Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > Kansas City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-19-2012, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Kansas City North
6,816 posts, read 11,542,919 times
Reputation: 17146

Advertisements

Terminal A is the likely destination of the new KCI - KansasCity.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2012, 08:59 PM
 
Location: KC Area
345 posts, read 833,386 times
Reputation: 224
Good news, KC really needs this. My only complaint is that it is still 15-20 minutes away from the city. BUT a new airport could be so beneficial to the area, both in the Northland specifically AND the entire metro. The article said it could open as soon as 2016? That's awesome news to hear, I hope this goes well and really spurs other "next step" development in KC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2012, 09:27 PM
 
639 posts, read 766,673 times
Reputation: 453
KC should have done this 30 years ago-is it too late though in the game to make a new terminal now? I mean, by the time they get this built-Southwest will be entranced in Denver and St Louis for the midwest area-they won't need Kansas City at that time, oil will be who know's how much, air travel may be in decline by then. Plus, why build a new terminal with less than 50 gates? It's seems too little too late. I still think there should be some way they could make terminal B with 30 gates all available for Southwest to use. When Braniff II shut down-they were running around 90 flights a day. Another thing I hate about KCI is that long drive into it off I 29. If they could move a terminal to Hwy 152 it would be closer by about 5 miles to the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2012, 11:40 AM
 
Location: St. Louis, MO
414 posts, read 884,547 times
Reputation: 219
Will it attract more flights? That is all I care about. Capacity doesn't seem to be an issue at KCI, the problem is the availability of flights being abysmal. Make it an airliner friendly airport and shuffle us cattle around with our cheap tickets in hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2012, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,886,188 times
Reputation: 6438
KCI is getting expensive. It's odd that even though Southwest dominates it, that prices are getting so high to fly into KC. It's like turning into an Omaha or OKC with very few non-stops to cities other than hubs (DFW, DIA etc).

I think it has everything to do with the terminal situation.

I flew into KC this weekend BTW. No problems and KCI is not far from the city at all. The suburbs start pretty much just southeast of the field and they are nice suburbs which is often not the case around big airports. The growth in the Northland is pretty incredible. Downtown is very close to KCI with great uncongested highways. The location is fine. (again, if you fly a lot, don't live in lee's summit or overland park and complain about where the airport is). I don't complain where Dulles is. Talk about far, geez.

I spent a few days in KC and every time I go there, I come away less impressed with the metro area as a whole. Went to the speedway area and maybe I have just been out here too long, but that area is just culture shock to me. Never seen so many trailer park looking people in my life. People running from one chain place to the next in a remote development in the middle of nowhere in nascar and kansas college gear. I don't know if a place could be more opposite of where I would want to spend time. But lots of people like it I guess.

Downtown, Crown Center, Westport, Plaza were all hoping and busy. Downtown is amazing now especially when you look at how far its come and the haunted houses in the west bottoms is just so crazy and cool. I don't think there is anything like that on that scale any place else. Very neat thing for KC to have. The sprawl, blight and crazy travel times of driving through miles and miles of sprawl and often crap to get around the metro is a pretty big turn off though. I thought IKEA was going to a decent location, but after spending time driving around the metro. I can't believe they could not have found an empty lot or redevelopment to put that on before tearing down a brand new shopping center. With all the under utilized, empty or run down land in metro kc, they have to build it on top of a new mall (that would likely eventually get tenants.)

Way off topic sorry...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > Kansas City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top