Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2014, 07:44 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,218,208 times
Reputation: 26422

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayrandom View Post
Common Forms of Housing Discrimination - MassLegalHelp

I think you must have missed the half dozen posts where this was mentioned. The claim is that by offering the apartment through a broker that the landlord's right to refuse to rent to children disappears. It's not clear if that is true and no authoritative source has been provided to settle such a dispute.
Yes, it is here Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) which the OP posted earlier.

It is an exception to that protection and the landlord should have done his research. The broker sounds like an idiot with a big mouth anyway who is not properly representing his client. Mistake 1) listing this rental with a broker, Mistake 2) Broker failing to show the property and yapping about roommates and families to a person inquiring about it. It was unprofessional of both so in that way, I don't empathize with them so much, although the regulations are tough on landlords. Still I think OP should just move on and find a suitable apartment.

Also, the laws are always changing and tightening, so at any time people who are already in the rental business can be blindsided by major expenses and jumping through hoops. Some of the newer laws are kind of crazy and damaging to landlords and renters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2014, 10:38 AM
 
392 posts, read 919,448 times
Reputation: 335
I agree that it is not a level playing field, and there is discrimination going on, however not in this particular case with a 2 unit house. There is more leeway for landlords who own 2-4 unit buildings, if landlord resides in one of the units. And it is understandable, IMHO. If apartment complex in question would be a bigger one (or much bigger one), than yes, totally get after them in terms of discrimination.
I think that OP is unhappy that this particular (very nice? and well priced? conveniently located?) unit is getting away from them, because landlord doesn't want them.
Even though I am parent myself (have 3 kids), I personally don't think that small time landlords are committing a crime when they don't want to have tenants with children. It's not only noise etc, but a huge liability as well. Would I be frustrated if that happened to me? You bet! Would I feel offended? Discriminated against? Nope. But it's me. Even if I "won" the unit through court, how would I live there, knowing that landlord doesn't like having my kids around?
I agree with what miu said earlier, it was my choice to have kids, and it is somebody else's choice not to have any of their own or even around.

On another note, I had friends looking for a rental, they had a 5 y.o. child. They just said their child is already 6...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 10:46 AM
 
392 posts, read 919,448 times
Reputation: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
Yes, it is here Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) which the OP posted earlier.

It is an exception to that protection and the landlord should have done his research. The broker sounds like an idiot with a big mouth anyway who is not properly representing his client. Mistake 1) listing this rental with a broker, Mistake 2) Broker failing to show the property and yapping about roommates and families to a person inquiring about it. It was unprofessional of both so in that way, I don't empathize with them so much, although the regulations are tough on landlords. Still I think OP should just move on and find a suitable apartment.

Also, the laws are always changing and tightening, so at any time people who are already in the rental business can be blindsided by major expenses and jumping through hoops. Some of the newer laws are kind of crazy and damaging to landlords and renters.
well said!
cant rep you again so I just publicly agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 08:51 PM
 
44 posts, read 77,847 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by tikaram View Post
I agree that it is not a level playing field, and there is discrimination going on, however not in this particular case with a 2 unit house. There is more leeway for landlords who own 2-4 unit buildings, if landlord resides in one of the units. And it is understandable, IMHO. If apartment complex in question would be a bigger one (or much bigger one), than yes, totally get after them in terms of discrimination.
..
Interestingly, the complaint that I filed that ended up to Attorney General was about a 3 unit home and the landlord lived in the house. He used a broker to advertise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 09:01 PM
 
44 posts, read 77,847 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
Interestingly enough, for us buying a two-family house in Newton was much cheaper than buying a single family or three-family house. we didn't make any profit on it. The monthly rent was only to defray the mortgage payments, building maintenance, and high property taxes on the whole property.
Renting out the unit allowed you to afford a larger mortgage and live in Newton with it's high property taxes, and you didn't have to work extra 20 hours/week to cover the difference. It allowed you to make the choice to live where you would otherwise could not afford to live. I would call that a profit, maybe not monetary but in other ways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
Anyway, I'm so tired of so many people crying victim and protected class. For some reason, they seem in the majority these days.
Well, I would be embarrassed to write that if I were you. Do you have the same attitude about disabled people, veterans with mental health issues because they were in combat to protect your right to complain about people crying victim, and people on section 8 housing, that you know nothing about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2014, 06:21 AM
 
Location: MA
675 posts, read 1,700,470 times
Reputation: 929
Also, unless any of you sprang from the skull of Zeus fully grown, all of us have once been a protected class (children)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2014, 07:01 AM
 
