|

03-16-2009, 10:40 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
|
|
Study: Los Angeles is the second least "manly" city in the U.S.
Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?
The ten least manly cities:
1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento
The ten most manly cities:
1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed
Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 08:08 AM..
|
|

03-16-2009, 10:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hampton Cove, Huntsville, AL
12,143 posts, read 11,356,990 times
Reputation: 3131
|
|
|
You could almost replace "manly" with "unaffordable" for some reason.
|
|

03-16-2009, 10:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
251 posts, read 148,721 times
Reputation: 160
|
|
|
This study was commissioned by the makers of COMBOS brand bacon, egg, and cheese crackers, the "Official Cheese-Filled Snack of NASCAR." Unsurprisingly their criteria skewed towards redneck-oriented cities. I agree that LA should be proud to be on the bottom of the list. The least "manly" cities are among the most vibrant cities in the US.
|
|

03-16-2009, 10:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
|
|
|
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.
And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
|
|

03-16-2009, 11:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
888 posts, read 717,565 times
Reputation: 446
|
|
|
notice how five of the cities on the list are in california? the creators of this "study" must think that the golden state is filled with granola-eating, birkenstock-wearing, flower power hippies and/or "q.ueer eye/project runway" metrosexual types.
in all seriousness, the list seems to insinuate that "cosmopolitan" = "unmanly". perhaps the high concentration of frozen yogurt shops bumped LA up a few notches?
|
|

03-17-2009, 12:02 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
|
|
Notice, also, that they listed San Francisco as the #1 "emasculated" city.
Hmm. Playing into stereotypes for the NASCAR crowd? I'm shocked! Shocked, I say! 
|
|

03-17-2009, 12:03 AM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: los angeles
5,033 posts, read 2,914,974 times
Reputation: 1070
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
Reading the criteria, it's actually a pretty funny study. I hope that was their intention. I would daresay it's even a little campy.
And notice how they were very careful not to mention anything gay as being a detractor from "manliness". That's good. I've always worried that my subscription to Inches Magazine would detract from my manliness. Now I feel better.
|
 yeah, I guess "manly" means stock cars\ chain saws\ beer & pig rind 
|
|

03-17-2009, 12:12 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
888 posts, read 717,565 times
Reputation: 446
|
|
the funniest of the criteria used to determine the "winners" of this study Moderator cut: was the Manly “Kryptonite” Category / Emasculating Criteria
scroll to the bottom of the page, where you'll see the rankings for this category.
so as the owner of a honda who regularly patronizes coffeeshops and sushi restaurants, i guess i'm a prime contributor to an entire metropolitan area's decidedly unmasculine lifestyle?
also, notice how san francisco and oakland are ranked 1 and 2 amongst metro areas for "emasculating criteria". since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?
i guess the creators of this study really hate the bay area and/or the west coast and northeast?
i mean, surely they're not a tad biased? 
Last edited by Dark of the Moon; 03-17-2009 at 12:57 AM..
Reason: Copyright issues -- please post only a sentence or two (or a link) -- thanks!
|
|

03-17-2009, 12:19 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palm Springs, CA
11,497 posts, read 2,892,719 times
Reputation: 1715
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbergen
since when were sf and oakland considered part of two separate areas?
|
That's definitely strange. It makes it look like a sloppy study. Oakland and San Francisco actually are considered to be separate "metropolitan divisions" by the Census Bureau, but then so are Los Angeles and Orange County, which they obviously did not separate as two distinct places.
I'll forgive them. I'm sure they were drunk on Schlitz Beer and Cheetos when they did their research.

|
|

03-17-2009, 12:23 AM
|
|
Far from perfect but still better than YOU!!
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal - Sherman Oaks & Woodland Hills
7,074 posts, read 5,398,298 times
Reputation: 3792
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale
Looking at the criteria used, I take it as a compliment. Which category would you prefer?
The ten least manly cities:
1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Portland
5. Chicago
6. Washington, D.C.
7. Oakland
8. San Diego
9. Miami
10. Sacramento
The ten most manly cities:
1. Nashville
2. Charlotte
3. Oklahoma City
4. Cincinnati
5. Denver
6. St. Louis
7. Columbus
8. Kansas City
9. Indianapolis
10. Toledo
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitors sites is not allowed
|
Notice how the "Manly" cities are much less affordable (i.e., much less desirable) than the "least manly cities". Property values, cost of living and overall desireability seems to be some other of the distinguishing characteristics of the least manly locations.
Last edited by Yac; 04-06-2009 at 08:07 AM..
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|