Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:13 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,559,582 times
Reputation: 2604

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
I never said it was illegal.

The OJs were not always in the 5T area, either.
The chinese were not always in bensonhurst. In fact neither were the italians.

I see no relevancy to your points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:17 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,559,582 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crookhaven View Post
Interesting point in so far as DC is not an actual State but I'm still calling foul for encroachment.

My original question wasnt answered.What is the benefit to the greater community when even fellow Jews are in opposition?
1. I dont see how DC being a state or not is relevant - the first amendment etc all apply to DC as well as any state
2. I dont know what encroachment you are talking about
3. I am not sure why there has to be benefit to the entire community. What benefit is there to the community when I play poker with my friends, or order a pizza? Those are private acts, conducted by a private individual. In our society we look for a public interest, direct or indirect, before restricting private activity.
4. Fellow Jews have a right to object to something that other Jews are for. Their views are not privileged on that account - just as the views of members of any groups are not privileged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:18 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
The chinese were not always in bensonhurst. In fact neither were the italians.

I see no relevancy to your points.
? Should I be running away or something, just because I disagree with it? I am staying and fighting, just like how there are people fighting for the Eruv in WH, for what I think should be going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:19 AM
 
7,658 posts, read 19,170,730 times
Reputation: 1328
Do you think there more Jews on LI/Brooklyn/Queens than Israel these days?

Seriously maybe a Senior Rabbi could do the whole Paumanok Surf line and call it a day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:19 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
3. I am not sure why there has to be benefit to the entire community. What benefit is there to the community when I play poker with my friends, or order a pizza? Those are private acts, conducted by a private individual. In our society we look for a public interest, direct or indirect, before restricting private activity.
Putting a bunch of wires in public areas on public property by municipal employees != private acts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:20 AM
 
7,658 posts, read 19,170,730 times
Reputation: 1328
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
1. I dont see how DC being a state or not is relevant - the first amendment etc all apply to DC as well as any state
2. I dont know what encroachment you are talking about
3. I am not sure why there has to be benefit to the entire community. What benefit is there to the community when I play poker with my friends, or order a pizza? Those are private acts, conducted by a private individual. In our society we look for a public interest, direct or indirect, before restricting private activity.
4. Fellow Jews have a right to object to something that other Jews are for. Their views are not privileged on that account - just as the views of members of any groups are not privileged.
One would argue that a public improvement (other than for the handicapped) should be in the interest of the many?

As for pizza it must be 420.

Crooks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:31 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,559,582 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
Putting a bunch of wires in public areas on public property by municipal employees != private acts.

I do not read where municipal employees will be involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:32 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 20 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,085,392 times
Reputation: 15538
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
I am not sure what you mean by diluted - is there a stricter approach to an eruv that you advocate?

The approach of rabbis over the centuries is to make leniencies in small areas, that make observance easier, rather than to abolish whole areas of the law - with profound effects not only on Jewish practice and jewish life, but on other areas of the law. As a Conservative Jew, a member of a group that ordains women rabbis and recognizes same sex commitment ceremonies, I see no compelling reason to relax shabbos restrictions. If anything I see Jews favoring movements that demand more of them, and reward them with a deeply fulfilling shabbos experience.

If you feel more comfortabnle with a different approach though, you could join a Reform or Reconstructionist shul. If you are a conservative Jew, well you can argue against the likes of me within the framework of our movement.

If you are not a Jew, I dont see how Jewish shabbos law is more of a concern of yours, than say, priestly celebacy or the language of the mass is a concern of mine (I do not consider EITHER issue a concern of mind, BTW)
I do not advocate any eruv. Part of Wikopedia “In modern times, when housing is not typically organized into walled courtyards, rabbinic interpretation has permitted this requirement to be met by creating a continuous wall or fence, real or symbolic, surrounding the area to be aggregated” If they can interpret it from a traditional physical structure than they can go the next step and make it symbolic.

As for Synagogue membership most articles I see show a decrease in enrollment and a lesser observance of the practices among American Jews.

I was raised in a conservative shul but am non-practicing. I really have a hard time dealing with the earth bound administration of religions. I would like to see a Reconstructionist Shul I have read about them and it looks interesting. There not here but a Messianic Congregation is and I’ll pass.

I grew up dealing with the momzer’s of New Square and Monsey. These people may live as they choose but when they start trying to change communities to suit their needs they have pushed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:33 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,559,582 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crookhaven View Post
One would argue that a public improvement (other than for the handicapped) should be in the interest of the many?

As for pizza it must be 420.

Crooks

A public improvement funded by the public. Something done by a private entity, no.

In the case of a regulated public utility, if it involves a cost that will impact their rates, then yes, it would need to be of public benefit, but the utilities in this case have stated there would be no fiscal impact.

I do not understand what you mean by a pizza being "420"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2011, 09:36 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
A public improvement funded by the public. Something done by a private entity, no.

In the case of a regulated public utility, if it involves a cost that will impact their rates, then yes, it would need to be of public benefit, but the utilities in this case have stated there would be no fiscal impact.

I do not understand what you mean by a pizza being "420"
"No fiscal impact"? Are people volunteering their time, vehicles, and wires (or whatever they use) to do this? Doubtful. No such thing as a free lunch.




"420"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top