Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-14-2008, 08:45 AM
 
1,831 posts, read 5,293,150 times
Reputation: 673

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
I still want to know why Los Angeles/SoCal housing prices jumped so much higher as a percentage than most of the rest of the country.

Access to the "funny loans" was everywhere. The mortgage rules are pretty much the same across the country. What was it about LA?

Why the huge increase in LA and not Denver (which is sort of representative of most of the country)?
It's pretty simple. More people want to live in LA and SoCal ... than want to live in Denver. Basic supply and demand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2008, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,748,294 times
Reputation: 17831
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheri257 View Post
It's pretty simple. More people want to live in LA and SoCal ... than want to live in Denver. Basic supply and demand.
If it is pure demand, why did the demand increase so much during the steepest positive slope of the curve? If it is pure demand, why all of a sudden in 2002 did people want to live in LA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 10:26 AM
 
1,297 posts, read 5,508,903 times
Reputation: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by orthopodfrancis View Post
Prices will always revert to the average. Take a look at the Case-Shiller graphs. L.A. is in one of the biggest housing bubbles in the last century. Prices are STILL 2-3X more than what they should be. Go look at some older pre-bubble house prices from 2000-2002.

Sustainable prices are typically 2.6-3 x the average income for an area, which in Los angeles - the average income is 48K dollars - there fore typical historical housing prices should average 150,000.

Santa Monica median household income is 75,000 - so average price should be around 225,000


There is a huge bubble, and it will likely be over in 2010, when all the Alt-A loans have reset (se Credit Suisse mortage graphs).

The ongoing recession, and possible upcoming depression may even further depress housing prices.

Expensive areas are being hit too, as Bev Hills/Pallisades are facing increasing short sales, and gasp! foreclosures.


Median prices going up, just reflect that the low end stuff is not selling, which means a troubled market.
If prices in santa monica drop to $225k, Many will be purchasing entire city blocks.

I see very few foreclosures in Palisades, Malibu, and Beverly Hills Most of the time they are on the market and sold at market price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,748,294 times
Reputation: 17831
Quote:
Originally Posted by greggd View Post
I see very few foreclosures in Palisades, Malibu, and Beverly Hills Most of the time they are on the market and sold at market price.

"Foreclosures, which had been almost unheard of in high-end markets a year ago, now account for a substantial share of listings. In Coto de Caza, where the average listing price is $2 million, 17% of the 167 homes for sale are either foreclosures or "short sales," in which the listing price is below the amount owed on the property, Thomas said.

In Mission Viejo and Laguna Hills, Thomas added, foreclosures and short sales make up more than 40% of the homes for sale."


"Median sale prices fell by 13% in Beverly Hills in April, compared with the same month last year. Rancho Palos Verdes dropped 18% over the same period, while Newport Beach's 92660 ZIP Code took a 34% hit, according to DataQuick Information Systems."

"Simon Lee, a commercial real estate investor who has been shopping for a house in Bel-Air, Pacific Palisades and Brentwood, said he believes that prices in those areas are still inflated in today's market.

"I think it needs a major adjustment, 25% or 30%," he said."



from

At the luxury end, home prices are falling - Los Angeles Times


(Use Bugmenot.com - login with these free web passwords to bypass compulsory registration for logins and passwords if necessary.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 04:31 PM
 
240 posts, read 889,026 times
Reputation: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheri257 View Post
It's pretty simple. More people want to live in LA and SoCal ... than want to live in Denver. Basic supply and demand.
Well, it's not that simple or basic. No one should believe that the housing bubble was caused simply by "supply and demand".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 04:44 PM
 
1,831 posts, read 5,293,150 times
Reputation: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterMark View Post
Well, it's not that simple or basic. No one should believe that the housing bubble was caused simply by "supply and demand".
Ok but ... the question was why prices rose so much higher in LA than Denver. To me, the answer would be obvious ...

It's LA ... for crying out loud. People were obviously willing to borrow through the roof for LA ... not for Denver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 09:01 PM
 
1,297 posts, read 5,508,903 times
Reputation: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
"Foreclosures, which had been almost unheard of in high-end markets a year ago, now account for a substantial share of listings. In Coto de Caza, where the average listing price is $2 million, 17% of the 167 homes for sale are either foreclosures or "short sales," in which the listing price is below the amount owed on the property, Thomas said.

In Mission Viejo and Laguna Hills, Thomas added, foreclosures and short sales make up more than 40% of the homes for sale."


"Median sale prices fell by 13% in Beverly Hills in April, compared with the same month last year. Rancho Palos Verdes dropped 18% over the same period, while Newport Beach's 92660 ZIP Code took a 34% hit, according to DataQuick Information Systems."

"Simon Lee, a commercial real estate investor who has been shopping for a house in Bel-Air, Pacific Palisades and Brentwood, said he believes that prices in those areas are still inflated in today's market.

"I think it needs a major adjustment, 25% or 30%," he said."



from

At the luxury end, home prices are falling - Los Angeles Times


(Use Bugmenot.com - login with these free web passwords to bypass compulsory registration for logins and passwords if necessary.)
Interesting..and while dataquick is reliable source of real estate info, I have been continously watching certain select areas of west la and haven't really found any change in pricing from last year to this year. I notice these articles always sneak a common/tract name neighborhood or two in order to cover their bases and to dilute everything to match their theory.

I'm really just looking at certain sections of Malibu, Brentwood, and Pac Pal So my comments are really based on a much smaller community.
I will say that there are a few homes I've looked at that have been on the market for a 4+ months now.. Totally overpriced in comparison to other homes on the market and even in comparison to homes that were on the market in 07 and 06.

I would be happy to see a 30% reduction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2008, 09:12 PM
 
1,316 posts, read 3,904,597 times
Reputation: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheri257 View Post
Ok but ... the question was why prices rose so much higher in LA than Denver. To me, the answer would be obvious ...

It's LA ... for crying out loud. People were obviously willing to borrow through the roof for LA ... not for Denver.

there's no accounting for insanity..hahaha..I lived in Los Angeles for 7 years - was just awful..I woulnd't live there if they were GIVING the stuff away...and I lived in Santa Monica - not exactly the dumps..and I still hated it...move there only if you like passive aggressives, lots of traffic, and relentless sun and smog...at any price it's a bad deal...the ONLY2 things I miss are the fresh fruits and veggies from the farmers market and my shiatsu masseur...thats it...lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2008, 05:56 AM
 
1,831 posts, read 5,293,150 times
Reputation: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by greggd View Post
I have been continously watching certain select areas of west la and haven't really found any change in pricing from last year to this year.

I will say that there are a few homes I've looked at that have been on the market for a 4+ months now.. Totally overpriced in comparison to other homes on the market and even in comparison to homes that were on the market in 07 and 06.
I don't follow LA that closely but, generally, I've noticed the same thing. If prices are "holding" it tends to be only one or two sales. Nothing else is moving. If properties are moving in greater numbers then, that's when you tend to see the price drops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2008, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,748,294 times
Reputation: 17831
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheri257 View Post
I don't follow LA that closely but, generally, I've noticed the same thing. If prices are "holding" it tends to be only one or two sales. Nothing else is moving. If properties are moving in greater numbers then, that's when you tend to see the price drops.
We've noticed this too.

The neighborhood where we moved from, Lang Ranch in Thousand Oaks, is outstanding. Very family, beautiful, excellent schools. We drove around there last week (we still have friends and family there). Nothing at all for sale. Its zip code code 91362 median prices have fallen 21% (Dataquick) since last year but in the Lang Ranch neighborhood there is nothing for sale. Nothing. People aren't selling.

We definitely noticed this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top