Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighter 1
Just wondering what was the differance in taxes ??
|
The numbers are different for each county.
Say that you owned 1,000 acres of forest, in 'treegrowth', and that it is assessed at $100 an acre.
1,000 acres of UT land assessed as mixed-species at $100/acre, and in a county with a mil rate of 0.00852, would pay $852.00 property taxes each year.
Without a 'treegrowth' program available, that same land could be assessed at $10,000 an acre, and the annual tax bill could be $85,200
Or depending on recent real estate transactions in the area, each acre could be assessed at $20,000; so your taxes could be $170,400.
A person owning a 1,000 acre tract of land, using it for timber production would never be able to produce $85k worth of timber per year. So it would be chopped up as tract housing the following year. There would no longer be a forest.
The only way to make it possible for land owners to keep their land in forest. Is to keep their land tax assessments low.
When one person buys one acre of land, a wonderful vacation spot, and he pays $40,000 for that acre. The tax assessor sees that and 'adjusts' all other land in the area accordingly. You may have been assessed at $1,000 per acre before. But now he says the market value is $40,000 per acre, so your tax assessment is $40,000 per acre. That one sale, can spike your tax assessment, and spikes your property taxes. When assessed values go up by 40X, so your taxes will go up by 40X.
Without a 'treegrowth' program, there would not be any undeveloped land in Maine.
In my case. I paid $900 per acre to buy this land, and my taxes have been working out to be about $1.05 per acre.
The land that I took out of 'Treegrowth' status is now taxed at $850 per acre.
By taking an acre out of 'treegrowth' the taxes on that acre are now nearly equal to the purchase price of that land. [in the context that $850 is near to $900]