19,626 posts, read 12,218,208 times
Reputation: 26422
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribechamy View Post
Also, unless any of you sprang from the skull of Zeus fully grown, all of us have once been a protected class (children)
No, some of us are just old. I remember when there were adults only apartment complexes, not limited to 55+, just no kids allowed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2014, 08:13 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,769 posts, read 40,163,673 times
Reputation: 18100
Quote:
Originally Posted by lexi12 View Post
Renting out the unit allowed you to afford a larger mortgage and live in Newton with it's high property taxes, and you didn't have to work extra 20 hours/week to cover the difference. It allowed you to make the choice to live where you would otherwise could not afford to live. I would call that a profit, maybe not monetary but in other ways.
Actually, in the beginning it was a joint effort with my youngest sister. And the building was a "handyman special". Twenty one years ago, it was the cheapest option for a real estate purchase. Many times single family homes are generally priced higher than two and three-families. And at the time, three families were at a premium because the sellers figured that the next owner would turn them into condominiums and they wanted a piece of the action. Yes, my two-family went up in value, but honestly (and I've this before) I'd much rather the value not have risen since I wanted to just stay put in the house and not move. Plus, in the twenty-one years I've lived here, we've never ever used the Newton Public School system. So the bulk of our property taxes are spent on other people's children and paying off that stupid money pit that is the new Newton North High School.

And how did you know what my work weeks are? I frequently work six and seven days a week. I always have one main full time job and I am on call with several other companies. My car is 20 years old. I don't own a smartphone or a GPS for my car. But my buying power is increased by NOT having children that I didn't want anyway.
Quote:
Well, I would be embarrassed to write that if I were you. Do you have the same attitude about disabled people, veterans with mental health issues because they were in combat to protect your right to complain about people crying victim, and people on section 8 housing, that you know nothing about?
I am not at all embarrassed to write what I did. In traditional Chinese culture, we turn to the family for support in times of hardship, and it would be an embarrassment to sign up for welfare or Section 8 housing. And if someone had a mental illness in our family, it's private and our own business and not anyone else's to deal with. And we wouldn't go demanding a business or landlord build handicap ramps for a relative. When I was five, my parents were so poor in NYC that for several months us kids slept on a mattress and they slept on the boxspring. Growing up in MA, my parents had a small furniture business that kept them working seven days a week. In the beginning, what my dad sold during store hours would be delivered that night by him in his van. When I was in high school, a few times I would go with him as his helper. His employees always had company health insurance. So I think that I know all about hard work, extra jobs and living frugally, even with kids.

In regards to Section 8 housing, well all the people I know on Section 8 are baby mommas with lots of personal dramas in their lives. What I really don't get is why they have several kids out of wedlock by the same guy floating in and out of their lives. Getting pregnant does not make a bad boy type guy want to marry the mother. And people without kids have great difficulty getting into the program. So yes, I have zero sympathy for baby mommas and the welfare and Section 8 programs.

As to war veteran's with mental health issues... where have I posted about that? If anything, in case I haven't said it yet, I do think that it's terrible that our government doesn't take care of our Vietnam vets better and resists acknowledging diagnoses of PTSD. Many homeless people are vets with mental illnesses and who don't want to live indoors. And I do have sympathy for them, but what does that have to do with my second unit in my Newton house? Do you want me to rent it it to a homeless vet? What does this have to do with the OP with her family and kids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2014, 09:09 AM
 
44 posts, read 77,847 times
Reputation: 29
Well, veterans (like children and families with children) are a protected class and you said that "many people cry victim and protected class". You seem to dismiss children as protected class and I was asking you about some of the other categories of protected class citizens, that might not be so obvious to everybody.

No reason to get defensive about your choices of how to live, where to live, and how you grew up. We all have different stories and cultural biases. What I am saying is that we need to pay attention to the dominant culture and the laws governing them (LEAD law!), regardless of where we come from. You make generalizations and dismiss other people's life stories without knowing much about it. To say "people on section 8 housing are baby mommas" - well, it might be true, but you don't know if those baby mommas grew up in abusive families, around drugs or childhood trauma, without any guidance and support from their parents. They might be doing their best, you don't know them so you can't judge. The government deemed them worthy of financial assistance, so that's that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2014, 09:20 AM
 
44 posts, read 77,847 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
And how did you know what my work weeks are?
I have no idea. But you're saying that you needed the extra income from renting to cover the mortgage and taxes. Had you not had a rental, you would have had to work more hours, no? I didn't say "you would have to work 20 hours". I said "EXTRA 20 hours". Rough approximation, I have no idea what you do and it's not relevant anyway.

But yeah, this thread now has nothing to do with the OP's question, I agree with you on that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top