Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2012, 11:43 AM
 
1,857 posts, read 3,077,739 times
Reputation: 1334

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Probably because she has to drive to the Westside for work most of the time. Right now from Manhattan Beach to West Hollywood is a 57 minute commute just to go 21 miles: Manhattan Beach, CA to West Hollywood, CA - Google Maps
The advice is being ignored because it is bad advice.
OP says she is self-employed with occasional meetings in West L.A. and WeHo. She says she is used to commuting. She is considering places like Thousand Oaks, Calabasas and Los Feliz. Do I need to link up the commute times for those places to West L.A. and WeHo? It's a 50 minute commute to WeHo right now per Google due to it being rush hour at its worst. It's currently 31 minutes to West L.A. If her meetings were ever held not around peak traffic times, the commute would be less. It's never taken me that long to go from MB to WeHo. Then again you're the guy who tried to tell us it was an hour and a half from MB to Hollywood not during rush hour. You'd be best served not confusing projected public transit route times with private driving route times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2012, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,762,419 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyway31 View Post
OP says she is self-employed with occasional meetings in West L.A. and WeHo. She says she is used to commuting. She is considering places like Thousand Oaks, Calabasas and Los Feliz. Do I need to link up the commute times for those places to West L.A. and WeHo? It's a 50 minute commute to WeHo right now per Google due to it being rush hour at its worst. It's currently 31 minutes to West L.A. If her meetings were ever held not around peak traffic times, the commute would be less. It's never taken me that long to go from MB to WeHo. Then again you're the guy who tried to tell us it was an hour and a half from MB to Hollywood not during rush hour. You'd be best served not confusing projected public transit route times with private driving route times.
And Thousand Oaks and Calabasas would be bad choices as well (even worse actually). With gas over 5.00 a gallon I'm not sure why you would want to live so far away from where you work when there are perfectly good options that are closer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 12:09 PM
 
2,720 posts, read 5,599,048 times
Reputation: 1320
The key to enjoying LA is to live close to work. Commuting sucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:03 PM
 
1,857 posts, read 3,077,739 times
Reputation: 1334
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarcelonaFan View Post
The key to enjoying LA is to live close to work. Commuting sucks.
I agree that commuting sucks. That's a part of L.A., though. People find the neighborhood that suits their interests, which is rarely where they work. The interests and profile created by the OP clearly points her to Manhattan Beach. What does she do if that is clearly the most appealing place to live but there is a bit of a longer commute? She may like Santa Monica. But then again she may decide that if she lives in a town with a beach she'd like to be able to make a short walk to the beach, rather than have a weird, long walk over a bridge and down a cliff crossing the Pacific Coast Highway. Point is, she should see for herself. For her to completely disregard Manhattan Beach sight unseen would be laughable. Certainly not unprecedented, but laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:29 PM
 
29 posts, read 53,143 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyway31 View Post

There can't possibly be a better place in the entire country for someone fitting this profile than what I've suggested. Money magazine agrees with me. Yet I have a feeling the suggestion will be completely disregarded nonetheless.
Manhattan Beach seems nice and everything except it's near Compton and Inglewood on the map. I don't want to take any chances at ALL. It's best for me to stay away from that area for peace of mind. I'm a scaredy cat, sorry. LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,762,419 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyway31 View Post
I agree that commuting sucks. That's a part of L.A., though. People find the neighborhood that suits their interests, which is rarely where they work. The interests and profile created by the OP clearly points her to Manhattan Beach. What does she do if that is clearly the most appealing place to live but there is a bit of a longer commute? She may like Santa Monica. But then again she may decide that if she lives in a town with a beach she'd like to be able to make a short walk to the beach, rather than have a weird, long walk over a bridge and down a cliff crossing the Pacific Coast Highway. Point is, she should see for herself. For her to completely disregard Manhattan Beach sight unseen would be laughable. Certainly not unprecedented, but laughable.
Another thing to keep in mind is this person is coming from Dallas and mentioned affordable in the OP - I wouldn't call the Beach Cities affordable, especially by North Texas standards. In fact it is prohibitively expensive - when a couple of my friends lived in Manhattan Beach off of PCH a couple of them had to take part-time jobs to supplement their income working for a major studio in West LA (yes they did that terrible commute and had to flex their schedules to make it work). Even this place was over a half mile from the beach, which is walking distance but not less convenient to the beach than using the stairways to walk to the beach. I have a hard time believing the OP is going to be able to afford the rents of the places right along the water, but maybe she could who knows.

