|

02-09-2009, 10:23 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: eastern Hancock County
1,114 posts, read 933,404 times
Reputation: 1070
|
|
Guantanamo to Maine?
I have just received a telephone call from Senator Collins' office in Washington. In response to an email that I had sent the senator regarding moving the Guantanamo detainees to a new Federal facility to be built at the former Loring AFB, I was told that Maine is NOT currently one of the states under consideration for such a facility.
|
|

02-09-2009, 10:52 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
620 posts, read 588,609 times
Reputation: 243
|
|
|
That would have been major climate shock -- Cuba to northern Maine!
Does anyone know if the control tower and landing field equipment at Loring is still intact? The FAA used to send someone up there every few months from Bangor to maintain the equipment, but that was years ago. And what about the underground command post?
|
|

02-09-2009, 10:57 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennebec County, Maine
86 posts, read 39,869 times
Reputation: 69
|
|
|
Good for Collins for responding. Bad for Collins for not making sure that our state was considered.
Good for you for trying.
What difference does climate make? Everyone is inside all the time.
|
|

02-09-2009, 11:04 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine
5,031 posts, read 3,390,317 times
Reputation: 1708
|
|
I would think that strict confinement would feel the same no-matter where you are. 
|
|

02-09-2009, 11:47 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Well Downeast
1,030 posts, read 422,645 times
Reputation: 412
|
|
|
Good for Collins if she made sure we were off the list. I think it would be a mistake. Remember what caused the raid on Entebe? Terrorists trying to get terrorists released. In my opinion it would bring involvement in something akin to that. And before it's said that that would not happen; no one dreamed of airplanes in the towers either. I think not having them is a good thing despite losing possible jobs.
|
|

02-09-2009, 11:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: eastern Hancock County
1,114 posts, read 933,404 times
Reputation: 1070
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coaster
That would have been major climate shock -- Cuba to northern Maine!
Does anyone know if the control tower and landing field equipment at Loring is still intact? The FAA used to send someone up there every few months from Bangor to maintain the equipment, but that was years ago. And what about the underground command post?
|
When I was organizing a high speed time trial at Loring ten years ago, I had a full tour of the airfield. Our event lease would have included the airfield and certain other buildings including the control tower. I went to the top of the control tower...which by the way, is ten stories tall...and got a great bird's eye view of everything. But the control tower itself was completely empty.
I assume the ILS equipment including glide slope and all other electronic gear has long since been removed. I do know that at some point there was some heavy aircraft engine contract work being done using the largest of the two gigantic hangers, but I would presume that any large aircraft landing at Loring would come in under visual flight rules.
There is no reason to maintain expensive electronic equipment for an airfield that gets next to no traffic. The runways themselves were marked with a large "X" at the threshholds that would indicate to any approaching aircraft that the airfield was closed to traffic.
As far as any underground facilities were concerned, I saw none, and asked to see none. But I would imagine that they are empty of any equipment at this point, IF anything was left behind by the USAF when they moved out.
I would imagine that the cost of a new top security Federal detention center would run up into the hundreds of millions of dollars. THAT would have been the climate shock, and the shock would have been a good one for Aroostook County and all of Maine.
|
|

02-09-2009, 03:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argyle, Maine
11,898 posts, read 6,972,296 times
Reputation: 2905
|
|
|
I do not foresee the Feds building any new military bases stateside anytime soon.
Maine does have a lot of military retirees. Bringing their pensions into the area.
|
|

02-09-2009, 03:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Well Downeast
1,030 posts, read 422,645 times
Reputation: 412
|
|
|
I would NOT be surprised if you found something inactive but ready to go active underground up there. I remember a friend finding an old BOMARC site once that had fresh yellow paint and manuals "upstairs" in the silo sheds. From the photos he had it looked ready to go operational in a few days waiting for weapons. Lord knows what's underground there. It might take the gov't a bit to ensure "detainees" (more like enemy combattants) didn't tunnel into something good.
|
|

02-09-2009, 04:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argyle, Maine
11,898 posts, read 6,972,296 times
Reputation: 2905
|
|
|
The hangers at NAS Brunswick could easily be converted, into a penal facility.
|
|

02-09-2009, 08:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hidin' out on the Mexican border;about to move to the Canadian border
716 posts, read 308,507 times
Reputation: 287
|
|
|
Acadian has made two good points. One, that the feds wouldn't leave any equipment behind that they don't want falling into civilian--or other--hands. Second, the cost of refitting an old air base into a detention facility of any kind would be exorbitant. In fact, by the time a proper facility was planned and executed, Obama would be out of office, even if he serves a second term.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|