U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 12-06-2007, 08:30 PM
Trolls hate me.
Status: "ticking off Trolls, one at a time" (set 26 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Michigan
7,379 posts, read 4,753,792 times
Reputation: 7506
Bydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond repute
Bydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond repute
I knew a little old lady up by Caribou who I think could remember Jesus while he was in diapers. She wouldn't tell her age of course because that wasn't lady like. We put electricity into her home back in 89, she never had it until then. At the same time the company my brother was working for pulled her hand pump and installed a new water pump and put in an indoor toilet and running water. She was so happy the first time she turned the tap and had hot water right there, no going to the well house and pumping a bucket of water then stoking the wood stove and waiting. Her pump would always freeze in the winter and she would walk a mile with her snowshoes to the nearest neighbor to get 2 buckets of water from them, then they would drive here back home. She got a small check from the state and was worried about paying for the work we were doing (somehow I lost the rest of the bill ), but never asked for anything and wouldn't go to several agencies for additional help. She retired from teaching in 1929 and was quite proud to show you her teaching supplies she kept, "just in case I wanted to go back." She graduated from the teaching college right at the end of "The big one" so that had to be 1918 or so I would think.

Now, you just don't see that kind of steadfastness, or that independence. I see too many people who are so young and healthy with their hand out and thinking they are entitled to something. NO, you are not! I want to shout at them, the older folks like Miss. Monson are entitled, deserving, needing. But they are not the ones getting it, perfectly healthy kids who would think they need to start out in a $50,000 a year job or it is beneath them, are the ones who are getting it mostly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2007, 10:32 PM
There's no R in Acadia!!!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The northern end of a rock in the Atlantic Ocean (Maine)
1,395 posts, read 1,056,842 times
Reputation: 1232
deerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud ofdeerislesmile has much to be proud of
Northern Maine Land Man- Do you have a link to that info or happen to know the LD#? I would be interested to know if those numbers are supposed to represent average benefits or maximum benefits, whether they are per household or per participant and what fiscal year they represent, etc.

The numbers seem really off (as in, the amount of food stamps to that household would actually be much more, and that households cannot participate in some of those (major) programs at the same time) and I would like to know more about how they were calculated and in what context they were presented to/from the Legislature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2007, 10:42 PM
Botda Farm :D
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine
6,519 posts, read 2,615,757 times
Reputation: 6712
msina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond repute
msina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond repute
Myth:
Maine’s TANF benefits are too generous and encourage people to move to Maine from other states.
Fact:
Maine’s maximum monthly TANF benefit is the very lowest in New England. Maine’s maximum benefit for a family of three is $485/month, which is only 34% of the poverty level($1431/month). Even when food stamps are added, TANF families reach only 65% of thepoverty level.Data from the state’s Department of Health and Human Services clearly illustrates thatpeople are not moving to Maine for our benefits.


TANF: Maine’s Welfare Program Fact Sheet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 07:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northern Maine
2,897 posts, read 1,683,902 times
Reputation: 1619
Northern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant futureNorthern Maine Land Man has a brilliant future
"whether they are per household or per participant and what fiscal year they represent, etc. "

As in my original post it is for a household with a single parent with 2 kids. This data is three years old from 2004 and benefits have increased since then. TANF does vary from state to state. The key word in TANF is 'temporary'. When benefits run out in Massachusetts people come to Maine. W#hyen they run out in Maine they might need to go to another state, but there are a multitude of extenuating and mitigating circumstances that alow benefits to continue. There are also programs not included in the chart such as LIHEAP. We had a lady in town living in an older mobile home and the state bought her a brand new mobile home. It happens.

Each of the programs above was enacted by either a separate bill or part of the overall budget. Somebody interested enough could research the actual LD numbers. To contact an expert, just call one of the many agencies under the DHHS umbrella. They run the system and the system depends on recruitment. Without recruitment the system would not exist.

Last edited by Northern Maine Land Man; 12-07-2007 at 07:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 08:19 AM
Botda Farm :D
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine
6,519 posts, read 2,615,757 times
Reputation: 6712
msina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond repute
msina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond reputemsina has a reputation beyond repute
Hi NMLM! I understand your point, it's something that does happen, however I don't think there are many people here in Maine making a living on public assistance. I did see some information on the house replacement program you reffered to as well.


HUD Grant to Help Mobile Homeowners
9/12/2007--Owners of older, substandard mobile homes will be assisted through a major initiative serving the communities of Brownville, Milo, Lagrange, and Alton. Penquis has received approval for a $300,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. .... more

Penquis | Helping Today - Building Tomorrow


These homes had to be pre 1978 mobile homes, the goal was to replace seven homes with the 300k they had for the program. Good article thanks for mentioning the story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 10:32 AM
"status" from Dale Carnegie
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: a step from New Brunswick...
6,956 posts, read 3,259,255 times
Reputation: 4645
mollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond repute
mollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond reputemollysmiles has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to mollysmiles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Maine Land Man View Post
"whether they are per household or per participant and what fiscal year they represent, etc. "

As in my original post it is for a household with a single parent with 2 kids. This data is three years old from 2004 and benefits have increased since then. TANF does vary from state to state. The key word in TANF is 'temporary'. When benefits run out in Massachusetts people come to Maine. W#hyen they run out in Maine they might need to go to another state, but there are a multitude of extenuating and mitigating circumstances that alow benefits to continue. There are also programs not included in the chart such as LIHEAP. We had a lady in town living in an older mobile home and the state bought her a brand new mobile home. It happens.

