U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 02-06-2009, 09:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
991 posts, read 663,938 times
Reputation: 79
AlexisT will become famous soon enoughAlexisT will become famous soon enough
There are certain conditions under which "new" books end up having to be pulped, because they're obsolete or the district is required to replace them. But, I don't think that's really teacher waste.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2009, 10:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
386 posts, read 164,804 times
Reputation: 84
DeadPool1998 will become famous soon enoughDeadPool1998 will become famous soon enough
Default Precisely

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexisT View Post
There are certain conditions under which "new" books end up having to be pulped, because they're obsolete or the district is required to replace them. But, I don't think that's really teacher waste.
People have this idea that efficiency outweighs a rational and professional approach to a profession. You have committees established to develop and improve curriculum. But LongIslandMike thinks that using the books till they are tattered outweighs the reasoned judgment of professionals working in committee.

Don't people get tired of hearing the same arguments get retread year after year?

I still haven't heard anyone say a word linking consolidation to enhanced instruction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 04:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
398 posts, read 270,671 times
Reputation: 53
llama8 will become famous soon enoughllama8 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by longislandmike View Post
ANYONE have ANY stories of "waste" by teachers, school districts ?

I "heard" that teachers are instructed to destroy books and materials, at the end of EVERY YEAR or school session, so the school district has to buy ALL NEW materials, so the school district has to USE UP the money allocated for same !

It would be nice share ANY other stories, to illustrate brazen, school waste !
Really???? Which school is that??? I work in a public school and we are not even allowed to throw out textbooks that have broken into 3 pieces. Everything needs to be accounted for. (And I am in a pretty wealthy district) Budgets only allow for new books every 10+ years.

Are you sure that story is true or is it one of those rumors that people who know nothing about teaching like to spread??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 07:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
1,058 posts, read 964,619 times
Reputation: 162
nbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura about
Default the benefits outweigh the negatives

[quote=DeadPool1998;7347168]1) Your first point is crazy. Most of our teachers are women, and many of them are mothers with children in the system. The thought that teachers would see an advantage in being transferred across Suffolk County is an assertion from someone who knows nearly nothing about the system.

I never said anything about forced transfers, but rather giving teachers the option to transfer if they wanted to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:02 PM
Sarcasm mode:ON
Status: ""Whatever"" (set 12 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In my house
1,054 posts, read 408,214 times
Reputation: 145
hotkarl will become famous soon enoughhotkarl will become famous soon enoughhotkarl will become famous soon enough
For crying out loud, all they gotta do is implement the income based school tax and there'll be alot less complaining. Not "no" complaining, but alot less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
991 posts, read 663,938 times
Reputation: 79
AlexisT will become famous soon enoughAlexisT will become famous soon enough
And that's LI's problem in a nutshell: resistance to change, and somehow the perception that there's justice in a property tax based system.

The problem with an income based tax would be that it would be just as distortionary if it were implemented on a district-by-district basis, and if it were implemented as a standard rate countywide and disbursed proportional to enrollment, everyone would whine that it took local control away from budgeting and prevented local taxpayers from paying more for extras. There's a certain amount of merit to this argument--Prop 13 in CA, which shifted the burden of financing from property tax to the general pool, did a lot of bad things to schools and now parents are nickel-and-dimed to death for everything beyond basics (pay-to-play and fundraising), so the rich kids still get more than the poor ones. To some extent, though, this is because all the purse strings are in Sacramento.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
1,058 posts, read 964,619 times
Reputation: 162
nbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura aboutnbres has a spectacular aura about
Default The money has to be controlled by the county, not the state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexisT View Post
And that's LI's problem in a nutshell: resistance to change, and somehow the perception that there's justice in a property tax based system.

The problem with an income based tax would be that it would be just as distortionary if it were implemented on a district-by-district basis, and if it were implemented as a standard rate countywide and disbursed proportional to enrollment, everyone would whine that it took local control away from budgeting and prevented local taxpayers from paying more for extras. There's a certain amount of merit to this argument--Prop 13 in CA, which shifted the burden of financing from property tax to the general pool, did a lot of bad things to schools and now parents are nickel-and-dimed to death for everything beyond basics (pay-to-play and fundraising), so the rich kids still get more than the poor ones. To some extent, though, this is because all the purse strings are in Sacramento.

The only fair tax would be a progressive income tax levied on all county residents. The monies would be collected by the county and then redisbursed back to the schools on an equal per pupil spending criteria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
1,717 posts, read 613,404 times
Reputation: 268
Smash255 is a jewel in the roughSmash255 is a jewel in the roughSmash255 is a jewel in the roughSmash255 is a jewel in the roughSmash255 is a jewel in the roughSmash255 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbres View Post
The only fair tax would be a progressive income tax levied on all county residents. The monies would be collected by the county and then redisbursed back to the schools on an equal per pupil spending criteria.
The only issue I have with that is some districts do need extra $$ to deal with the various economic issues a district may have. Things along the lines of head start type programs, free & reduced lunches and stuff of that nature I think should not be counted in the per pupil spending in a district if your going to do something like that. If its going to remain based off property taxes than it should be an equal based tax rate countywide, the fact that some districts have double and in some cases more than double the tax rate of others is insane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:29 PM
Sarcasm mode:ON
Status: ""Whatever"" (set 12 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In my house
1,054 posts, read 408,214 times
Reputation: 145
hotkarl will become famous soon enoughhotkarl will become famous soon enoughhotkarl will become famous soon enough
I still get nickle and dimed to death. Every time I turn around I'm handing one of my kids a check for something or other at school, and I'm not talking about the bake sale
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 09:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
991 posts, read 663,938 times
Reputation: 79
AlexisT will become famous soon enoughAlexisT will become famous soon enough
You can't simply have equal per pupil spending, because of special education, LEP students, etc. It would have to be weighted, at the very least, and take account of student needs. A kid in a low-ratio class costs 2 or 3 times as much to educate as a kid in mainstream education.

The issue of local priorities is a very real one, and I'm not sure it has an easy answer. On the one hand, it's not fair that Great Neck can outspend Roosevelt because they can afford to raise more money. On the other hand, it's not really fair to hold one set back in the name of equality... and you have to draw the line on what you'll pay for, somewhere.

Hotkarl, my friends in CA have told me some pretty hair raising stories about what they're asked to pay for. The arts and music programs in many schools are entirely parent-funded; in others, parents are paying for smaller class sizes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Long Island

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top