U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 03-18-2011, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
25,695 posts, read 40,175,602 times
Reputation: 14505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exposay View Post
We live in thousand oaks and did during the northridge earthquake...lost exactly one candy dish. Thousand oaks did not take a big hit.
I remember the supermarket at Janss and Moorpark had a lot of broken windows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 03-19-2011, 01:05 AM
 
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
12,984 posts, read 17,055,566 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamaTex View Post
Like somebody mentioned earlier, I'd stay clear of areas that would be prone to liquefaction.
The thing is, you never know where the fault lines are that could cause a "big" earthquake.

An area that I KNOW that is not safe or is prone to liquidfaction in the valley is between Ventura Blvd and Magnolia from about Sepulveda blvd in Sherman Oaks all the way east to Vineland in NoHo/Studio City area. That area is horrible when it comes to liquidfaction but is desirable by all the "transplants" who move here to work in the entertainment field. That area is to be avoided if at all possible by renters/apartment hunters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-19-2011, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
4,750 posts, read 7,882,668 times
Reputation: 4973
This is correct. Most of the buildings on Willis Ave. north of Ventura Blvd. were heavy damaged in the Northridge quake, as were a lot of apartments along Dickens (south of and parallel to Ventura Blvd.). I'm not aware of any buildings along Magnolia that took a heavy hit, though.

The problem is that these apartments were built on the old L.A. River bed, which is a known liquefaction zone.

I just found this earthquake liquefaction map, and even though it's a huge file, it's worth looking at. It seems that most of the communities along the 101 in the San Fernando Valley are affected, from the San Monica Mountains all the way up to Vanowen St.

(Well, I used to feel somewhat safe... *sigh*)

http://emergency.lacity.org/pdf_lhmp...uake_Part2.pdf

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaoTzuMindFu View Post
The thing is, you never know where the fault lines are that could cause a "big" earthquake.

An area that I KNOW that is not safe or is prone to liquidfaction in the valley is between Ventura Blvd and Magnolia from about Sepulveda blvd in Sherman Oaks all the way east to Vineland in NoHo/Studio City area. That area is horrible when it comes to liquidfaction but is desirable by all the "transplants" who move here to work in the entertainment field. That area is to be avoided if at all possible by renters/apartment hunters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-19-2011, 11:01 PM
Status: ""American Taliban"" (set 5 days ago)
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA.
17,663 posts, read 3,316,504 times
Reputation: 3408
The whole LA basin and the valleys are criss-crossed with faults. The "BIG ONE" will most likely occur on the San Andreas fault which runs along the northern edge of the San Gabriel mountains. As the Japan earthquake showed, the fault considered most dangerous did not produce that earthquake. I personally wouldn't be comfortable in coastal areas due to the tsunami threat - why not live in Lancaster or Palmdale where your are right on the SA fault! Also read Mike Davis's book "Ecology of Fear" - besides earthquakes - LA has been assailed with mudslides, fire, flood, riots, and even tornados! Living in Los Angeles means being surrounded by incredible natural beauty - but nature tends to bite back. I don't think it is a bad tradeoff. Don't worry about the "Big One" - just be happy about whereever you choose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-20-2011, 04:00 AM
 
2,815 posts, read 3,030,222 times
Reputation: 1425
Caveat: The schools are bad, and the neighborhood is in decline, although its not THAT bad...certainly safer than most parts located within City of Los Angeles.

The part of Rosemead I grew up in is located on a large slab of granite. This area is basically the hill that San Gabriel Bl runs through from the 60 Fwy to somewhere around Paramount Bl.

On one of the maps someone provided, its just outside the liquifaction zone.

The 1987 6.0 Whittier Narrows earthquake had an epicenter very close to there.....around 1/2 mile away I believe....and stuff fell off the shelf but thats about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-20-2011, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,385 posts, read 1,337,014 times
Reputation: 850
I suggest Colorado.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-28-2011, 03:20 PM
 
125 posts, read 170,881 times
Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
The whole LA basin and the valleys are criss-crossed with faults. The "BIG ONE" will most likely occur on the San Andreas fault which runs along the northern edge of the San Gabriel mountains. As the Japan earthquake showed, the fault considered most dangerous did not produce that earthquake. I personally wouldn't be comfortable in coastal areas due to the tsunami threat - why not live in Lancaster or Palmdale where your are right on the SA fault! Also read Mike Davis's book "Ecology of Fear" - besides earthquakes - LA has been assailed with mudslides, fire, flood, riots, and even tornados! Living in Los Angeles means being surrounded by incredible natural beauty - but nature tends to bite back. I don't think it is a bad tradeoff. Don't worry about the "Big One" - just be happy about whereever you choose.
I think there's something to be said about living east of the San Andreas fault. I recently watched an earthquake program on TLC that discussed the differences of the faults and how that effects things. They say the San Andreas fault is a slip strike fault; meaning its moving northwest, but that old saying about California falling into the ocean makes me think that the fault won't behave as scientist have predicted and a large part of the area west of the fault will somehow be lost during the "Big One."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 03-28-2011, 04:17 PM
 
Location: 7th Level of Hell
15,360 posts, read 13,140,891 times
Reputation: 14033
Quote:
Originally Posted by apollyoncruiser View Post
They say the San Andreas fault is a slip strike fault...
Right-lateral strike-slip.

Quote:
Originally Posted by apollyoncruiser View Post
meaning its moving northwest
The reason they say it: because it's true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by apollyoncruiser View Post
but that old saying about California falling into the ocean makes me think that the fault won't behave as scientist have predicted and a large part of the area west of the fault will somehow be lost during the "Big One."
Keep deluding yourself. Did you know that the Easter Bunny will be here soon? He's pink and blue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2012, 01:04 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,060 times
Reputation: 10
I lived in Rowland Heights during the Northridge quake. We felt a small amount of wavy movement, but nothing else. My office was in El Monte. One jar of instant coffee fell off the top shelf. Being plastic, it did not break.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-10-2012, 01:52 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
7,056 posts, read 7,582,561 times
Reputation: 4521
Quote:
Originally Posted by profit101 View Post
I lived in Rowland Heights during the Northridge quake. We felt a small amount of wavy movement, but nothing else. My office was in El Monte. One jar of instant coffee fell off the top shelf. Being plastic, it did not break.
Wow, I was 10 and lived in Corona, and I got thrown off my bed!
__________________
Moderator for Los Angeles, The Inland Empire, the Washington state forums, & Co-Mod for the North Dakota forums
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top