|

04-10-2007, 02:19 PM
|
|
East Meets West
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
5,221 posts, read 3,573,967 times
Reputation: 1970
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion
Does this help?
|
No, I'm not confused. I am aware of what the U.S. Census defines as the NY Metro area. What I'm saying is that the article (as far as I saw--I may have missed it) doesn't say what its criteria were in stating the NY Metro area. These could have been two different things. It is, of course, possible, but not definite, as far as I can see, that the writer of the article was going off traditional (census) data. Journalists attempt to be as factual as possible, but they do indeed spin, usually to get a better story. Having been a journalist for years, this much I can put forth as fact.
|
|

04-10-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rolando, San Diego CA 92115
5,097 posts, read 5,316,907 times
Reputation: 1221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ
No, I'm not confused. I am aware of what the U.S. Census defines as the NY Metro area. What I'm saying is that the article (as far as I saw--I may have missed it) doesn't say what its criteria were in stating the NY Metro area. These could have been two different things. It is, of course, possible, but not definite, as far as I can see, that the writer of the article was going off traditional (census) data. Journalists attempt to be as factual as possible, but they do indeed spin, usually to get a better story. Having been a journalist for years, this much I can put forth as fact.
|
I think the point is that if you are going to talk about wealth in NYC but exclude Port Washington, Great Neck, Glen Cove, or Greenwich, you're not really painting an accurate picture.
|
|

04-10-2007, 02:50 PM
|
|
Ballroom Diva
Status:
"I'm outta here"
(set 8 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
11,484 posts, read 6,792,305 times
Reputation: 7656
|
|
|
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles? Maybe we should change the name of the thread to something with New York in the title. Just a thought.
|
|

04-10-2007, 02:51 PM
|
|
East Meets West
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
5,221 posts, read 3,573,967 times
Reputation: 1970
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassberto
I think the point is that if you are going to talk about wealth in NYC but exclude Port Washington, Great Neck, Glen Cove, or Greenwich, you're not really painting an accurate picture.
|
I actually thought the point was originally the opposite. The original complaint was that too MUCH of NY was included, and too LITTLE of LA, and that was apparently why New York was cited as having a higher percentage of millionaires. The original argument was that LA had more millionaires per head, but that too little of Southern California was represented and that was why NY "appeared" to have more. That was actually what I was arguing against.
|
|

04-10-2007, 02:53 PM
|
|
East Meets West
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
5,221 posts, read 3,573,967 times
Reputation: 1970
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles? Maybe we should change the name of the thread to something with New York in the title. Just a thought.
|
I do think it was relevant to bring up the subject of other millionaire-rich (har! Get it? Okay, never mind) areas, since the argument was that LA was more desirable than other areas, the apparent evidence being that there are "more" millionaires in LA than other cities (or counties). If that evidence is flawed, certainly it is on-topic.
|
|

04-10-2007, 03:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
95 posts, read 128,723 times
Reputation: 62
|
|
Its per capita, not total that is what counts, bud.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion
LA County is home to more millionaires than any other county in the United States with a whopping 262,800 millionaire households! (and this does not include the value of one's primary residence)
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news.../millionaires/
If LA is as bad, dangerous, and gang infested as some people on this forum claim, why do the most financially successful and affuent in the land continue to call LA home?
|
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??
|
|

04-10-2007, 03:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
95 posts, read 128,723 times
Reputation: 62
|
|
Its per capita, not total that is what counts, bud.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion
LA County is home to more millionaires than any other county in the United States with a whopping 262,800 millionaire households! (and this does not include the value of one's primary residence)
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news.../millionaires/
If LA is as bad, dangerous, and gang infested as some people on this forum claim, why do the most financially successful and affuent in the land continue to call LA home?
|
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??
|
|

04-10-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
990 posts, read 1,597,801 times
Reputation: 546
|
|
|
less millionaires (per capita) ...
Would that confirm that Angelenos 'look' like they have more money than they actually make?
|
|

04-10-2007, 11:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: City of Angels
1,250 posts, read 1,288,933 times
Reputation: 459
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justabystander
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??
|
Per capita data is not relevant to this conversation. The survey in question was dealing with the actual number of millionaire households not percentage of households. Obviously the larger the population the smaller the percentage of millionaire households and the smaller the population the larger the percentage of millionaire households. Rancho Santa Fe, CA has the highest or nearly the highest per capita millionaire households in the US. But there are only 3000 residents. So what!
Last edited by TheRealAngelion; 04-10-2007 at 11:39 PM..
|
|

04-10-2007, 11:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: City of Angels
1,250 posts, read 1,288,933 times
Reputation: 459
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles?
|
YES! I think that question has been answered by numerous posts already. Basically, wealthy people like LA and think its a great place to live, especially if you are wealthy. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|