Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Jacksonville
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2008, 04:27 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by riveree View Post
Correct, trailers are already taxed at a lower rate, but this will give trailers another tax break that single family homeowners will not receive in this amendment - in that regard it is not even across the board.

What I'm suggesting is if we are worried about people who live in trailers because they might be in a lower economic class, then why don't we just address that lower economic class, why are we saying 'this break is for trailers only'? Why not just give to everyone whose home is valued at under $200k?

It's curious, that's all.
what is curious to me is that some people are voting no based on the fact that they hope the politicians will come up with something else! they barely got this done! our current politicians are useless in this state and we cannot count on them to come up with something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2008, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Jax
8,200 posts, read 35,456,050 times
Reputation: 3443
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
what is curious to me is that some people are voting no based on the fact that they hope the politicians will come up with something else! they barely got this done! our current politicians are useless in this state and we cannot count on them to come up with something else.
Maybe some are. For myself, it's a number of reasons. I think the first proposal was transparent in its' intent, and I did not agree with it. This second proposal was better, but I think it still has some fatal flaws.

I guess we'll know shortly how it all turns out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 05:41 AM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,912,825 times
Reputation: 4459
it passed but we absolutely need to do more! this cannot be the end of property tax reform for florida. at least the politicians can see that floridians are fed up with their wasteful spending. they will have more money coming in from the indian casinos so there is no excuse to cut any services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 07:12 AM
 
859 posts, read 3,617,680 times
Reputation: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
it passed but we absolutely need to do more! this cannot be the end of property tax reform for florida. at least the politicians can see that floridians are fed up with their wasteful spending. they will have more money coming in from the indian casinos so there is no excuse to cut any services.
They ought to build more Indian casinos then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 07:53 AM
 
Location: western East Roman Empire
9,364 posts, read 14,307,279 times
Reputation: 10082
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
... at least the politicians can see that Floridians are fed up with their wasteful spending. they will have more money coming in from the indian casinos so there is no excuse to cut any services.
Are you sure that they are receiving this message?

The message they receive may also be that they can dupe the majority of Floridians with a sop, on the one hand, and reward the blessed few, on the other.

I believe that the only way to make sure that they get the message on wasteful spending is for ordinary citizens to bombard them with acrimonious complaints and referendum proposals for laws that cap local government spending, analogous to laws which cap increases in assessed property values, threatening them with the vote if they do not act concretely with binding legislation within two years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 10:44 AM
 
859 posts, read 3,617,680 times
Reputation: 288
Now that it's passed...how long of a wait for it to materialize into something more tangible?
Interesting in the paper it said Duval voted opposite of what rest of Floridian voted for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Black Hammock Island
4,620 posts, read 14,985,603 times
Reputation: 4620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bale002 View Post
I believe that the only way to make sure that they get the message on wasteful spending is for ordinary citizens to bombard them with acrimonious complaints and referendum proposals for laws that cap local government spending, analogous to laws which cap increases in assessed property values, threatening them with the vote if they do not act concretely with binding legislation within two years.
Massachusetts with Proposition 2 1/2
Proposition 2½ - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and California with Proposition 13
California Proposition 13 (1978) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I can't speak for the effects on California, but MA voters did it more than 25 years ago and the commonwealth didn't cave in and implode.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 11:10 AM
 
126 posts, read 341,388 times
Reputation: 32
I don't see fl having many people from out of state moving in .If they have to pay higher taxes.How will that work
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Middleburg, FL
754 posts, read 2,815,226 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANDYHAIR View Post
I don't see fl having many people from out of state moving in .If they have to pay higher taxes.How will that work
The only way that would work, Sandy, is if they are moving to FL from a state that has a higher tax burden (NJ, NY, etc.).

If they're considering moving here from, say Indiana (or any other low cost-of-living state), then you are correct in that this would give them pause.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Jax
8,200 posts, read 35,456,050 times
Reputation: 3443
Quote:
Originally Posted by travelingfood View Post
Now that it's passed...how long of a wait for it to materialize into something more tangible?
Interesting in the paper it said Duval voted opposite of what rest of Floridian voted for.
Well, it's retroactive to January 1, 2008, so technically it's already "in effect", but I don't know how they'll handle this year's property tax since now they overcharged many of us?

Yeah, it's kind of sad that Duval (and I think there was one other county) was all alone in voting against this.

Ah well, it is what it, we'll see how it goes I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Jacksonville
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top