[daveyjones978]

Originally Posted by MomMom

Jim, these figures for City of Las Vegas only were listed here at City-Data...don't know how accurate/up to date they are...scroll down past the photos..maybe this website has similiar for all Clark County..

Las Vegas, Nevada (NV) Detailed Profile - relocation, real estate, travel, jobs, hospitals, schools, crime, news, sex offenders

According to that information (thanks MomMom), it would appear that there are 4810/sq. mile, which would be even higher than a lot of places. I am wondering though... are they considering just the incorporated city of Las Vegas, or are they adding to that the people who live in Las Vegas, but are considered uninc. Clark County? Like, for instance, our place is in Las Vegas, but it's not in the actual city.... at least that's what I've been told all along.

I'm in agreeance with JFK, that the # still seems a little high. Although thinking about it a lot of the "upper crust" of Nassau County, for example, all live in estates of 1-2 acres (sometimes even more!). Factoring in that, it might actually make sense...

[MomMom]

Figures from city-data for Clark County

Clark County, Nevada detailed profile - houses, real estate, agriculture, wages, work, ancestries, and more

About 216 people per sq mile, as opposed to City of Las Vegas with 4,810 people per square mile

[daveyjones978]

Originally Posted by MomMom

Figures from city-data for Clark County

Clark County, Nevada detailed profile - houses, real estate, agriculture, wages, work, ancestries, and more

About 216 people per sq mile, as opposed to City of Las Vegas with 4,810 people per square mile

Exactly! Just as I said above. If you look on the map on the above link, it shows Paradise, and Spring Valley as seperate towns... even though they are merely just CDPs, and still part of Las Vegas.

*acha!* <--bad attempt at old Jewish man accent Now it's making a little more sense

[MomMom]

Originally Posted by daveyjones978

According to that information (thanks MomMom), it would appear that there are 4810/sq. mile, which would be even higher than a lot of places. I am wondering though... are they considering just the incorporated city of Las Vegas, or are they adding to that the people who live in Las Vegas, but are considered uninc. Clark County? Like, for instance, our place is in Las Vegas, but it's not in the actual city.... at least that's what I've been told all along.

I'm in agreeance with JFK, that the # still seems a little high. Although thinking about it a lot of the "upper crust" of Nassau County, for example, all live in estates of 1-2 acres (sometimes even more!). Factoring in that, it might actually make sense...

It's City of Las Vegas only, I posted the link for the Clark County info above

[daveyjones978]

Originally Posted by MomMom

It's City of Las Vegas only, I posted the link for the Clark County info above

Yup, just saw and commented. We're both two quick for our own good!

[olecapt]

The citymayors site attempts to do it for metro areas. On that basis by the way LA is the densist area of the country. Las Vegas is just a little less dense than NYC..this though is the 18 million NYC. So I presume Jersey, Long Island and CN.

It might be possible to calculate it roughly by zip code but that is a lot of work. Actually the way to do it is to calculate the area of the urban zip codes and then back out the cities. And that may break because Henderson and Las Vegas have areas that are not in the urban zip codes...rats this is a tough one. No simple answer.

[GLPman]

I checked Western Pacific since I went to college in California, having moved from the Northeast, before moving to Las Vegas for only a year. I miss the city quite a bit, but I love where I am now.

[Daddys///M3]

Hey everyone, just wanted to introduce myself. Originally from San Diego and moved to Vegas in '94.

[AA702]

Originally Posted by Daddys///M3

Hey everyone, just wanted to introduce myself. Originally from San Diego and moved to Vegas in '94.

What year is your M3? I had a 91' and I miss it..

[Daddys///M3]

Originally Posted by AAPoolServiceLV

What year is your M3? I had a 91' and I miss it..

I had a 2002. It's gone now, and I miss mine as well. You had a '91, E30? Too early for E36 I believe. E30 chassis designation ran from '89 to '92, IIRC?