Quote:
Originally Posted by drunk on kool aid
One of the things that I like about L.A. is that there is a large selection of housing styles in the county: bungalows, gobs of Spanish and Mediterranean, craftsman, Victorian, Tudor, mid-century modern, ranch. Yes, even dingbats, Tiki-styled apartments and McMansions and tons of others that I can't describe. The only types I don't recall seeing are brownstones and rowhouses.
Although there are clusters (e.g. bungalow row in Pasadena), these different styles can often be found next to each other, lending a very nice variety.
We have examples from some of the biggies: Lloyd Wright, Neutra, Schindler, Greene & Greene, Eames, Lautner.
I've had friends who have also commented on this variety but reading these forums, I see comments about L.A.'s boring and ugly architecture.
I'm a lifelong Angeleno who's hardly ever been out of the city so can someone comment on how L.A.'s residential architecture compares with those of other cities?
P.S. I'm not wondering about the L.A. skyline--although I like what is there, I know it's kinda wimpy.
P.P.S. Many of the various architectural styles were not beloved in their time but have come to be appreciated by at least a cult of aficionados. Will McMansions also come be regarded as one of the jewels in the L.A. residential setting?
|
As far as the skyline goes: the City couldn't build over 13 stories until the late 1960's because of earthquakes. That's why so many of those old buildings downtown are the same height- that's highest you could go! When I was a kid, the highest building was City Hall. We're still catching up.
And there are some brownstone-like apartments in Mid-Wilshire, and heading east into Koreatown. In fact, the apartment doubling as Seinfeld's is just west of Vermont, near Third Street. Though I don't know if that would be considered a brownstone.