U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Unread 12-29-2008, 10:49 PM
 
1,397 posts, read 4,238,996 times
Reputation: 876
Question Rate Los Angeles County's Public Transportation System

From a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the worst and 10 being the best), rate Los Angeles County's public transportation system. Additionally, how dependable is it? What are the shortcomings to the system?
Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 12-29-2008, 11:59 PM
 
636 posts, read 1,525,298 times
Reputation: 231
I'd rate LA's transportation system a 7 out of 10. The 'subway' system is nice... that's the red, blue, gold, orange line system. The shortfall of the system is due to the layout of LA. LA is so sprawling it's difficult for the system to cover the area. To get from here to there, a commuter usually has to transfer between rail lines and buses.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 12:16 AM
 
147 posts, read 225,962 times
Reputation: 57
On the average, -3. It only works halfway decent if you happen to live walking distance from a main line, Metrolink or if you park and ride. Other than that it's purely a novelty.

So tell me LALady do you rely on the Metro as your primary mode of transportation?
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 02:07 AM
 
Location: Burbank
1,204 posts, read 2,314,304 times
Reputation: 387
For my situation.... a 10! Drive to Universal, park free, redline to 7th/Metro.
In general.... a 7. For what they have, it is run very well. It's clean, fairly reliable, and you can get pretty much anywhere one way or another. It's not NYC subway, but it can't be... LA is too big.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 02:17 AM
 
636 posts, read 1,525,298 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Raul View Post
On the average, -3. It only works halfway decent if you happen to live walking distance from a main line, Metrolink or if you park and ride. Other than that it's purely a novelty.

So tell me LALady do you rely on the Metro as your primary mode of transportation?
Nope but I have used the metro to commute from time to time. As I said, you have to combine the metro with a transfer to/from a busline. thousands of people use it daily.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 09:30 AM
 
147 posts, read 225,962 times
Reputation: 57
Interesting, there was a stretch when I had to rely on Mass Transit in L.A., I can't count on both hands and feet how many times the bus was late or never showed, how many times a bus driver blew by me, resulting in my missing the connecting bus, or how many times I had to ride a bus in +90 temperatures without AC and open windows.

This was a 15 minute commute which took 01;15;00 by bus.

Metro Transit definitely goes out the way to cater to those in more influential densely populated areas, while they let the rest of the system go to hell and tell the working class who rely on it the most to eat cake.

It's so L.A.

Last edited by Radical Raul; 12-30-2008 at 09:39 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 09:42 AM
 
Location: LA
5,581 posts, read 8,382,355 times
Reputation: 2085
the bus system is actually quite useful if your commute is no more than 5 miles or so and you don't have to transfer more than once. i've used the busses on the westside a quite a bit and it definitely works if you need it to work for you. i've also used the rails, which are much more convenient, but there aren't any on my side of town. the problem, as others has mentioned, is that LA is a huge city. I would venture to say that the large majority of people don't live within 5-10 miles of their work. there is also this idea here that you are less of a person if you don't have a car. some people are effected by this, others not so much.

bottom line, if you have to commute across the city everyday and local busses are your only option, you will probably not see the system in a positive light. however, if you are able to utilize the city's rail systems or express busses, odds are you'll think its pretty good.

with that said, i think a 6 would be a good number to rate LA's transit. once the expo line gets to santa monica and the subway is extended west, it could easily get up to an 7 or 8. however, a 9 or 10 rating is a long way off. there will need to be much more rail connectivity for this to happen in my mind.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 09:54 AM
 
147 posts, read 225,962 times
Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRinSM View Post
bottom line, if you have to commute across the city everyday and local busses are your only option, you will probably not see the system in a positive light. however, if you are able to utilize the city's rail systems or express busses, odds are you'll think its pretty good.
This is a contradiction and you also need to point out Santa Monica operates it's own bus system which is much better than the L.A. Metro system.

If you can park and ride, take the Metrolink, you can do ok if you don't mind sometimes having to stand, but if you rely solely on public transit expect long commutes, delays, and to be treated rudely by the Metro drivers.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 10:12 AM
 
Location: LA
5,581 posts, read 8,382,355 times
Reputation: 2085
i don't see the contradiction.

also, when taking the busses, i prefer the metro rapid routes over the big blue routes. most, if not all of the big blue bus routes serve communities in the city of LA, so i think it is fair to lump big blue bus service in the LA transit system, just like metrolink or the blue, green, and gold lines.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 12-30-2008, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
2,498 posts, read 6,139,984 times
Reputation: 1446
I would rate Los Angeles public transportation a 6/10. It is not on the level of Chicago, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Washington DC, or Philadelphia [all older and more established cities, mainly in Northeast]. It is much better in L.A. than places like Houston, Dallas, Austin, Phoenix, Miami, Las Vegas, San Diego, Charlotte, Indianapolis, etc...

L.A. public transport is about midpack with cities like Portland, Seattle, St. Louis, or Cincinnati.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top