Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:17 PM
 
11 posts, read 41,620 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

I'm from Los Angeles and have decided to purchase an investment property after being shocked at the price of homes in Vegas. I've called a couple agents and have already been pre-approved, but I'm just trying to get as much insight as possible.

Some of these houses at 50k just seem too good to be true. They are 10x better than what I could buy in my town, and 10x cheaper.

I've looked on Craigslist and they seem to all be renting for 1000-1300, too. I called a property management co. and he said that it takes about 2 months, on average, to rent a house out and smaller homes go for ~1100 while larger homes can get ~1300+.

My biggest concern is that I buy a house, fix it up to rent, and it sits on the market for a year (or even several months) vacant. I have 50k to put down so I could buy one with cash, OR put 25k down on two properties which is what I'm leaning towards.

I feel like I'm missing something here because why haven't all the investors bought them all up already? Should I be warned of anything? What have your experiences been like??

I'm trying to drive out there this weekend to look at places so I need info fast. Thanks in advance for your help!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:33 PM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,631 posts, read 3,950,349 times
Reputation: 768
This is important news regarding homes priced in the $100,000 are dwindling. Both investors and primary home buyers aren't buying as much since good inventory in this price range seems to be going away.
I have personally seen this happening, homes in that price range now seem to be major fixer uppers.

Fewer existing LV homes sell in May, June than in 2009 July 30, 2010 By Buck Wargo Sales of existing homes in Las Vegas ended a two-year run of year-to-year increases in May.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:41 PM
 
367 posts, read 1,073,710 times
Reputation: 263
My guess is that with the 50k houses, one or more of the following can happen:

The houses will not actually sell for 50k, but higher.
The houses are old and/or in horrible shape
The houses are in "bad" neighborhoods
The houses are short sales and will take time and effort to close a deal on

I doubt you'd get much interest in renting a 900sq ft home in a shady area for $1100+/month. If it sounds too good to be true...
But I am sure a realtor here can give you better and more accurate answers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:47 PM
 
126 posts, read 269,153 times
Reputation: 67
Another point to consider... if someone has $800-1500 to pay for rent, why wouldnt they just purchase a house when they can get a mortgage for maybe $400-800 on a 70-160k house. I wouldnt imagine there are too many renters in the $800-1000 range (except for the ones that just walked away from their 2-3k/mo house payment.. and do you really want to rent to them?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 12:51 PM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,631 posts, read 3,950,349 times
Reputation: 768
actually there are allot of renters in looking for rentals from $800.00 to $1000.00 a month especally with so many foreclosures those people can't buy homes now. Also keep in mind Vegas is at 14.5% unemployment so who are going to be your renters?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:21 PM
 
11 posts, read 41,620 times
Reputation: 12
I'm trying to sort out all the good/bad areas... hard to do from way out here. But there are plenty that are newer construction and look decent inside from the pics (I don't mind a cosmetic fixer-upper), are NOT short sales, and seem to be in a "good" neighborhood (meaning surrounded by newer houses)... like these ones

http://www.lasvegashomes.com/Default...r=/1022327.htm

http://www.lasvegashomes.com/Default...r=/1060077.htm

Those houses here in that sort of neighborhood would fetch 800k easy.

Even if I could only get 1k/month from these that would still be a large profit. Am I missing something or is this just a no-brainer??

Last edited by VR4Jen; 08-05-2010 at 02:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
3,728 posts, read 9,470,355 times
Reputation: 1323
Quite honestly OP, but in my opinion why do you even want to consider buying a property in Las Vegas, strictly for renting it out, with our bad economy here? What do you think the quality of renter is going to be paying such low rent for a very small home?

And being you live in Cali, you'd have to hire a Property Management company here in Las Vegas to manage your house.

Really, the legend of the Las Vegas gold mine money making home ownership is over for folks such as you, using a smallish home as a source of rental income.

You'd be better off putting your nickel and dimes into buying a rental property in places that have better and growing economies, such as Texas, Colorado and North Carolina. At least your investment will gain in value, and not go further down like it's doing here in Las Vegas.

Don't say we didn't tell you so

Much good luck to you in whatever you decide to do! Have fun while here!

