|

09-23-2009, 05:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
423 posts, read 280,150 times
Reputation: 259
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian08
Hey folks, I can't figure this out. I love this pic, but how is it that this huge mountain behind the skyline is prominent in this pic and missing in most. Does this mountain rise and fall like the moon or work part time or what?
(wikimedia pix)
Compare that to this or many others -

|
The only time you will see it like that is after a big storm, And it will last only a few days before the smog returns.
I think you will fined that picture No. 1 is a scan from a post card and not the real Los Angeles. The other is more every day life.
|
|

09-23-2009, 05:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
322 posts, read 129,967 times
Reputation: 148
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian08
Hey folks, I can't figure this out. I love this pic, but how is it that this huge mountain behind the skyline is prominent in this pic and missing in most. Does this mountain rise and fall like the moon or work part time or what?
|
Those mountains are real. Saw them many times from the rooftop of the building I used to live-in in downtown LA.
The haze and smog do block them to varying degrees. But plenty of clear days esp. in fall and winter (after a good rainstorm). The snow on the mountains indicate this was taken after a storm (rain in the flats, snow in the mountains). Always brushes the sky clean.
|
|

09-23-2009, 05:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CITY OF ANGELS AND CONSTANT DANGER
4,374 posts, read 2,106,201 times
Reputation: 1373
|
|
|
its the angle!!!
look how close the aon and first interstate building are in the top pic. then look at the other two.
its pretty simple.
the mountains are in fact THAT close.
|
|

09-23-2009, 05:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pasadena
547 posts, read 400,617 times
Reputation: 236
|
|
|
Not a phony picture, just a rare one that uses a little photo trickery with a telephoto to make the mountain look much closer. Top photo is taken from somewhere probably in the Pico-Union neighborhood (maybe Vermont and the 10 Freeway) and is looking east-north-east. Actually it might be even further south than that. You can see the convention center in the lower right hand part of the picture for perspective. The mountain in the back is Mt. Baldy I think which is far to the east of LA.
The other photos are taken from a different area and are looking more easterly or south easterly. Looks like the photos are taken from somewhere in the MacArthur Park area (so to the north of where the first photo is taken). Both of the second and third photo appear to be taken from the same spot, just a little more telephoto in the last one.
|
|

09-23-2009, 05:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Valencia,CA>Hauser Lake,ID
546 posts, read 312,018 times
Reputation: 214
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetscenes
Not a phony picture, just a rare one that uses a little photo trickery with a telephoto to make the mountain look much closer. Top photo is taken from somewhere probably in the Pico-Union neighborhood (maybe Vermont and the 10 Freeway) and is looking east-north-east. Actually it might be even further south than that. .
|
I have seen a couple of references to that particular shot being from Kenneth Hahn Park.
|
|

09-23-2009, 06:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pasadena
547 posts, read 400,617 times
Reputation: 236
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elousv
I have seen a couple of references to that particular shot being from Kenneth Hahn Park.
|
Thanks for that, I think you are correct. Los Angeles Skyline.jpg photo - Lloyd Prudhomme photos at pbase.com
That's how the photographer got the elevation to make the downtown skyline look "under" the mountain. I was headed in the right direction, just not far enough south or west.
|
|

09-23-2009, 06:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LA
183 posts, read 45,881 times
Reputation: 43
|
|
|
Yes it is real. I have an older one from the 1949 big snow.
With enough altitude or distance you can get a clue as to how high the San Gabriel mountains really are compared to the city which sits down in our low basin.
Great isnt it?
|
|

09-23-2009, 07:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
304 posts, read 233,611 times
Reputation: 185
|
|
|
The 2 most recognizable landmarks are the convention center and city hall and they line up with each other. If you draw a line through those two and extend it farther in each direction, you end up with Kenneth Hahn State Park to the south and Mt Waterman directly behind the LA skyline.
Using a very long telephoto lens makes everything look compressed... like it is on top of each other.
|
|

09-23-2009, 07:44 PM
|
|
currently in denile
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California
1,576 posts, read 1,313,102 times
Reputation: 565
|
|
|
I have been up on the 30th floor of different buildings and seen the mountains just like that. Often with a great rainbow. The El Nino years help.
|
|

09-23-2009, 10:49 PM
|
|
Now Ex-Bostonian in DFW
Status:
"Back from LA - great trip! :-)"
(set 20 hours ago)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
1,528 posts, read 1,288,579 times
Reputation: 650
|
|
Well good work people, I think this mystery is solved. Photo taken from Kenneth Hahn Park - a distance of about 8 miles, using a long telephoto lens which has the effect of making things look like they are right on top of each other. Very cool! 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|