U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 10-18-2009, 09:35 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
1 posts, read 379 times
Reputation: 10
mistychristy is on a distinguished road
Default Woodland Hills or Sherman Oaks?

Sorry for another "where to live in LA" question, but everyone seems very helpful so here goes:

Two questions, actually:

*I'm moving from out of state and will be working in Westlake Village. I'm young, single, and rent isn't too much of an issue. Research so far shows Sherman Oaks and Woodland Hills look like the best bet to balance nightlife/things to do, and commute. Is that right, or am I overlooking any better options?

*Does anyone know of any newer/modern complexes in SO or WH? I've seen a few online (Magnolia at Sherman Oaks, Triana, Carillon), but haven't seen anything good, bad or otherwise about them. Advice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2009, 09:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
342 posts, read 86,285 times
Reputation: 86
osuzana will become famous soon enoughosuzana will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistychristy View Post
Sorry for another "where to live in LA" question, but everyone seems very helpful so here goes:

Two questions, actually:

*I'm moving from out of state and will be working in Westlake Village. I'm young, single, and rent isn't too much of an issue. Research so far shows Sherman Oaks and Woodland Hills look like the best bet to balance nightlife/things to do, and commute. Is that right, or am I overlooking any better options?

*Does anyone know of any newer/modern complexes in SO or WH? I've seen a few online (Magnolia at Sherman Oaks, Triana, Carillon), but haven't seen anything good, bad or otherwise about them. Advice?
Hi MC,

Not a big nightlife in the Valley I am afraid. Lot's of dining options and a few small publike clubs with music. Not sure where you are moving from, but the Valley is not known for an exciting nightlife and everything is pretty dead during the week.
Good place to live if you are single is Warner Center. It's like a city within the Valley. High rises, restaurants, lot's of shopping, movies and parks to walk to. I don't know if there are any clubs to dance anymore in the Valley or Warner Center to tell you the truth.
Westlake Village makes you feel safer and it is and has a few club venues where big name acts play like in Agoura and possibly in Westlake but these are bedroom communities so it is a bit quiet. You would find really nice rentals in Westlake right by the water within walking distance to the Westlake Promenade, shopping, movies...just like Warner Center without the high rise buildings or city feel. Where is WLV will you be working?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 05:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles
347 posts, read 149,617 times
Reputation: 160
Island_OnThe_Land has a spectacular aura aboutIsland_OnThe_Land has a spectacular aura aboutIsland_OnThe_Land has a spectacular aura aboutIsland_OnThe_Land has a spectacular aura about
Given where you plan on working (Westlake Village), I think you have picked two good spots. That said, I think SHERMAN OAKS is the BETTER option of the two for a young single person. Of course, it's also a longer commute than Woodland Hills.

There are several newer (good quality) apartment complexes in the Warner Center area (which is really a part of Woodland Hills). I think one is called the Pointe.

Sherman Oaks does not have as many new complexes because it's a more established area (read: it got built out years ago so there is not much new land). That said, you can find some nice places to rent (apartment, condos, etc). However, they tend to be smaller properties as compared to the larger "institutional" complexes you'll find in the Warner Center/Woodland Hills area.

You might try looking up Amalfi at Sherman Oaks. I think that is one larger apartment complex in a very good location. Building is probably 20 yrs old but probably still in good condition.....

Good luck.

Yes, Sherman Oaks and Woodland Hills are much more "boring" than the rest of LA proper (read: Hollywood, Santa Monica, etc). However, SHerman Oaks is a very nice community and very well located for a young single person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2009, 07:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Officially own a home (first home) in NoHo Arts District as of August 30, 2009.
187 posts, read 102,375 times
Reputation: 66
LABornandRaised will become famous soon enoughLABornandRaised will become famous soon enough
I've lived in both Sherman Oaks and Woodland Hills. Sherman Oaks tend to be for the younger crowd, while Woodland Hills is more family oriented. WH is definitely a lot closer to Westlake Village than Sherman Oaks. Woodland Hills reminds me of a more suburban, get to know your neighbor community, moreso than S.O.

If I may over generalize, I'd say S.O. is more tied to Studio City and Hollywood; while W.H. is more closely connected with Agoura Hills and Westlake Village. Very different types of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2009, 07:16 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
46 posts, read 52,598 times
Reputation: 32
strategery52 is on a distinguished road
Lucky you, you have a reverse commute each day! For nightlife and attractions you'll be heading along Ventura Blvd either way. Not nearly as much to do as there is in the 323/310, but def more than in Westlake Village. I'd personally want to minimize the commute as much as possible and would look more toward Woodland Hills/Calabasas. You could also compromise and go for Tarzana!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2010, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top