Each of the programs above was enacted by either a separate bill or part of the overall budget. Somebody interested enough could research the actual LD numbers. To contact an expert, just call one of the many agencies under the DHHS umbrella. They run the system and the system depends on recruitment. Without recruitment the system would not exist.
I get that the numbers are old...but you still haven't said where you got them....and they're not accurate. Also, you may have found them somewhere in an article that is old, but in fact the numbers quoted there could be even older--that's not unusual as it takes some time for numbers to be gathered in things like this.

Would you like me to just google it? I understand that you may not remember...and that's not a slam, I just know sometimes we look a variety of places
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
35 posts, read 42,998 times
Reputation: 26
ShaneOsborne is on a distinguished road
Hey guys,
I am very happy to be here and yes I'm fairly new the the forum.

This links ranks states by per capita STATE AND LOCAL spending on Welfare. The data is old...1997-- Maine is #2.: Just The Facts 2001 - Table 44, State and Local Welfare Spending Per Capita, 1997

This is an interesting blog that ranks Maine at one of the top 15 Welfare Queen States. This article is hard to read and crazy harsh and unrefined, but this is how Maine gets it reputation whether the information is correct or not.:
Silflay Hraka: The Top 15 State Welfare Queens

The following link shows that Maine is 2nd only to Vermont regarding its combined state and local tax burden when compared to other states. 2nd highest is not something the state can be proud of. It is not because Maine is a rural state or because Maine is a northern state. Massachusetts rands 28th highest and Kentucky 20th highest.

These are some very scary statistics. It is this kind of information that makes it scary for me to move back....though I do LOVE it and miss it.

Maine ranks better when you add federal taxes, but 10th is still very high.
The link is: The Tax Foundation - State and Local Tax Burdens Compared to Other U.S. States, 1970-2007
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 03:17 PM
See ya'll in the Spring
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV and Eastport Maine
1,057 posts, read 598,333 times
Reputation: 948
corgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to beholdcorgis is a splendid one to behold
I knew WV would rank right up there at the top. The 5 year benefits cap was put in place because generations of WVians grew up knowing from an early age they would be on welfare just like those before them.

You should have heard the ruckus when the 5 year cap was started. Most didn't believe they'd be cut off and yep, cut dead off at the end of the 5 years cause they didn't get schooling or training for a skill.

I personally applaud a state who has the gumption to help people get on their feet through training and/or schooling and even help the recipients find jobs. But, by golly, it sure did raise a big stink here when it was enacted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 03:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Auburn, Maine
1,265 posts, read 962,338 times
Reputation: 758
flycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to beholdflycessna is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneOsborne View Post
Hey guys,
I am very happy to be here and yes I'm fairly new the the forum.

This links ranks states by per capita STATE AND LOCAL spending on Welfare. The data is old...1997-- Maine is #2.: Just The Facts 2001 - Table 44, State and Local Welfare Spending Per Capita, 1997

This is an interesting blog that ranks Maine at one of the top 15 Welfare Queen States. This article is hard to read and crazy harsh and unrefined, but this is how Maine gets it reputation whether the information is correct or not.:
Silflay Hraka: The Top 15 State Welfare Queens

The following link shows that Maine is 2nd only to Vermont regarding its combined state and local tax burden when compared to other states. 2nd highest is not something the state can be proud of. It is not because Maine is a rural state or because Maine is a northern state. Massachusetts rands 28th highest and Kentucky 20th highest.

These are some very scary statistics. It is this kind of information that makes it scary for me to move back....though I do LOVE it and miss it.

Maine ranks better when you add federal taxes, but 10th is still very high.
The link is: The Tax Foundation - State and Local Tax Burdens Compared to Other U.S. States, 1970-2007
Thats an incredible amount of money to be spending especially on a per capita basis because when you factor in what people in Maine are making compared with Ma, and NY Maine is actually spending way more. I have heard NH has like 60 thousand people on Medicaid and Maine has 280 thousand.

P.S. I use to live in klingle road behind the zoo. I left 95 after barry came back to office

Last edited by flycessna; 12-07-2007 at 03:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2007, 04:00 PM
Bees? Not in Maine
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argyle, Maine
11,627 posts, read 6,585,109 times
Reputation: 2836
forest beekeeper has a reputation beyond repute
forest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond reputeforest beekeeper has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneOsborne View Post
The following link shows that Maine is 2nd only to Vermont regarding its combined state and local tax burden when compared to other states. 2nd highest is not something the state can be proud of. It is not because Maine is a rural state or because Maine is a northern state. Massachusetts rands 28th highest and Kentucky 20th highest.

These are some very scary statistics. It is this kind of information that makes it scary for me to move back....though I do LOVE it and miss it.

Maine ranks better when you add federal taxes, but 10th is still very high.
The link is: The Tax Foundation - State and Local Tax Burdens Compared to Other U.S. States, 1970-2007
If you read a it deeper into the threads here you will find that we have discussed the 'tax burden' issue a lot.

Statistic data bases are often misleading. There are obviously instances where a person can move to Maine and experience a much lower tax 'burden' than if he lived in most other states.

However by completely following such a WWW database it would imply that such were not possible.

Also 'tax burden' re-indexes the numbers in favour of average household income.

Assuming that everyone in Maine earned that one income level, and that we as a group paid all of those taxes, then and only then would such a comparison be valid.

Maine simply does not have the highest income tax as compared to the remaining 49 states. The highest tax bracket is 9.9%

Maine's highest bracket is 8.5% and even then your 'taxable' income must have exceeded the amounts of both your standard deductions and your exemptions, and then your remaining 'taxable' income must be enough to get up into the highest tax bracket.

Maine does not have the highest fuel taxes, nor the highest property taxes, nor, .... Do you see a pattern here?

I do understand that misery likes company. And that folks like to whine together in the company of others who are also whining about the same topic.

As for having the highest taxes, sigh, let it go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top