U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2018, 03:51 PM
 
3,951 posts, read 3,879,413 times
Reputation: 1792

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maliblue View Post
Mandarin-speaking Chinese are overwhelmingly the majority Asian group in SGV. In very distant second place are Cantonese-speaking Chinese (who actually have been here longer, in most cases). In third place, far behind the first two, are Vietnamese of Chinese heritage.

Comparatively, very few Asians from Japan or Korea reside in the SGV (those who do are clustered around Rowland Heights, where Chinese are an overwhelming majority as well; there is a sizable Korean community in Fullerton as well, which isn't SGV but is close to it). Overall, their numbers are negligible among Asians in SGV. I think if you asked anybody from Asia what ethnicity is predominant, they'd tell you Chinese.

Not every comment addressing race is intended in a racially insensitive way. However, if one is to discuss the demographics and social dynamics of the San Gabriel Valley, we can't simply ignore reality. It is part of our home town, after all.

The comment that seems to have offended you, noting that certain cities have become "Chinese or Asian", does not strike me as an offensive thing to say and should not be taken as such. I would describe much of the SGV as "Chinese or (other) Asian" and be quite accurate. I wish people wouldn't get so offended at the mere mention of race or demographics; how can we discuss it rationally if people are so easily offended?
The San Gabirel Valley is more Chinese but the Pomona Valley is becoming more South Asian.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2018, 04:02 PM
 
Location: So Ca
24,920 posts, read 23,102,487 times
Reputation: 22185
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsltd View Post
I bring this topic up because I have heard people refer to "cities in the San Gabriel Valley" that I have not really thought of as such.

Not sure if Diamond Bar or San Dimas should be in SGV or the Pomona Valley. The change in area code can throw one off plus there is a rise in elevation in both cities compared to everything west of them.
Remember that area code, zip code, ethnicity of residents in a city or cities, mountain ranges, or elevation have nothing to do with geographic divisions of a county. Many are based on Census tracts drawn up by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2018, 11:03 AM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,526,735 times
Reputation: 3236
The "other" valley lol, I wonder how it got backseat designation as they are both about the same size, and population, but the SFV is mostly in the City of LA. On google maps there's the terrain feature, and you can clearly see where the boundaries of the actual valley, and any other valley in this country persist.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2018, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Elysium
10,701 posts, read 6,456,914 times
Reputation: 7912
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
The "other" valley lol, I wonder how it got backseat designation as they are both about the same size, and population, but the SFV is mostly in the City of LA. On google maps there's the terrain feature, and you can clearly see where the boundaries of the actual valley, and any other valley in this country persist.
Two reasons. First most of the San Fernando Valley is inside of the City Of Los Angeles limits so there is no I'm not actually in LA discussions, even when the person pushes for a political separation. Secondarily the Valley Girl era in the 80's when white people of the City of Los Angeles had abandoned most of the city basin.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2018, 05:54 PM
 
Location: So Ca
24,920 posts, read 23,102,487 times
Reputation: 22185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
Two reasons. First most of the San Fernando Valley is inside of the City Of Los Angeles limits so there is no I'm not actually in LA discussions, even when the person pushes for a political separation. Secondarily the Valley Girl era in the 80's when white people of the City of Los Angeles had abandoned most of the city basin.
Burbank, Glendale, San Fernando, Calabasas, and Hidden Hills are actually independent cities lying within the San Fernando Valley. All others are districts of the city of Los Angeles. The San Fernando Valley was referred to as "the Valley" long before Frank Zappa wrote his Valley Girl song.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2018, 10:37 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,526,735 times
Reputation: 3236
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
Burbank, Glendale, San Fernando, Calabasas, and Hidden Hills are actually independent cities lying within the San Fernando Valley. All others are districts of the city of Los Angeles. The San Fernando Valley was referred to as "the Valley" long before Frank Zappa wrote his Valley Girl song.
THose combined communities only equal about a quarter of valley residents though.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2018, 11:37 PM
 
Location: NNV
3,433 posts, read 3,087,825 times
Reputation: 6703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coe View Post
The San Gabirel Valley is more Chinese but the Pomona Valley is becoming more South Asian.
I see you've taken your "wisdom" to Southern California now...
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 08:00 AM
 
Location: So Ca
24,920 posts, read 23,102,487 times
Reputation: 22185
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
THose combined communities only equal about a quarter of valley residents though.
That's why it said, "all others are districts of the city of Los Angeles."

Arleta
Cahuenga Pass
Canoga Park
Chatsworth
Encino
Granada Hills
La Tuna Canyon
Lake Balboa
Lake View Terrace
Mission Hills
NoHo Arts District
North Hills
North Hollywood
Northridge
Pacoima
Panorama City
Porter Ranch
Reseda
Shadow Hills+
Sherman Oaks
Studio City
Sun Valley
Sunland-Tujunga+
Sylmar
Tarzana
Toluca Lake
Valley Glen
Valley Village
Van Nuys
Warner Center
West Hills
Winnetka
Woodland Hills
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 01:48 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,526,735 times
Reputation: 3236
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
That's why it said, "all others are districts of the city of Los Angeles."

Arleta
Cahuenga Pass
Canoga Park
Chatsworth
Encino
Granada Hills
La Tuna Canyon
Lake Balboa
Lake View Terrace
Mission Hills
NoHo Arts District
North Hills
North Hollywood
Northridge
Pacoima
Panorama City
Porter Ranch
Reseda
Shadow Hills+
Sherman Oaks
Studio City
Sun Valley
Sunland-Tujunga+
Sylmar
Tarzana
Toluca Lake
Valley Glen
Valley Village
Van Nuys
Warner Center
West Hills
Winnetka
Woodland Hills
I'm well aware of this, it came across to me that you were trying to downplay the fact that the vast majority of the SFV is located within the city limits of Los Angeles. I already knew extensively winch communities are within the city, and which are their own municipalities, but still most is LA.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 05:41 PM
 
Location: So Ca
24,920 posts, read 23,102,487 times
Reputation: 22185
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
I'm well aware of this, it came across to me that you were trying to downplay the fact that the vast majority of the SFV is located within the city limits of Los Angeles. I already knew extensively winch communities are within the city, and which are their own municipalities, but still most is LA.
Slight case of projection there? Who would care whether a city or area is within the city of Los Angeles or outside of it?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top