|

10-21-2009, 04:51 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
8 posts, read 3,670 times
Reputation: 10
|
|
What do you consider a "big city"?
Name a few outside of the huge citys like New York, St Louis, Louisville
|
|

10-21-2009, 08:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
148 posts, read 54,198 times
Reputation: 47
|
|
|
Annapolis/DC/Baltimore........3 different cities, one in the same.
|
|

10-22-2009, 04:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
221 posts, read 172,013 times
Reputation: 86
|
|
|
I don't consider St louis or Louisville as being huge cities. I generally have a cutoff of around 4-5 million in the metro area before I consider it to be a "huge" city. In that case, NYC, Chicago, Detroit, LA, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas/FW, Houston, DC/Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia. Even within that grouping New York, Chicago and LA are in another league compared to the rest.
St. Louis would fall in what I consider large cities (2-4 million people). That includes places like Cleveland, Cincy, Tampa, Pittsburgh, Orlando, Kansas City, Minneapolis, San Antonio, San Diego, Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle.
Louisville falls in the "good sized city" category (1-2 million). Places like Nashville, Birmingham, Charlotte, Indy, Memphis, Columbus, Austin, Oklahoma City, and Albuquerqe. I know that's a horrible classification name, but I can't think of any better now.
Lexington would fall in the city category (500,000-1 million) along with places like Akron, Little Rock, Toledo, dayton, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Madison, and Tulsa, among many others.
|
|

10-25-2009, 08:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The State Of California
1,283 posts, read 694,314 times
Reputation: 381
|
|
Two Classification Big Cities And Big Metro's
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin8868
Name a few outside of the huge citys like New York, St Louis, Louisville
|
I consider big Cities anything above 300,000
Medium Cities 200,000 - 300,000
Small Cities 100,000 - 200,000
I consider Big Metro's as anything over 4,000,000
Medium Metro's 2,000,000 - 4,000,000
Small Metro's 500,000 - 2,000,000
A Large Metro Would Be
NYC
LA
Chicago
S.F. Bay
Boston
Houston
Dallas/Fort Worth
Washington/Baltimore
Miami/Fort Lauderdale
Atlanta
Philladepphia
Detroit
Phoenix
Borderline Medium To Large Markets
Minneapolis/St.Paul
Seattle
Denver
San Diego
|
|

10-27-2009, 05:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
1,431 posts, read 616,055 times
Reputation: 578
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hey_Hey
I don't consider St louis or Louisville as being huge cities. I generally have a cutoff of around 4-5 million in the metro area before I consider it to be a "huge" city. In that case, NYC, Chicago, Detroit, LA, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas/FW, Houston, DC/Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia. Even within that grouping New York, Chicago and LA are in another league compared to the rest.
St. Louis would fall in what I consider large cities (2-4 million people). That includes places like Cleveland, Cincy, Tampa, Pittsburgh, Orlando, Kansas City, Minneapolis, San Antonio, San Diego, Denver, Phoenix, and Seattle.
Louisville falls in the "good sized city" category (1-2 million). Places like Nashville, Birmingham, Charlotte, Indy, Memphis, Columbus, Austin, Oklahoma City, and Albuquerqe. I know that's a horrible classification name, but I can't think of any better now.
Lexington would fall in the city category (500,000-1 million) along with places like Akron, Little Rock, Toledo, dayton, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Madison, and Tulsa, among many others.
|
There is a slight flaw in this classification system of metros, but for the most part I agree. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|