|

11-06-2008, 08:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
863 posts, read 607,925 times
Reputation: 434
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustmove
The local economy is driven by state taxes, zoning and regulation.
|
A good economy will not lower Massachusetts real estate prices, it will raise them! It happened in the 80's with all the high-tech boom along route 128. Massachusetts real estate is high, because it has a diverse economy and it is a desirable place to live. Real estate in the Boston metro area may simmer, but will never stagnate. If the taxes are high, people will have to deal with it, if they don't, there are plenty of people who will take their place.
|
|

11-06-2008, 08:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westwood, MA
436 posts, read 316,148 times
Reputation: 203
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustmove
The local economy is driven by state taxes, zoning and regulation.
|
The local economy is driven by local business. Local business is affected by state taxes, zoning, and regulation, but to say they are the dominant forces in a particular market is drastic oversimplification. Certainly for low margin industries like commoditized manufacturing, things like taxes, zoning, and regulation can be dominant; other, typically high-tier industries like finance and research aren't constrained in that way and often locate in expensive, over-zoned areas because a critical mass of others in that industry are located in the area. New York City for finance or the Bay Area for computers are two prime examples. Even things like allowing gay marriage can have a positive effect in attracting or keeping particular industries.
|
|

11-07-2008, 07:53 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
673 posts, read 427,741 times
Reputation: 159
|
|
|
The attitude that MA can tax and regulate as much as they want and not affect business is dangerously ignorant.
|
|

11-07-2008, 08:07 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Massachusetts
1,735 posts, read 1,310,671 times
Reputation: 865
|
|
|
The last several posts have gone way off topic from the original subject of the thread.
TOS:
"Stay on topic. Attempts to hi-jack threads by switching topics or going off topic will be deleted and infractions issued. This is not a chat room - when people hi-jack threads by posting messages that are of interest to only few people, the threads often stop being useful discussions of initial topics."
|
|

11-07-2008, 04:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
148 posts, read 153,582 times
Reputation: 30
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangodoodles
I'd like to thank all of you for your responses. For me personally, it's hard to imagine a state where there is limited opposition to equal rights. From what all of you have said, Massachusetts is such a place. Anyway, I asked because I'm so disheartened with California right now and I need to apply to law school in a two years time so I'm sort of thinking ahead. I am not gay but I support gay rights and I'm concerned about raising children in a state where one can literally write something discriminatory and unconstitutional into the state constitution. I don't say these things to start an argument but because those are my beliefs and I'd have a pretty hard time saying to my kids, "Your cousin couldn't get married just because people don't think he should have the right in California." Again, thanks for all the responses, I now feel very good about potentially heading out to the east coast for law school and if I like it I may stick around. 
|
Even though the majority of California voted Yes on 8, 77% of the city that you live in (San Francisco) voted No on 8. You live in the most tolerant city in California, if not the most tolerant city in the U.S. So if you raise your kids in San Francisco, they are not going to see biggotry and ignorance.
|
|

11-07-2008, 06:37 PM
|
|
It's all about the buttah.....
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sittin' on the rocks at the bay...
18,254 posts, read 1,227,428 times
Reputation: 13230
|
|
|
The most irritating thing about gay marriage in Massachusetts is the idea the liberal judges approved it. They took away our most basic right as citizens of the Commonwealth... the right to vote. I think gay people should be able to be as miserable as us hetero's are in marriage. Fair's fair after all! lol
|
|

11-07-2008, 08:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco, California
2,022 posts, read 976,193 times
Reputation: 495
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoastalMaine
The most irritating thing about gay marriage in Massachusetts is the idea the liberal judges approved it. They took away our most basic right as citizens of the Commonwealth... the right to vote. I think gay people should be able to be as miserable as us hetero's are in marriage. Fair's fair after all! lol
|
I respect your opinion but I'd rather not get into an argument about the branches of government, I'm kind of burned out after all of this fighting in California. But I appreciate that you seem to support gay marriage. 
|
|

11-07-2008, 08:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco, California
2,022 posts, read 976,193 times
Reputation: 495
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivabigpapi
Even though the majority of California voted Yes on 8, 77% of the city that you live in (San Francisco) voted No on 8. You live in the most tolerant city in California, if not the most tolerant city in the U.S. So if you raise your kids in San Francisco, they are not going to see biggotry and ignorance.
|
Yeah, that's what I love about this city. But I worry about what else majority rule can write into the state constitution. The passage of the prop may be appealed on the basis that a simple majority passed a constitutional amendment which may or may not be legal but I'd rather live in a place where it isn't up in the air all the time. For instance, another prop was about whether or not minors had to get permission from their parents to get an abortion and it has been on the ballot three out of the past four years and it has failed every time but it's always close. Even if we voted again in two years and gay marriage prevailed, I'd wonder if maybe that would change the following year if it was on the ballot again. So, while I love that San Francisco is so liberal, it's the state of California that I worry about.
|
|

11-08-2008, 07:26 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westwood, MA
436 posts, read 316,148 times
Reputation: 203
|
|
|
The chances are almost zero. Politicians don't want to touch the issue with a ten foot pole and they've figured out how not to. I do think that if the amendment made it to the ballot it would be soundly defeated, but I don't think we'll ever get that chance.
|
|

11-08-2008, 11:07 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Francisco, California
2,022 posts, read 976,193 times
Reputation: 495
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayrandom
The chances are almost zero. Politicians don't want to touch the issue with a ten foot pole and they've figured out how not to. I do think that if the amendment made it to the ballot it would be soundly defeated, but I don't think we'll ever get that chance.
|
Defeated in a good way right? Like in California yes meant no on gay marriage and no meant yes on gay marriage? Just clarifying because sometimes these things get confusing. But if you mean that gay marriage would stay legal then that is awesome. It's nice to see that it has been around and people who may not support it may have even gotten used to it. 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|