Quote:
Originally Posted by emsgoof
I don't believe it
Is this written in English? How would I not get a good understanding of people in PG County when I'm going into their house day after day (not over the phone... do you even understand what a firefighter or paramedic is?!?)
Yes, thank you for proving my point. It's always the terrible white man to blame. It can never be a black person's fault. You've also gone on in the past about the United States being the most racist country in the world, but it's the "minorities" (mainly blacks) that push the issue and keep it at the front of the discussion. Only here do you hear about "African Americans" or "Mexican Americans" or anything like that. How often do you hear about "African British" or "Chinese French"? You want to talk about racism, fine, but don't whine about it when people throw it back at you. Are you saying that the violence and crime I see in PG County doesn't exist? (To paraphrase what you said above).
You want to talk about people being racist? How about this?
It's ok for you to say it, but once I change it, I'm a racists SOB...
|
Interesting tactic, but its inherently wrong. The definition of "Racism" (in this sense) MUST include at least two parties, a priviledged, and an unprivileged. It is the belief that the priveleged group is superior based on racial traits. Historically, and in todays context, the priveleged group has been whites, and the underpriveleged, most other minorities. Like it or not, the concept itself was "created" to favor the "underdog", be they black, mexican, Jewish, etc... So when using the concept of racism, white and black CANNOT be freely interchanged. (Now bigotry, discrimination, prejudice, and all other ignorances are an entirely different story...)
Going back to what lscalder was saying, although I do not agree with or support everything she says, in this particular instance, I see the statements she made regarding her children being able to see black success as exceptable. BECAUSE of the history of African Americans in the US , BECAUSE of the stigmas associated with their communities, BECAUSE of the innacurate, biased portrayals of the national media, BECAUSE of the historical (and present day) context. On the other hand, when you subsitute it with "white", while I dont think anyone can ligitimately disagree with you wanting the same thing, BECAUSE they are and historically have been a priveledged majority, it puts people on alert, causes them to raise a brow. Because statements like that have such a strong correlation to overtly racist sentiments expressed in the past. Again, you have to look at everything in context, you can't just ignore history. Everything has a starting point.