|

03-09-2009, 01:54 PM
|
|
"Standing On the Side of Love"
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maine
15,224 posts, read 3,228,142 times
Reputation: 15741
|
|
|
I wasnt going to "wade in"....but I totally agree with tcracky.....the draining of the aquifer is the same type of degredation as the sludge spill in Kentucky that destroyed private property and poisoned wells.....sometimes the "common good" is just that.....to protect the wholesomeness of the enviornment for all the people...especially when the assault on the community is from an international corporation attempting to overrule the will of the people of the community.
|
|

03-09-2009, 02:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Are we there yet? I gotta go."
(set 11 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Way South, ME
1,599 posts, read 640,787 times
Reputation: 926
|
|
|
We New Englanders are lucky and take for granted all our natural resources, especially water , that occur in such abundance here. Notwithstanding environmental conditions could change and we could be in a "water war" like North Carolina, Georgia ans South Carolina. I say better to insure residents access to vital needs in law before the resource is compromised by something unforeseen.
|
|

03-09-2009, 04:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Well Downeast
1,001 posts, read 398,966 times
Reputation: 401
|
|
|
I don't think we take anything for granted in Maine. At least theat's the general concensus in Wash. Cty. IMO. I think there are people on both sides (industry v. ecology) that have a hidden agenda. Up this way we're a bit warey of both of them. Neither is a very trustworthy bunch.
Industry and business on the whole want profits which is the idea of the whole thing and eco-extremists want nothing but themselves and all things natural. I remember during the "Great Salmon Wars" in '97-'99 at a hearing in Ellsworth a guy stood at the podium proclaiming that he3'd rather see one salmon in the Maine rivers than any people in teh entire state. Even the Sierra Club rep took in a deep gulp of breath. There has to be a middle ground.
|
|

03-09-2009, 10:44 PM
|
|
ready for any thing
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: some where maine
1,974 posts, read 936,792 times
Reputation: 1075
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by truthseeker2012
Today the citizens of Shapleigh, Maine voted at a special town meeting to pass a groundbreaking Rights-Based Ordinance, 114 for and 66 against. This revolutionary ordinance give its citizens the right to local self-governance and gives rights to ecosystems but denies the rights of personhood to corporations. This ordinance allows the citizens to protect their groundwater resources, putting it in a common trust to be used for the benefit of its residents. Shapleigh is the first community in Maine to pass such an ordinance, which extends rights to nature, however, the Ordinance Review Committee in Wells, Maine is considering passing one in their town.
BuzzFlash.net - Progressive News and Commentary with an Attitude | Fight Ignorance: Read BuzzFlash
|
this is all well n good but whats stoping the big corporations from moving to the next town over.if it uses the same aquifer they can still suck the water out.this should be a state wide ban.sure every one likes bttl water but at what cost.just my 2 cents
|
|

03-09-2009, 11:52 PM
|
|
Eddie Van Halen Wanna Be
Status:
"It's all about Eruption....baby"
(set 13 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Deer Park, WA
653 posts, read 299,252 times
Reputation: 416
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RANGER.101ST
this is all well n good but whats stoping the big corporations from moving to the next town over.if it uses the same aquifer they can still suck the water out.this should be a state wide ban.sure every one likes bttl water but at what cost.just my 2 cents
|
Hey Ranger, I always like to get your two cents worth, and I agree with you on this one. From what I have researched Nestle has made itself a royal pain in the petunia around there. The home owner should be able to drink water from a well on there land without wondering if it will be there in the morning.
|
|

03-10-2009, 12:13 AM
|
|
ready for any thing
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: some where maine
1,974 posts, read 936,792 times
Reputation: 1075
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankratt
Hey Ranger, I always like to get your two cents worth, and I agree with you on this one. From what I have researched Nestle has made itself a royal pain in the petunia around there. The home owner should be able to drink water from a well on there land without wondering if it will be there in the morning.
|
dont make sence to me the state will regulate the he!! out of the company's that keep maine people working. but will do nothing about the ones sucking it dry.
|
|

03-10-2009, 07:16 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Are we there yet? I gotta go."
(set 11 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Way South, ME
1,599 posts, read 640,787 times
Reputation: 926
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RANGER.101ST
this is all well n good but whats stoping the big corporations from moving to the next town over.if it uses the same aquifer they can still suck the water out.this should be a state wide ban.sure every one likes bttl water but at what cost.just my 2 cents
|
Personally, since water is vital for life, I think there should br law that all fresh water belongs to the resident people of the state, whereby voter referendums would be required for outside groups to have wholesale access to it.
|
|

03-10-2009, 01:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Are we there yet? I gotta go."
(set 11 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Way South, ME
1,599 posts, read 640,787 times
Reputation: 926
|
|
|
I just saw that Newfield residents are publicly voicing the same concerns. They brought up an interesting point that Maine residents, especially in forested areas need to have ample water supplies in the event of a major regional forest fire as in 1947.
|
|

03-10-2009, 01:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maine
412 posts, read 310,509 times
Reputation: 324
|
|
|
anyone know how many people would lose their jobs if poland spring water closed down? And how many others jobs would then be affected?
As with most things, there needs to be a balance. Nothing wrong with companies trying to make money off the land. Farmers? Lumber? Or should those evil companies also be banned?
|
|

03-10-2009, 01:59 PM
|
|
Botda Farm :D
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine
6,527 posts, read 2,671,505 times
Reputation: 6725
|
|
|
With growing world populations, water is the "new oil". Water rights are going to become much more important in coming years.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|