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him

State in the Holy Qur'an
Must fight the polytheists as mohammed they killed unduly
You mohammed you have the right to kill them.
Your view above are false.

1. Before Muhammad declared himself a warner, the Qureshi pagans, Jews and Christian were practicing their respective spirituality and religions harmoniously.

2. Then Muhammad a local guy suddenly experienced some psychological altered states of consciousness where others [not known to himself] told him he was the chosen agent of God. Note this is a common experience even at present where someone will declare himself to be selected by God when in reality it is a personal psychological issue. There is no such thing as a God chosen representative.

3. The fact is who can ever respect the local guy -Muhammad - whom most of the locals has known for 40 years to be an ordinary Joe. It is just like Donald Trump or some we know for umpteen years suddenly declaring he is chosen by God to speak on his behalf to mankind! This is why his favored uncle did not buy Muhammad's fake story from the start because he knew Muhammad inside out.

4. When Muhammad introduced his new religion and he insulted the Qureshi praying to idols and thus this started the initial antagonism. It is the Qureshi that tolerated Muhammad taunting of their religion. Obviously the Qureshi will retaliate back, i.e. we know you, the local boy next door for 40 years and now you are telling us you are the chosen one by Allah.

5. After Muhammad was rejected by the Qureshi for very obvious reasons, he tried to preach to the Jews with certain reconciliatory elements from the Torah and other stories but when he was rejected by the smarter Jews but he remained patient [due to lack of strength]. After he was rejected by the Jews he tried the Christians but he was also rejected by the Christians. After each rejection he condemned the Jews for changing and hiding certain elements. He cursed the Christians by bringing in sons as rivals and the Trinity [he presented in inaccurately].

6. It was Muhammad who started the whole problem without any solid grounds nor basis where his insulted the teachings of the Qureshi, Jews and Christians. From this provocations there is natural continual tit-for-tat that got worse and worse. Naturally, since Muhammad did not stop the pagans and the others tried to do something about it. If Muhammad had not started the whole thing from the wrong interpretation of his altered states experience, none the tit-for-that would have happened.

7. It was only fortunate for Muhammad that he won [due to greater aggression] over the Meccan pagans, Jews and Christian, and that was very unfortunate for humanity up to this day.

Your presentation that the polytheists attack first is a false view and WRONG. What I presented in 1-7 above is the most plausible scenario which can be verified by similar incidents throughout history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-02-2015, 08:04 AM
204 posts, read 109,283 times
Reputation: 15

Clearly as we see in the above Noble Verses, the laws of the Unbelievers or killing the pagans were for Particular and specific times, and not for all times and all places. NOTICE: "... after this year ..." and "... when the sacred months have passed ...".

It is important to knowthat when Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) started preaching Islam, he had to deal with 360 Arab pagan tribes at first, and he and his followers had to go through a lot of battles That Were Imposed upon them by the pagans who were threatened by the new system and Wonderful Religion of Islam.

This was fresh revealed towards the end of the revelation period and Relates to a limited context. Hostilities were frozen for a four-month period during Which the Arabs Pledged not to wage war. Prophet Muhammad was inspired to use this period encouragement to the combatants to join the Muslim ranks or, if they chose, to leave the area that was under Muslims rule; However, if they were to resume hostilities, then the Muslims would fight back until victorious . One is inspired to note That even in this context of war, the fresh Concludes by emphasizing the divine attributes of mercy and forgiveness. To minimize hostilities, the Qur'an ordered Muslims to grant asylum to anyone, even an enemy, who Sought refuge. Asylum Granted accordion thing would be to the customs of chivalry, the person would be told the message of the Qur'an but not coerced into accepting That message. After there, he or she would be escorted to safety regard less of his or her religion.

Therefore, this fresh once again Refers To Those pagans who would continued to fight after the period of peace. It clearly commands the Muslims to Protect Those who seek peace and are non-combatants. It is a specific fresh with a specific ruling and can in no way be applied to general situations. The command of the fresh was only to be applied in the event of a battle.

This fresh is quoted during a battle. We knowthat America was once at war with Vietnam. Suppose the President of America or the General of the American Army told the American soldiers during the war: "Wherever you find the Vietnamese, kill them". Today if I Say That the American President said, "Wherever you find Vietnamese, kill them" without giving the context, I will make him sound like a butcher. But if I was quote him in context, that he said it during a war, it will sound very logical, as he trying to boost the morale of the American soldiers during the war. Similarly in Surat At-Tawbah, Chapter 9, 5 fresh, the Qur'an says, "Kill the polytheists / idolaters wherever you find them", during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur'an is telling Muslim soldiers is, do not be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them. Surat At-Tawbah, Chapter 9, fresh 6 gives the answer to the allegation That Islam Promotes violence, brutality and bloodshed.

It is a call to Explicitly SELF-DEFENSE, not aggression. Therefore, the context of the fresh within the Surah makes it clear thatthis Refers to Those Who are persistent in Their hostilities and attacks against Muslims, and it is applied only in battle.

The Qur'an not only saysthat a Mushrik seeking asylum during the battle Should Be Granted refuge, but usefull That he should be escorted to a secure place. In the present international scenario, even a kind, peace-loving army General, during a battle, May let the enemy soldiers go free, if they for peace. But Which army General will ever tell his soldiers, that if the enemy soldiers for peace during a battle, do not just let them go free, but usefull escort them to a place of security? This is exactly what Allah (Glorified and Exalted is He) says in the Glorious Qur'an to Promote peace in the world.

