U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.

bawac34618

Status: "HATE WINS!!!" (set 14 days ago)

Senior Member

Visitor Messages (Public)

Showing Public Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
  1. Traveling_Cipher
    03-30-2017 07:24 PM - permalink
    Traveling_Cipher
    Sorry, I've enabled PM now in case you want to answer back. Still new here and all.
  2. KS_Referee
    01-29-2017 09:14 PM - permalink
    KS_Referee
    part 2 of 2

    I noticed a lot of ignorance on that thread from non-libertarians. Some even went as far as to claim we want no laws. WTF? Why would they post on a topic they are completely ignorant on? Oh wait... That's the majority of CD posters in general.

    What I find is when I am actually sitting there, guiding someone in how the Libertarian thought process and logic goes, they appear to agree. As soon as I back off and let them take the reigns again, their statist desires always take over.

    But that's just MY opinion, fwiw.
  3. KS_Referee
    01-29-2017 09:08 PM - permalink
    KS_Referee
    Re: Convincing social conservatives to see the social libertarian perspective
    Great post, great questions

    I have tried on numerous occasions, and even people who aren't die hard Christians seem to have difficulty with not being able to impose THEIR will, morality and dictates upon another if what they are doing doesn't encroach upon the rights or property of another. My observations have shown this isn't limited to conservatives though. I've seen it wide spread including liberals and of all people, some who call themselves Libertarians.

    I believe the only crimes should be malum in se. There should be no malum prohibitum crimes as law anywhere. All malum in se crimes would be a crime regardless of whether or not there was a law because malum in se is when one person's action or inaction encroaches upon the rights or property of another. Malum prohibitum is prohibiting something simply because some "don't like" whatever that something is.

    end of part 1 of 2

About Me

  • About bawac34618
    Location
    Trumpville
    Marital/Relationship status
    Not answered
  • Status updates
    HATE WINS!!! - 06-04-2018 10:11 AM
    Under His Eye - 07-26-2017 02:01 PM
    Wake Up America!! - 05-10-2017 04:40 PM
    Tired of winnering yet? - 03-24-2017 04:42 PM
    Where has my country gone? - 03-10-2017 05:26 PM
    Impeach!!! - 03-10-2017 05:25 PM
    Impeach!!! - 02-15-2017 03:53 PM
    Stand Up To Trump!!!! - 02-01-2017 10:51 PM

Statistics

Total Posts
Visitor Messages (Public)
Blog
General Information
  • Last Activity: Today 06:26 PM
  • Join Date: 03-09-2015
Top Forums
  • Politics and Other Controversies: 3534
  • General U.S.: 548
  • City vs. City: 500
  • Elections: 344
  • Psychology: 268

Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 12 of 12

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 PM.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top