Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Judaism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2014, 08:24 AM
 
864 posts, read 869,891 times
Reputation: 258

Advertisements

You seem to have forgotten some very important information:

The Torah states (Lev. 25:17 & Lev. 19:16) "One should not wrong his fellow" and "Do not act as a talebearer among your people," but heretics do not fit under this category for they do not act as "your people." Therefore, we follow the practice (as taught in Avot D'Rabbi Natan, a work from the Talmudic era), "those who hate you, L-rd, I will hate, and your rebellious ones I will dispute."
An "apikorus" (heretic) is one who denies the laws and prophecies of Israel, whether the Written Law or Oral Law. Even if he says, "All the Torah is true with the exception of one Scriptural verse, kal v'chomer, g'zeira shava, or one grammatical detail," he is included in this category. ["Kal v'chomer" and "g'zeira shava" are Talmudic terms for two of the logical principles from which we understand many laws.]
*Important note: there is a large in-between category not mentioned in this paragraph, namely those who do not observe - or even commit some sins - but without the malicious intent of heresy. Lashon Hara against someone in this middle category is forbidden. The purpose of these laws permitting speech against an actual heretic is not for a community to degenerate into nasty name-calling, but rather to protect itself against the influence of those who flagrantly do not care about the image they set for the community and even intentionally wish to destroy it


Chapter 8: About Different People - Torah.org


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:46 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,715,897 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post

The Torah states (Lev. 25:17 & Lev. 19:16) "One should not wrong his fellow" and "Do not act as a talebearer among your people," but heretics do not fit under this category for they do not act as "your people." Therefore, we follow the practice (as taught in Avot D'Rabbi Natan, a work from the Talmudic era), "those who hate you, L-rd, I will hate, and your rebellious ones I will dispute."
An "apikorus" (heretic) is one who denies the laws and prophecies of Israel, whether the Written Law or Oral Law. Even if he says, "All the Torah is true with the exception of one Scriptural verse, kal v'chomer, g'zeira shava, or one grammatical detail," he is included in this category. ["Kal v'chomer" and "g'zeira shava" are Talmudic terms for two of the logical principles from which we understand many laws.]
*Important note: there is a large in-between category not mentioned in this paragraph, namely those who do not observe - or even commit some sins - but without the malicious intent of heresy. Lashon Hara against someone in this middle category is forbidden. The purpose of these laws permitting speech against an actual heretic is not for a community to degenerate into nasty name-calling, but rather to protect itself against the influence of those who flagrantly do not care about the image they set for the community and even intentionally wish to destroy it


Chapter 8: About Different People - Torah.org


You seem to like Plagiarism since none of this is in your own words and thus a violation of the TOS

Copyright Information - Torah.org
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:48 PM
 
864 posts, read 869,891 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
You seem to like Plagiarism since none of this is in your own words and thus a violation of the TOS
Do you read your own links, Pruzh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:53 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,715,897 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
Do you read your own links, Pruzh?
The link is not the issue. The entire paragraph you posted is. Fyi you can post a few sentences as a lead to a link, but not an entire paragraph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Lake Worth, FL
388 posts, read 384,280 times
Reputation: 265
I didn't know that we had to use APA specs when writing posts on an informal website forum, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island
1,790 posts, read 1,862,401 times
Reputation: 1555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tikva View Post
I didn't know that we had to use APA specs when writing posts on an informal website forum, lol.
I has more to with copyright infringement; posting full sections of someone's work or not giving sources can be (and often is) pursued as lawsuits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 01:05 PM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,715,897 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tikva View Post
I didn't know that we had to use APA specs when writing posts on an informal website forum, lol.
fyi per TOS

Copyrighted Material - Instead of copying-and-pasting articles, photos, or other material you find on the Internet, you should be posting links to those articles. Posting a snippet from the article and then the link is the appropriate way to post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 01:20 PM
 
864 posts, read 869,891 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
Copyrighted Material - Instead of copying-and-pasting articles, photos, or other material you find on the Internet, you should be posting links to those articles. Posting a snippet from the article and then the link is the appropriate way to post.
Pruzh, are you okay? Seriously. Go back to the OP and you will see a paragraph and a link. So what is your problem, other than trying to create a war to divert attention from text of the posting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 02:37 PM
 
Location: OC/LA
3,830 posts, read 4,658,707 times
Reputation: 2214
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
An "apikorus" (heretic) is one who denies the laws and prophecies of Israel, whether the Written Law or Oral Law. Even if he says, "All the Torah is true with the exception of one Scriptural verse, kal v'chomer, g'zeira shava, or one grammatical detail," he is included in this category. ["Kal v'chomer" and "g'zeira shava" are Talmudic terms for two of the logical principles from which we understand many laws.]
*Important note: there is a large in-between category not mentioned in this paragraph, namely those who do not observe - or even commit some sins - but without the malicious intent of heresy. Lashon Hara against someone in this middle category is forbidden. The purpose of these laws permitting speech against an actual heretic is not for a community to degenerate into nasty name-calling, but rather to protect itself against the influence of those who flagrantly do not care about the image they set for the community and even intentionally wish to destroy it


Chapter 8: About Different People - Torah.org


Iwish, so by this definition someone who does not consider the Torah scientifically or historically 100% accurate would be a heretic and not in the middle category. Correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 02:56 PM
 
864 posts, read 869,891 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
Iwish, so by this definition someone who does not consider the Torah scientifically or historically 100% accurate would be a heretic and not in the middle category. Correct?
Your question is off base. Let me rephrase your sentence, someone who denies the divinity of the Torah, down to its minutiae, is a heretic. The Torah is neither a history book nor a science book. I actually get annoyed with Jews who come up with "scientific proofs" that the events in the Torah actually happened.

Last edited by iwishiwerethin; 02-24-2014 at 03:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Judaism

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top