![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
| View Poll Results: Do you make enough to qualify for a home loan in L.A.? | |||
| Do you personally earn over $110,000.00 per annum- YES |
|
57 | 28.93% |
| Do you personally earn over $110,000.00 per annum- NO |
|
140 | 71.07% |
| Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
[quote=OCCASparky;239487]To that end, it's a two-pronged effort on the state and federal levels. The federal government is charged with enforcing and securing the borders--fine. Let them do that. Keep new folks from coming in. No more anchor babies, etc. You drop a kid in the US--fine. They're a citizen, you're not, back to your country of origin you go.[quote]
Why don't we do what many countries in Europe are doing - babies born there aren't given automatic citizenship. They get that when they're 18. It might make illegal immigrants who are using "anchor babies" because they think it makes them un-deportable, think again. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Because of, IMHO, a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Sparky, hope you had a happy New Year!
I don't understand - do you mean it would be difficult to change the law, as it would require a constitutional amendment? That is difficult but doable. I think so many people are fed up - and particularly sickened by this one loophole that illegals take advantage of - that there would be a lot of support for it. The problem is, that both parties find it in their interest to encourage illegal immigration, so the average legal citizen or resident is effectively screwed. Where will our political "hero" come from? Somone who is not beholden to special interests, and who will recognize the turmoil these lax immigration policies are creating in our communities, nation-wide. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's amazing, really--I knew a guy when I was in the Navy who was as American as anyone, but he actually had to GET A WAIVER TO JOIN because he was born on a military base in Rota, Spain (to American parents, no less!). But we throw the doors open to those who would break our laws? Puh-leez. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Look tell your kids to live in areas that low class Hispanics, Blacks, Whites, Asians, etc. can't afford to live in. Because those people are the reasons why areas go to s@# in a major way. I can't wait for the LAPD and the Sheriffs to start erasing gangs forever. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Immigration was a major issue when the 14th Amendment was passed - complete with panics about Irish and German immigration comparable to the panics today about Latino immigration. So one can't say the writers of the 14th Amendment were unaware of consequences of "anchor babies"
Illegal immigration wasn't an issue, but mainly because there was no such legal concept as "illegal immigration" at the time. The US didn't have passports (only the Ottoman Empire and Russia did in the 19th century) and immigration controls were near nonexistent before 1905. Nevertheless I am not trying to equate 19th/early 20th century immigration with immigration today, because of the US population being much greater and resources being scarcer. This said, legal immigration is one thing, illegal another (and illegal immigration does tend to attract the worst elements of the society from which the are emigrating from) although there are exceptions. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As strange as it may sound, if the 20 million or so illegals had actually followed the process and entered this country legally, you know what? I'd be welcoming them with open arms. But such is not the case. The 14th Amendment, when ratified, never specifically addressed the "anchor babies" issue. Time to revisit that and ensure only those here LEGALLY can have children with automatic citizenship. If you're NOT here legally and have a child, you BOTH go back...the child's country of citizenship is the same as the mother's. Period. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And why should the citizenship be like that of the mother? Basing citizenship on the father's citizenship seems to be more common worldwide. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|