Long commute, expensive gas in the region, very high rents are what make the Beach Cities seem like a bad choice compared to more inexpensive and proximate locations like Sherman Oaks or even Santa Monica (also very expensive).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:39 PM
 
29 posts, read 53,143 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueDat View Post
As an LA native who now lives in Dallas, you guys have given some good advice. But one thing that hasn't been mentioned is weather. I'm guessing after Dallas and its convection-oven summers, the OP probably wants to feel some of that sweet California relief. She's less likely to get that in Studio City and the San Fernando Valley in general than on the Westsode (Santa Monica, West LA, Miracle Mile) as the ocean breezes are blocked from getting into the Valley by mountains.

The microclimates of Southern California are not something a lot of Dallasites would be familiar with as, when it's hot in North Texas, it's hot everywhere. There are no mountains or big bodies of water to provide any kind of variety within the Metroplex like you get in LA. The difference between, say, Woodland Hills and Manhattan Beach on the same day can be dramatic. The difference between Plano and Duncanville here in North Texas, not so much.

So, if that's important to you, OP, stick with the Westside. In terms of weather, the Valley will feel closer to Dallas than the Westside will.

Yes, the weather here in Dallas is one reason for the move. I've read that the Valley area does get pretty hot and that's not what I'm needing. I'm looking forward to 70's and 80's during the summer not the normal Hell degrees of 108 in Dallas. You can't even function in weather that's 90 degrees or higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,762,419 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by abcnbccbs View Post
Manhattan Beach seems nice and everything except it's near Compton and Inglewood on the map. I don't want to take any chances at ALL. It's best for me to stay away from that area for peace of mind. I'm a scaredy cat, sorry. LOL!
No offense but if that is too proximate to ghettos for you good luck finding anywhere in Southern California to live. You are watching way too much TV if being within 5 miles of a (semi) ghetto area scares you off. Actually Compton and Inglewood are not that bad... Now I'm starting to think you should just suck up the commute and live in Calabasas (as that is one of the few places in SoCal isolated enough to be far, far from any "bad" areas. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Dallas has a worse crime rate than Los Angeles at this point - this isn't a dangerous city, especially for young, educated and (presumably) white females. If you were a poor Central American or a young black male in Florence-Firestone than maybe I would be more worried. You have nothing to worry about.

The Beach Cities are probably some of the most desirable and safe communities in the nation. As I mentioned I don't think they are a good fit for you, but not moving there for crime reasons... that is truly laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:45 PM
 
1,857 posts, read 3,077,739 times
Reputation: 1334
Quote:
Originally Posted by abcnbccbs View Post
Manhattan Beach seems nice and everything except it's near Compton and Inglewood on the map. I don't want to take any chances at ALL. It's best for me to stay away from that area for peace of mind. I'm a scaredy cat, sorry. LOL!
I figured it was something silly like this. That's why you have to visit. Manhattan Beach is arguably the wealthiest community in L.A. and home to many celebrities. You're going to be MUCH more impacted by crime and seedy areas in Hollywood or the Valley than you would be in Manhattan Beach. In those areas, things can be more block to block. Not so in MB. MB is impacted in no way by Compton.

In fact, I'd wager that the guys saying the commute to WeHO is too long etc would even concede that the Compton thing is a joke. Trust that if you ever visit MB, you will realize how silly you're comment is. You may indeed find that the commute is too long or another area is more to your taste. But you will also easily see that the Compton thing is a hilarious joke that will leave you red-faced upon recalling it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2012, 01:47 PM
 
1,857 posts, read 3,077,739 times
Reputation: 1334
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Another thing to keep in mind is this person is coming from Dallas and mentioned affordable in the OP - I wouldn't call the Beach Cities affordable, especially by North Texas standards. In fact it is prohibitively expensive - when a couple of my friends lived in Manhattan Beach off of PCH a couple of them had to take part-time jobs to supplement their income working for a major studio in West LA (yes they did that terrible commute and had to flex their schedules to make it work). Even this place was over a half mile from the beach, which is walking distance but not less convenient to the beach than using the stairways to walk to the beach. I have a hard time believing the OP is going to be able to afford the rents of the places right along the water, but maybe she could who knows.

Long commute, expensive gas in the region, very high rents are what make the Beach Cities seem like a bad choice compared to more inexpensive and proximate locations like Sherman Oaks or even Santa Monica (also very expensive).
OP is considering nothing but places that are expensive. And she's so set on moving to a nice neighborhood that looking on the map and seeing Compton is 5 miles away is too risky. LMAO. So, she's not looking for somewhere cheap. WeHo is not one iota cheaper than MB...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top