U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
AnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant future
Default Study: Los Angeles is the second least "manly" city in the U.S.

Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?

The ten least manly cities:

1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento

The ten most manly cities:

1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed

Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 08:08 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hampton Cove, Huntsville, AL
12,143 posts, read 11,356,990 times
Reputation: 3131
Charles has a reputation beyond repute
Charles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond reputeCharles has a reputation beyond repute
You could almost replace "manly" with "unaffordable" for some reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
251 posts, read 148,721 times
Reputation: 160
Todd.LA has a spectacular aura aboutTodd.LA has a spectacular aura aboutTodd.LA has a spectacular aura aboutTodd.LA has a spectacular aura about
This study was commissioned by the makers of COMBOS brand bacon, egg, and cheese crackers, the "Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR." Unsurprisingly their criteria skewed towards redneck-oriented cities. I agree that LA should be proud to be on the bottom of the list. The least "manly" cities are among the most vibrant cities in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 10:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
AnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant future
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.

And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2009, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
888 posts, read 717,565 times
Reputation: 446
pbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nice
notice how five of the cities on the list are in california? the creators of this "study" must think that the golden state is filled with granola-eating, birkenstock-wearing, flower power hippies and/or "q.ueer eye/project runway" metrosexual types.

in all seriousness, the list seems to insinuate that "cosmopolitan" = "unmanly". perhaps the high concentration of frozen yogurt shops bumped LA up a few notches?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
AnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant future
Notice, also, that they listed San Francisco as the #1 "emasculated" city.

Hmm. Playing into stereotypes for the NASCAR crowd? I'm shocked! Shocked, I say!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:03 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: los angeles
5,033 posts, read 2,914,974 times
Blog Entries: 2
Reputation: 1070
happ has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud ofhapp has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.

And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
yeah, I guess "manly" means stock cars\ chain saws\ beer & pig rind
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
888 posts, read 717,565 times
Reputation: 446
pbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nicepbergen is just really nice
the funniest of the criteria used to determine the "winners" of this study Moderator cut: was the Manly “Kryptonite” Category / Emasculating Criteria

scroll to the bottom of the page, where you'll see the rankings for this category.

so as the owner of a honda who regularly patronizes coffeeshops and sushi restaurants, i guess i'm a prime contributor to an entire metropolitan area's decidedly unmasculine lifestyle?

also, notice how san francisco and oakland are ranked 1 and 2 amongst metro areas for "emasculating criteria". since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?

i guess the creators of this study really hate the bay area and/or the west coast and northeast?

i mean, surely they're not a tad biased?

Last edited by Dark of the Moon; 03-17-2009 at 12:57 AM.. Reason: Copyright issues -- please post only a sentence or two (or a link) -- thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:19 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
AnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant futureAnUnidentifiedMale has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbergen View Post
since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?
That's definitely strange. It makes it look like a sloppy study. Oakland and San Francisco actually are considered to be separate "metropolitan divisions" by the Census Bureau, but then so are Los Angeles and Orange County, which they obviously did not separate as two distinct places.

I'll forgive them. I'm sure they were drunk on Schlitz Beer and Cheetos when they did their research.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:23 AM
Far from perfect but still better than YOU!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
7,074 posts, read 5,398,298 times
Reputation: 3792
LaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond reputeLaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond repute
LaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond reputeLaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond reputeLaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond reputeLaoTzuMindFu has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?

The ten least manly cities:

1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento

The ten most manly cities:

1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed
Notice how the "Manly" cities are much less affordable (i.e., much less desirable) than the "least manly cities". Property values, cost of living and overall desireability seems to be some other of the distinguishing characteristics of the least manly locations.

Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 08:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top