Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2014, 06:30 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,548,972 times
Reputation: 1882

Advertisements

The costs of solar panels for the roofs should come down first before we consider it's applications anywhere else. The cheapest energy is still nuclear if people get over the fear of melt downs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2014, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
3,683 posts, read 9,856,709 times
Reputation: 3016
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
The costs of solar panels for the roofs should come down first before we consider it's applications anywhere else. The cheapest energy is still nuclear if people get over the fear of melt downs.
Not even close. Geothermal is cheapest. Natural gas, hydro, and wind are all cheaper than nuclear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2014, 08:19 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,548,972 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocreButArrogant View Post
Not even close. Geothermal is cheapest. Natural gas, hydro, and wind are all cheaper than nuclear.
I disagree but you're free to your opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2014, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,985,364 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
I disagree but you're free to your opinion.

He and I don't agree very often, but he's right in this case. Nuclear isn't the least expensive option because of storage of the waste, and the potential catastrophe cost -- Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima. They were cheap power sources up until the minute that they weren't. And then they became VERY expensive.

I like the opportunity cost of solar and hydro electric, considering our zip code.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2014, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
3,683 posts, read 9,856,709 times
Reputation: 3016
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
I disagree but you're free to your opinion.
My opinion is based on reading some DOE reports on the all-in cost per megawatt-hour of different powerplant fuel sources in the USA, to confirm what I already expected:

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf...generation.pdf

What's yours based on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2014, 09:56 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,548,972 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocreButArrogant View Post
My opinion is based on reading some DOE reports on the all-in cost per megawatt-hour of different powerplant fuel sources in the USA, to confirm what I already expected:

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf...generation.pdf

What's yours based on?
Many different talks based on the pros and cons of all energy sources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2014, 09:58 PM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,548,972 times
Reputation: 1882
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoopLV View Post
He and I don't agree very often, but he's right in this case. Nuclear isn't the least expensive option because of storage of the waste, and the potential catastrophe cost -- Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima. They were cheap power sources up until the minute that they weren't. And then they became VERY expensive.

I like the opportunity cost of solar and hydro electric, considering our zip code.
Well until solar/geo/wind becomes so abundant/cost effective/efficient that they are on par with the energy production of coal power plants you're either for coal or for nuclear energy and everything in between would only power 1 bedroom in every house in america.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2014, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,985,364 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
Well until solar/geo/wind becomes so abundant/cost effective/efficient that they are on par with the energy production of coal power plants you're either for coal or for nuclear energy and everything in between would only power 1 bedroom in every house in america.
If everyone used as little electricity as we do, America could get by with half of its power plants.

And what part of "nuclear is the cheapest power source up until it isn't" is not clear? I'm sure there are millions of Japanese and Ukrainians who agree. If I had my way, everyone who wants nuclear power would spend a full year living in Pripyat.



... at least the neighbors are very, very quiet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2014, 09:02 AM
 
2,928 posts, read 3,548,972 times
Reputation: 1882
Consumption is predicted to increase per person not reduce. Every time something is invented that might reduce consumption, we find another use for that energy.

The answer is to build plants to be more immune to melt down or if they do melt down, they are contained within the plant itself and region wide evacuation is not necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2014, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,985,364 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddrhazy View Post
The answer is to build plants to be more immune to melt down or if they do melt down, they are contained within the plant itself and region wide evacuation is not necessary.
Yeah, but we're not doing that. So the best course of action is to stay far away from nuclear power plants. A storm, earthquake or Homer Simpson can ruin entire regions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top