Probably a question most for Tomocox or STYX.
I have noticed following the local news for Oldham County a lot of battles over growth issues with developers. Is there a controlled growth plan in Oldham County? I have seen what it is like to have a area build up too fast here in Thousand Oaks, CA. Just read about how the school district is attempting to plot out spots for future schools before the developers get a hold of it.
Where we live currently, they definitely are building way too fast for the road infrastructure. One thing I do like though over here is when a developer is given the go on a new area, they area also responsible for creating a large usable park/open space nearby, as well as if the size of the new development is large, nearby amenities and a school are also part of the plan for it to be acceptable.
Now I know no one can hold back growth, but there definitely should be some control of that growth. The Napa Valley in Northern California [also lived there for awhile] had a very hard-line on growth, only allowing a few new homes to be built each year. It has kept there smaller town feel longer than surrounding areas like Fairfield, Vallejo, ect.
I would worry about being someone who wants to move and buy a home with some land around it, only to see that open area nearby sold by the owner and turned into a track home complex or apartments.
I have read this problem has already been happining around Lexington with farms selling out to developers, which really makes the area start to lose it's charm. Let me know your thoughts and some facts. Thanks!