Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:23 AM
 
1,917 posts, read 5,344,339 times
Reputation: 829

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
Exactly.

Chances are, the owner of the car is probably the one driving.

If not, then the owner gets the ticket, figures out the ******* driving his car, then gets them to pay. No points, as we already discussed.

If you want to argue and say someone stole your car, then you have more problems than a $50.00 ticket.

The law is not about "Chances" and probability.
Crookhaven is 100% correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,141,481 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crookhaven View Post
How is that Constitutional?
The same as a parking ticket. It doesn't add points it just funds the police force a little more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:25 AM
 
7,658 posts, read 19,170,730 times
Reputation: 1328
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottzilla View Post
The law is not about "Chances" and probability.
Crookhaven is 100% correct.

Thanks Zilla.

For a minute there I thought we were in North Korea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:35 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crookhaven View Post
Ok one more time for the slow lane.

Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I wont debate this with you any further, you asked about the Constitutonal implications, I can only assume you arent from here.
Apparently you didn't read it, because the Wiki you linked to specifically says:

Quote:
Although the Constitution of the United States does not cite it explicitly, presumption of innocence is widely held to follow from the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. See also Coffin v. United States and In re Winship.
So I grabbed the text for these 3 amendments:

5th: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Where exactly does presumption of innocence come in to play with this amendment? A traffic citation is NOT a criminal charge, NOR does it require a grand jury. Having your vehicle flagged for going through a red light does not deprive you of your life, liberty or property without due process of law.


6th: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Again, this is not a criminal prosecution. You don't waive your right to a trial, you are simply cited and you can plead guilty or not guilty. Regardless, you ARE informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and ARE given evidence to show the violation.

14th: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Again, not deprived of life, liberty or property without due process. You are not waiving your rights.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.


Doesn't apply.



Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


Doesn't apply.


Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.


Doesn't apply.


Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


Doesn't apply.




So.... where are you saying you are presumed innocent and pictures of your car blowing a red light is a violation of the Constitution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Long Island,New York
8,164 posts, read 15,141,481 times
Reputation: 2534
In this country we are "guilty until proven innocent" otherwise you wouldn't go to jail until after your trial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:47 AM
 
7,658 posts, read 19,170,730 times
Reputation: 1328
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
Apparently you didn't read it, because the Wiki you linked to specifically says:



So I grabbed the text for these 3 amendments:

5th: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Where exactly does presumption of innocence come in to play with this amendment? A traffic citation is NOT a criminal charge, NOR does it require a grand jury. Having your vehicle flagged for going through a red light does not deprive you of your life, liberty or property without due process of law.


6th: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Again, this is not a criminal prosecution. You don't waive your right to a trial, you are simply cited and you can plead guilty or not guilty. Regardless, you ARE informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and ARE given evidence to show the violation.

14th: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Again, not deprived of life, liberty or property without due process. You are not waiving your rights.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.


Doesn't apply.



Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


Doesn't apply.


Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.


Doesn't apply.


Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


Doesn't apply.




So.... where are you saying you are presumed innocent and pictures of your car blowing a red light is a violation of the Constitution?

Anyone?

I'm all outta give a damn.

Kay ...wow, just wow.
Zealously advocating too.

What Country are you from again?
; )



Crooks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:52 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Fact of the matter is: presumption of innocence is for a criminal trial. A simple red light ticket is (a) not a criminal charge (b) not a trial-worthy offense (c) NOT a conviction, simply a citation (d) IMPOSSIBLE to track back to the driver.


Would you have this same idea for a parking ticket? They ticket the car, not the driver. If you lend your car out to someone and they get a parking ticket, is there some sort of Constitutional issue? It's the exact same thing: two minor traffic violations that you CAN plead not guilty to, both do NOT carry points, and both are MINOR non-moving violations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:53 AM
 
3,939 posts, read 8,972,586 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crookhaven View Post
What Country are you from again?

Here. I just know how to read some law. You are confusing "beyond a reasonable doubt", "burden of proof" and "innocent until proven guilty" quite loosely. Not everything applies everywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:54 AM
 
3,686 posts, read 8,704,930 times
Reputation: 1807
So Crooks...where did you get your JD degree from?....The Bill Gates Internet School of Law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2011, 08:56 AM
 
7,658 posts, read 19,170,730 times
Reputation: 1328
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayfouroh View Post
Fact of the matter is: presumption of innocence is for a criminal trial. A simple red light ticket is (a) not a criminal charge (b) not a trial-worthy offense (c) NOT a conviction, simply a citation (d) IMPOSSIBLE to track back to the driver.


Would you have this same idea for a parking ticket? They ticket the car, not the driver. If you lend your car out to someone and they get a parking ticket, is there some sort of Constitutional issue? It's the exact same thing: two minor traffic violations that you CAN plead not guilty to, both do NOT carry points, and both are MINOR non-moving violations.

A parked car is a matter of fact.

Implying Ive blown a red light is a matter of interpretation and to that end I am innocent until proven guilty.

I dont agree with you...and thats OK too.

This is a slippery slope for personal freedom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top