Last edited by MomMom; 08-05-2010 at 01:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 02:06 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 4,071,283 times
Reputation: 2589
I don't expect you will find a property for 50k (or even close) that you can rent for $1000-$1300. A friend of mine has a nice property right outside Summerlin, 1700sf built in 2000 that he had to drop the rent to $1200 to get it rented. My guess is that house would sell for at least 125k today, probably more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VR4Jen View Post
I'm from Los Angeles and have decided to purchase an investment property after being shocked at the price of homes in Vegas. I've called a couple agents and have already been pre-approved, but I'm just trying to get as much insight as possible.

Some of these houses at 50k just seem too good to be true. They are 10x better than what I could buy in my town, and 10x cheaper.

I've looked on Craigslist and they seem to all be renting for 1000-1300, too. I called a property management co. and he said that it takes about 2 months, on average, to rent a house out and smaller homes go for ~1100 while larger homes can get ~1300+.

My biggest concern is that I buy a house, fix it up to rent, and it sits on the market for a year (or even several months) vacant. I have 50k to put down so I could buy one with cash, OR put 25k down on two properties which is what I'm leaning towards.

I feel like I'm missing something here because why haven't all the investors bought them all up already? Should I be warned of anything? What have your experiences been like??

I'm trying to drive out there this weekend to look at places so I need info fast. Thanks in advance for your help!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 02:13 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 4,071,283 times
Reputation: 2589
I pulled up the Clancy property. It's not clear since the MLS listing says it is both a Short Sale and and Foreclosure. According to the assessors site, it's not bank owned, so I'm thinking that is a short sale. I wasn't able to pull up the 2nd property.

As you probably already know, the short sale listing price doesn't necessary equate into any type of sales price. It will sell at comps.

That part of town isn't the worst, but definitely not somewhere people desire to live in Las Vegas. You'd probably end up renting to someone who works at the base and I personally don't think you'd get $1000 a month. Maybe more like $800 would be my guess.


Quote:
Originally Posted by VR4Jen View Post
I'm trying to sort out all the good/bad areas... hard to do from way out here. But there are plenty that are newer construction and look decent inside from the pics (I don't mind a cosmetic fixer-upper), are NOT short sales, and seem to be in a "good" neighborhood (meaning surrounded by newer houses)... like these ones

2167 CLANCY ST, Las Vegas, NV 89156 - Las Vegas Real Estate

2718 ADVANCEMENT AV, Las Vegas, NV 89031 - Las Vegas Real Estate

Those houses here in that sort of neighborhood would fetch 800k easy.

Even if I could only get 1k/month from these that would still be a large profit. Am I missing something or is this just a no-brainer??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 02:13 PM
 
11 posts, read 41,620 times
Reputation: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by MomMom View Post
Quite honestly OP, but in my opinion why do you even want to consider buying a property in Las Vegas, strictly for renting it out, with our bad economy here? What do you think the quality of renter is going to be paying such low rent for a very small home?

And being you live in Cali, you'd have to hire a Property Management company here in Las Vegas to manage your house.

Really, the legend of the Las Vegas gold mine money making home ownership is over for folks such as you, using a smallish home as a source of rental income.

You'd be better off putting your nickel and dimes into buying a rental property in places that have better and growing economies, such as Texas, Colorado and North Carolina. At least your investment will gain in value, and not go further down like it's doing here in Las Vegas.

Don't say we didn't tell you so

Much good luck to you in whatever you decide to do! Have fun while here!
Thank you for your advice, it's much appreciated.

I was considering buying a condo locally (there's a few for 100-150k here) but they generate about the same $ of rent for a house in Vegas.... so the numbers say it makes a lot more sense to pay only 50k, and have no HOA fees.

Assuming it is rented out, it would be a very good investment. I wouldn't plan on selling it anytime soon (maybe in 30 years when I retire?) so I'm not too concerned with the immediate values.

I would of course be paying a property management co $100 or so per month, and have a 12 month lease. But even on the months where it sits vacant, I would only be paying a small mortgage (if any at all), maybe $100 in taxes and $100 for management. One month of rent could recoup the costs of it sitting vacant for at least 4 or 5 months.

It seems to me like the ONLY way this could fail is if it never, ever gets rented... which doesn't seem likely. I would just drop the price until it became a good deal for someone... and still make a profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top