![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
we are hiding. when we come out, people like to blame us a lot for stuff.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
i remember the cities of cudahy and bell gardens had mobile home parks full of white people!!!! but then in the late 80's and 90's they all moved to fontucky and areas out that way. also to the high desert. it seems they kinda disappeared...
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
*Raises hand*
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
As a side note, one of the most offensive terms, to me anyway, is "working class." At some point in time it seems to have replaced "blue collar." But if you're at an upper income level and working 60 or more hours per week, how is that not "working class?"
But I digress. You can find poor and middle class in every area of LA from downtown to South Central to Malibu to Manhattan Beach. Yes, many of the residents of the "upscale" neighborhoods are rich only by virtue of having lived in these areas since the beginning of time. But, unless they move, they're also on a limited, fixed income. I was at a luncheon today where a health care advocacy group stated that they advocate for 10-15 Manhattan Beach residents per month who cannot afford health care or the costs of basic medical services. Are folks of this type better off than the poor? Yes, in relative "house rich" terms. But many have no inclination to cash in on the rich property that they own and live hand to mouth as those in the poorest areas. For all of you Sociology doctorate hopefuls, seems that would make for a fascinating thesis. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Exactly my point. But if you research the term, you'll find that it generally refers to low income positions for the middle class. I suppose someone just decided that "blue collar" was no longer politically correct and decided upon a term that redefined those who work hard for a living and those who also work hard for a living and, for whatever reason, have been more successful.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well they live with the latinos!! :-))
that would be inner SFV or near downtown or east LA and west LA but not in Hollywood WEHO Westwood or Bev Hills. :-) Hollywood isnt affluent but they charge affluent area rates because of the ACTOR FACTOR :-D hey i just thought of that! lol but it is true! |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
They're not really in the city. Not full-blown neighborhoods, anyway.
Are you asking, in essence, are there 'South Boston' or 'South Philly' type neighborhoods in L.A.? Ultimately, no. There aren't. The demographics are totally different out here. But there are poor people here and there. I guess Tujunga would be the closest thing to what you're asking about. But for the most part you'll find them in Hemet, Barstow, San Bernardino, and places like that. Inland Empire. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some paockets of Culver City, Torrance, Lomita, El Segundo, Van Nuys, Tijunga, Sylmar, Sun Valley, Sunland, Buena Park
And many I.E communities such as Colton, Redlands, Upland, parts of Ontario and Rancho Cucumunga. And father out in high desert/antelope valley like Palmdale, Lancaster, Lake Los Angeles and Victorville. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|