Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo
Weren’t you in the Desoto district though? If so, I understand what you are saying. That would be like going from the RayPec or Grain Valley district to Lee’s Summit. Very good districts, but still more rural, smaller districts with pretty limited opportunities and even some issues with growing pains as they slowly morph into a larger suburban district.
|
Yes, we were in DeSoto District. At the time we moved there, 11 years ago, DeSoto was the highest ranking district in the state. Mainly due to it's small size and low teacher/student ratios. That's primarily why we chose that area.
But we lived in West Shawnee, we were not "rural". We knew that by the time our kids got to HS, that a new HS would be built that was closer than DeSoto High which does tend to be more rural.
Almost all of the growth in the district since then as been in Shawnee. And it has been very rapid. (6 new elementary schools as well as a new middle and new HS all within a decade and all within a couple mile radius.) Desoto has become a district that really IMO needs to be split.
The schools in our area were not at all "rural" schools. They are suburban schools and all quite good. I was not at all dissatisfied with the elementary schools. That's why I expected very little difference with the switch at that level.
The HS concerned me with the rapid growth. It's a very good school. Good teachers, good staff. My kids would have been fine there. But you are correct in that there was just no contest between a school that was struggling with ever-growing class sizes, with few resources or energy left for special programs and one in a more established area. It was a no-brainer to take the opportunity to change high schools.
Quote:
|
I would think some high schools in the SMSD would compete with BV?
|
Yes, most definitely. My #1 choice of HS was SM East. But we just couldn't find the right house in PV area. And I tried! I love that area! So we went wth BV North, my second choice. Again, at the time, I wasn't thinking there would be much difference until they got to HS. I also know that SM has some excellent elementary and middle schools that I'm sure could arguably be as good as BV.
And I know that there are also some great schools with great programs in other parts of the metro. But when asked, I think I can honestly say, BV and/or SM are "better" in many regards.
Not that it's "best" for
everyone but I do have some first-hand comparisons to offer.
Quote:
|
Other downsides to large suburban schools are that it might be much more difficult to make the sports teams or drama and theater clubs first tier. Unless the students are very good, it’s easy to be a backup in schools like that.
|
I agree with this. However, in my humble opinion, being in the ensemble of a theater production with top notch directors and professional choreographers is going to be a better experience than being a lead in a production that's run by Mr. Jones from typing class who has been to a few plays.
Same deal in sports. It might be harder to get noticed, but the
learning experience is likely to be better.
Quote:
|
I’m glad to see your kids are excelling though and doing even better and able to take advantage of what BV offers and you moved just so they could. That says a lot about your priorities and I’m sure it will pay off.
|
Thanks. I hope so.
I guess the point of all this is that when people ask, and when I talk about why I think BV or SM are among the best public schools in the region, I'm not just tooting JoCo's horn.