[LEFT]U.S. officer in Iraq throws his stars for Islam [/LEFT]


so here you are wrong


The Khosrau of Persia had gone so far as to order his commander in Yemen Specifically to kill the Prophet (peace be upon him). The Romans Mobilized Their forces to fight the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the Muslims Confronted them in the Battles of Mu'tah and Tabouk during the Prophet's lifetime.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not initiate agression against anyone, rather he and his followers were under attack from all who Sought to crush the new Islamic state. The first hostilities between the Muslims and the Roman empire Began when the Prophet Muhammad's messenger to the Ghassan tribe (a governate of the Roman empire), Al-Harith bin Umayr al-Azdi, was tied up and beheaded. According to Ar-Rahiq al-Makhtum, a modern Islamic hagiography of Muhammad written by the Indian Muslim author Saif ur-Rahman Mubarakpuri, the reason for war against the Byzantine Empire, Was that one of Muhammad's ambassadors was killed by Sharhabeel bin 'Amr Al -Ghassani (the governor of Al-Balqa). Immediately This led to the Battle of Mutah. But Mubarakpuri usefull Claims That event was one of the reasons of the Battle of Tabouk also. Mubarakpuri further Top mentions That the emperor of the Byzantine Empire, Heraclius was preparing a force to demolish the growing Muslim power in the region.

The killing of a diplomat was an open act of war, and the Prophet Muhammad sent an armed force to confront the tribe, but the Roman empire Brought in reinforcements and the Resulting conflict, known as the Battle of Mut'ah, was a defeat for the Muslims. Only after this did Subsequent battles between the Muslims and the Roman Empire Occur, and the Muslims emerged victorious. Likewise, hostilities between the Muslims and the Persians only Began after the Persian emperor Khosrau ordered his governor in Yemen, Badhan (or Badham, Bazan), to kill the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Although his efforts were thwarted when the Latter accepted Islam. Other non-Muslim groups, zoals Those in Madinah, usefull initiated hostilities against the Muslims despite peace treaties.

Axis for fighting the Jews (People of the Scripture), they had Conducted a peace pact with the Messenger after he MIGRATED to Madinah. Soon afterwards, they betrayed the peace pact and joined forces with the pagans and the hypocrites against Muslims. They usefull fought against Muslims during the Battle of the Trench (Ahzab), then Allah revealed.

In light of the historical context of this fresh, it becomes very clear That the fresh was revealed in connection with agression initiated against Muslims.

All of These verses, without exception, if Studied carefully, address aggression and oppression committed against Muslims at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), Whether by idolatrous Arabs, some of the Jewish tribes in Madinah, or by some Christians.

Therefore, the command to fight in verse 9:29 Relates To Those non-muslims who commit agression and not Those Who are committed to live in peace. The fresh is subject to certain conditions That Were Implemented apparent when it was in the time of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH):

What we have stated makes it clear That Islam did not allow the initia tion of hostilities, except to: 1. repel aggression; 2. protect Islamic propagation 3. Ensure deter Fitnah and oppression and freedom of religion. In Such cases, fighting becomes a necessity of the religion and one of its sacred ordainments. It is then called, 'Jihad'.

▶ د.ذاكر يجيب!!ما خطيئة آدم؟ حقيقة المرأة عند النصارى؟ - YouTube


اثبت أني مخطئة وسوف اعتنق الاسلام - د ذاكر نايك YouTube

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-07-2015, 07:02 AM
204 posts, read 109,283 times
Reputation: 15
اسلام كاميروني بعد سؤاله هل يوجد سلام في العالم - د ذاكرYouTube


جديد اسئلة عن البعث والانتحار والاطفال المعاقين واجابات رائعة للدكتور ذاكر نايك YouTube

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-07-2015, 09:33 PM
Location: Not-a-Theist
3,440 posts, read 1,589,410 times
Reputation: 461
The title of this thread and the posts herein reek of proselytizing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-07-2015, 10:02 PM
Location: Logan Township, Minnesota
15,511 posts, read 13,305,624 times
Reputation: 7407
Originally Posted by Continuum View Post
The title of this thread and the posts herein reek of proselytizing.
this is the Islamic forum. It is intended to be pro-Islam Just as the Judaism Forum is pro-Judaism, the Christian Forum is pro Christian, the Atheist Forum is pro-Atheism.

the goal of each of the Religious forums was to have a place were adherents of the specific beliefs could present their view with no interference from other faiths. It was also to keep us from proselytizing in the other forums.

Just as non-Judaic views are not allowed in the Jewish Forum and non-Christian views are not allowed in the Christian Forum.
When posting as a MOD my posts will be in red

No advertising, no copyrighted material, no personal attacks

MODERATOR OF: Buddhism: Judaism: Paganism:

When in doubt read the TOS MOD LIST FAQ's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-11-2015, 07:51 AM
204 posts, read 109,283 times
Reputation: 15
1 – The Qur’aan enjoins good treatment of one's wife: she is to be honoured and treated kindly, even when one no longer feels love in one's heart towards her. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“and live with them honourably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allaah brings through it a great deal of good”

[al-Nisa’ 4:19]

2 – The Qur’aan explains that women have rights over their husbands, just as their husbands have rights over them. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them. And Allaah is All-Mighty, All-Wise”

[al-Baqarah 2:228]

This verse indicates that the man has additional rights, commensurate with his role as protector and maintainer and his responsibility of spending (on his wife) etc.

3 – The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of people as those who are best to their wives. He said: “The best of you are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my wives.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Maajah, 1977; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.

4 – The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) spoke beautiful word concerning kind treatment of one’s wife, stating that when the husband feeds his wife and puts a morsel of food in her mouth, he earns the reward of doing an act of charity. He said, “You never spend anything but you will be rewarded for it, even the morsel of food that you lift to your wife’s mouth.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 6352; Muslim, 1628.

Christian Converts To Islam After Losing Debate [HD]


British Police Officer Converts to ISLAM and crying ! 2015

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Islam
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top