U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.

Get a detailed profile of any city, county, or zip code:
      Search our forums (advanced):

Reply

 
Old 04-10-2007, 02:19 PM
East Meets West
Status: "Multitasking: Work and Play" (set 13 days ago)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
4,084 posts, read 1,248,159 times
Reputation: 1548
JerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion View Post

Does this help?
No, I'm not confused. I am aware of what the U.S. Census defines as the NY Metro area. What I'm saying is that the article (as far as I saw--I may have missed it) doesn't say what its criteria were in stating the NY Metro area. These could have been two different things. It is, of course, possible, but not definite, as far as I can see, that the writer of the article was going off traditional (census) data. Journalists attempt to be as factual as possible, but they do indeed spin, usually to get a better story. Having been a journalist for years, this much I can put forth as fact.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 02:32 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rolando, San Diego CA 92115
3,212 posts, read 1,869,851 times
Reputation: 579
Sassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to allSassberto is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
No, I'm not confused. I am aware of what the U.S. Census defines as the NY Metro area. What I'm saying is that the article (as far as I saw--I may have missed it) doesn't say what its criteria were in stating the NY Metro area. These could have been two different things. It is, of course, possible, but not definite, as far as I can see, that the writer of the article was going off traditional (census) data. Journalists attempt to be as factual as possible, but they do indeed spin, usually to get a better story. Having been a journalist for years, this much I can put forth as fact.
I think the point is that if you are going to talk about wealth in NYC but exclude Port Washington, Great Neck, Glen Cove, or Greenwich, you're not really painting an accurate picture.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 02:50 PM
Dancing Queen
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Palm Desert, CA aka "Heaven"
3,520 posts, read 1,369,235 times
Reputation: 1620
Twinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant futureTwinkle Toes has a brilliant future
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles? Maybe we should change the name of the thread to something with New York in the title. Just a thought.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 02:51 PM
East Meets West
Status: "Multitasking: Work and Play" (set 13 days ago)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
4,084 posts, read 1,248,159 times
Reputation: 1548
JerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassberto View Post
I think the point is that if you are going to talk about wealth in NYC but exclude Port Washington, Great Neck, Glen Cove, or Greenwich, you're not really painting an accurate picture.
I actually thought the point was originally the opposite. The original complaint was that too MUCH of NY was included, and too LITTLE of LA, and that was apparently why New York was cited as having a higher percentage of millionaires. The original argument was that LA had more millionaires per head, but that too little of Southern California was represented and that was why NY "appeared" to have more. That was actually what I was arguing against.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 02:53 PM
East Meets West
Status: "Multitasking: Work and Play" (set 13 days ago)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
4,084 posts, read 1,248,159 times
Reputation: 1548
JerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant futureJerZ has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes View Post
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles? Maybe we should change the name of the thread to something with New York in the title. Just a thought.
I do think it was relevant to bring up the subject of other millionaire-rich (har! Get it? Okay, never mind) areas, since the argument was that LA was more desirable than other areas, the apparent evidence being that there are "more" millionaires in LA than other cities (or counties). If that evidence is flawed, certainly it is on-topic.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 03:00 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
72 posts, read 46,702 times
Reputation: 42
Justabystander is on a distinguished road
Default Its per capita, not total that is what counts, bud.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion View Post
LA County is home to more millionaires than any other county in the United States with a whopping 262,800 millionaire households! (and this does not include the value of one's primary residence)

http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news.../millionaires/

If LA is as bad, dangerous, and gang infested as some people on this forum claim, why do the most financially successful and affuent in the land continue to call LA home?
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 03:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
72 posts, read 46,702 times
Reputation: 42
Justabystander is on a distinguished road
Default Its per capita, not total that is what counts, bud.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion View Post
LA County is home to more millionaires than any other county in the United States with a whopping 262,800 millionaire households! (and this does not include the value of one's primary residence)

http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news.../millionaires/

If LA is as bad, dangerous, and gang infested as some people on this forum claim, why do the most financially successful and affuent in the land continue to call LA home?
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 05:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
990 posts, read 801,260 times
Reputation: 499
newportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of lightnewportbeachsmostwanted is a glorious beacon of light
less millionaires (per capita) ...
Would that confirm that Angelenos 'look' like they have more money than they actually make?

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 11:26 PM
Senior Member
Status: "I'm Voting for THAT ONE!" (set 3 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: City of Angels
1,048 posts, read 536,778 times
Reputation: 309
TheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justabystander View Post
I read the same article. Cook County, Illinois, has far more millionaires per capita, even though it is number two behind LA. So do some of the other counties, such as Nassau on Long Island, and Middlesex in Mass. You can empty your delusions of grandure down the sink, LA is nothing special, only packed with people. Does the same theory include the most gangs and low income residents, or most illegal aliens??
Per capita data is not relevant to this conversation. The survey in question was dealing with the actual number of millionaire households not percentage of households. Obviously the larger the population the smaller the percentage of millionaire households and the smaller the population the larger the percentage of millionaire households. Rancho Santa Fe, CA has the highest or nearly the highest per capita millionaire households in the US. But there are only 3000 residents. So what!

[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by TheRealAngelion; 04-10-2007 at 11:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Old 04-10-2007, 11:33 PM
Senior Member
Status: "I'm Voting for THAT ONE!" (set 3 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: City of Angels
1,048 posts, read 536,778 times
Reputation: 309
TheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the roughTheRealAngelion is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinkle Toes View Post
I hate to interrupt, but wasn't this thread supposed to be about why wealthy people like Los Angeles?
YES! I think that question has been answered by numerous posts already. Basically, wealthy people like LA and think its a great place to live, especially if you are wealthy.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads

Forum Jump