Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Tennessee > Kingsport - Johnson City - Bristol
 [Register]
Kingsport - Johnson City - Bristol The Tri-Cities area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-15-2014, 03:25 PM
 
431 posts, read 1,219,140 times
Reputation: 424

Advertisements

This is possibly the wrong forum but I go there with my kids a lot and it is fairly close to Kingsport.

I have a friend who grew up near Natural Tunnel park in VA....and she played in the creek that runs through Natural Tunmel (stock creek) all the time.

She recently told me that she found out there had been a Lithium mine called Foot (Foote?) Mineral that had contaminated the creek and the mine got shut down.

She also drank from the spring as did many others and says it was later found to be contaminated. She says her relatives tell stories about way before she was born how the creek would get milky water and burn if you got it on your skin.

She says the mine was shut down and declared a 100 year dead zone and says many in that area tha drank the water and played in the creek now have cancer. Lots of her family has it.

Anybody heard of this? I know my kids played in the creek last yr at Natural Tunnel and she was like....I wouldnt touch it if I was you ! Then she told me what she had been told.
(I played in it when I would visit my friend before we knew !).

I cannot find any info on this mine or on the contamination. She says the name of the mine may have changed over the years but she rememners Foot ...and lithium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2014, 04:03 PM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,066 posts, read 21,123,322 times
Reputation: 43615
I found a PDF file from 2006. Sorry, I don't know how to get a link to it, but this is directly from the PDF. Lots of technical stuff over my head, but basically seems to be saying that chemical pollution is not significant, however there are other problems with the creek, mostly in the form of excessive sediment.


"The Stock Creek Watershed is located in Scott County, Virginia. Stock Creek is a
tributary to the Clinch River in the Tennessee/Big Sandy River Basin. The benthic impairment
on Stock Creek extends 0.69 miles from the impoundment near the former Cyprus Foot Mineral
Company to river mile 4.53.....
Historic mining operations conducted formerly by the Cyprus Foote Mineral Corporation
and later on the same site by the Chemetall Foote Corporation Sunbright Facility caused
degradation to the benthic community of Stock Creek; both operations have since ceased. The
operations produced lithium hydroxide and extracted limestone on site. The process produced a
large amount of calcium aluminum silicate that was stockpiled on site. Studies conducted in the
1970s and 1980s confirmed that the benthic community below this site was depressed and
suspected lithium released from the facility was impacting the stream. Lithium was detected in
concentrations below acute thresholds but above the chronic thresholds from 1982 through 1984
in these studies. The last time lithium was found above the chronic concentration was in 1996.
Significant remediation work has occurred at the former Cyprus Foote Site since that time,
120,000 cubic yards of calcium aluminum silicate has been removed, the stormwater
sedimentation pond was demolished and its wastes removed and a tailings pile was removed.
These actions were conducted to halt the release of lithium and other on site materials to the
environment. As expected, an improvement in the benthic community of Stock Creek has been
observed.....

Stock Creek first was assessed as moderately impaired at station 6BSTO005.26 in the Fall of 1992. The
assessments at this monitoring station have bounced between non-impaired, slightly impaired
and moderately impaired based on the reference site from 1992 through 1998. Another
monitoring station, 6BSTO004.73, located on Stock Creek just downstream of monitoring
station 6BST005.26 was evaluated as moderately impaired from the fall of 1995 through the fall
of 1997. The last four RBP II assessments at this site, Spring and Fall 1998, Fall 2003 and
Spring 2004, were all found to be non-impaired.
Using the SCI method to evaluate the same assessment data, 6BSTO004.73 was found to
be non-impaired in the spring of 2004 and 2005....

As stated above, the biological assessments on Stock Creek were not able to discern a
clear stressor to the Creek, though historic data pointed to lithium which is no longer observed at
chronic concentrations in the water
. The TMDL modelers therefore conducted a stressor
identification analysis to determine what was impacting the benthic community. Ambient water
quality data was able to rule out dissolved oxygen, temperature or pH as possible stressors to
Stock Creek. An excessive loading of sediment was seen as the cause of the benthic impairment
on Stock Creek."

Hope this helps

adding a link that may (or may not) reassure you- http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/va.htm

Last edited by DubbleT; 01-15-2014 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2014, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Sullivan County, Tennessee
510 posts, read 1,386,833 times
Reputation: 573
I had to go hunting for this report I found some time ago (I was curious about this underground mine and surface operation since this is a limestone cave rich karst area).

The report will make some good reading for a long winter evening.

http://www.deq.virginia.gov/fileshar...ct%20Sheet.pdf

As DubbleT said, I don't think you need fear the water in Stock Creek (now anyway).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2014, 07:58 PM
 
431 posts, read 1,219,140 times
Reputation: 424
Great info! Looks like she was right on the money as this would have been the same time frame she spoke of. Good to know it isnt as bad now!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2014, 06:40 AM
 
503 posts, read 926,346 times
Reputation: 416
I wouldn't worry about this at all. I read the info above and it sounds like the only issues were excessive sedimentation and high pH that had an adverse effect on aquatic life. The burning skin sensation was possibly due to the excessively high pH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Tennessee > Kingsport - Johnson City - Bristol
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top