Los Angeles and the illegal immigration problem (rent, work)

[gfluneedit]

Originally Posted by gringo istmeño

The funny thing is, it is really irrelevant if they crossed by the land bridge or if they came in boats. Nowhere in your articles do they say the land bridge didn`t exist, nor that it wasn`t used. They only put time into question. So? !,000 years means really little in the span of 40,000, as far as our argument is concerned. They were still here first. They still come from Asia originally. That has been proven, DNA and fossils. Language (I don`t want to repeat the evidence I have sited- if you choose to ignore it, so be it)

As I said the problem is rooted in your lack of comprehension

Do I need to spell it for you.

The whole crux of the article is that the original DNA dating was incorrect making it virtual impossible for those people to have crossed that land bridge.

The would have had to swim across the bering strait.

OK I'm trying to teach you but I'm limited by your level of comprehension

Do you think indians are some sort of special swimmers ?

Of course it doesnt prove that a land bridge wasn't ever used ...because nothing can disprove that short of having 25,000 years of video showing that no one walked across the artic.

What it does disprove is the evidence you were banking on and puts everything back to where it was ....A THEORY

It's the LUCY of the bearing strait crossing.

You know what I'm referring to don't you ?

[gringo istmeño]

Originally Posted by gfluneedit

Correct, over the course of history the land belonged to many different groups , not just indians.

Presently it belongs to americans and mexicans have no rights here.

It belonged to one group, and it belonged to every individual- what other groups were there besides the Indians? They were all "Indians", different groups of Indians- and the land belonged to them. And they didn`t have a Mexico/America border- they were free to migrate. Now it belongs to the US. Tomorrow it will probably belong to the Mexicans again, who also have claim to Indian blood.

[gringo istmeño]

Originally Posted by gfluneedit

As I said the problem is rooted in your lack of comprehension

Do I need to spell it for you.

The whole crux of the article is that the original DNA dating was incorrect making it virtual impossible for those people to have crossed that land bridge.

The would have had to swim across the bering strait.

OK I'm trying to teach you but I'm limited by your level of comprehension

Do you think indians are some sort of special swimmers ?

Of course it doesnt prove that a land bridge wasn't ever used ...because nothing can disprove that short of having 25,000 years of video showing that no one walked across the artic.

No, but I have one for you- have you heard of boats?

[gringo istmeño]

Originally Posted by gfluneedit

As I said the problem is rooted in your lack of comprehension

Do I need to spell it for you.

The whole crux of the article is that the original DNA dating was incorrect making it virtual impossible for those people to have crossed that land bridge.

The would have had to swim across the bering strait.

OK I'm trying to teach you but I'm limited by your level of comprehension

Do you think indians are some sort of special swimmers ?

Of course it doesnt prove that a land bridge wasn't ever used ...because nothing can disprove that short of having 25,000 years of video showing that no one walked across the artic.

What it does disprove is the evidence you were banking on and puts everything back to where it was ....A THEORY

Wow you are really stubborn- you are the only one arguing the fact that it is a theory. I have in numerous posts referred to it as a theory. So you have now admitted that they very well may have (and accordfing to evidence) probably did cross the land bridge.
And no, I don`t know what you mean by the LUCY of the....?

[gfluneedit]

Originally Posted by gringo istmeño

No, but I have one for you- have you heard of boats?

I thought you just got done ranting about walking across as proven history rather than theory.

I think you better give the local LaRaza chapter a call and regroup a little.

[dusesean1986]

Hey I'm A White Guy In L.a.
Mexicans Can Be Here As Long As They Want...if They Need Money Or Just Wanna Hang Out Let Them Do Whatever They Want

[gringo istmeño]

Originally Posted by gfluneedit

I thought you just got done ranting about walking across as proven history rather than theory.

I think you better give the local LaRaza chapter a call and regroup a little.

You also have a short attention span, or maybe it is a reading disorder. That would explain a lot actually. Short term memory? Remember when I said it is irrelavent if they walked or boated? That the fact remains, they came from the same place? And that they were first? What difference does it make if they walked over 12,000 years ago or boated over 20,000 years ago? Did you learn that word "rant" from reading people`s responses to your posts?

[dusesean1986]

Hey I'm A White Guy In L.a. And I Have No Problem With Mexicans In California..that Is An Extremely Racist Point Of View That You Are Showing...it's Ok To Believe Something In A Nice Respectful Manner But The Way You Present It Has Gone Completely Overboard

[gfluneedit]

Originally Posted by gringo istmeño

Wow you are really stubborn- you are the only one arguing the fact that it is a theory. I have in numerous posts referred to it as a theory. So you have now admitted that they very well may have (and accordfing to evidence) probably did cross the land bridge.
And no, I don`t know what you mean by the LUCY of the....?

I did no such thing.

Again the problems here stem from you lack of comprehension

I never made any statement to the effect that I believe anyone crossed an artic land bridge.

All I said is that they have a theory and theory is not history.

They have no proof.

I find myself needing to spell things out, so I will again... I do not believe it to be plausable for ancient man to cross that land bridge and survive those conditions.

Furthermore the most important item is lacking...a civilization on the other side of the land bridge genetically linked to indians and contemporary to the land bridge !

None of it has been discovered.

But it's a theory none the less.

Theory is not fact.

And no, I don`t know what you mean by the LUCY of the....?

It was a scientific hoax that was perpetrated as proof of a missing link between ape and man, that was uncovered as a fraud.

Same as the DNA 'proof' you presented.

[dusesean1986]

Dude This Was Mexico's Land Before We Jacked This...i Got No Problem With People Comin' Over