U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.


Senior Member

Visitor Messages (Public)

Showing Public Visitor Messages 1 to 7 of 7
  1. ContrarianEcon
  2. ContrarianEcon
    03-10-2015 08:32 PM - permalink
    Setting out to prove it was CO2 without looking at the problem as a whole and understanding the dynamic of it. How many times have you guys said I don't understand it? I understand it just fine. All of it. The emotions and the logic of it. Where it came from and where it is going. Lable me what you want. I have ASD the old thing was Asperger's, Savontism. I was called Frankenstein as a kid. Bring on the names. Troll? I laugh at it.

    I'm correct in my logic. Al Gore isn't deal with it.
  3. ContrarianEcon
    03-10-2015 08:31 PM - permalink
    Soot started it. the feedback loop of warmer water adding moisture to the air kept it going forwards, CO2 as an also ran. You guys just have to much emotion invested into the CO2 thing to look at this one.

    The emotional response. It is wrong to heat up the place because it will do all this damage. Well take a dispassionate look at it. What happens when it warms up? what happens when it cools off? What is the less painful path to take?
  4. ContrarianEcon
    03-10-2015 08:30 PM - permalink
    Let us take apart Al Gore's an incontinent truth. What he said he did was to look at what was happening in his lifetime and extrapolate back from there. This is not a bad starting point. But the movie was designed to elicit a strong emotional response. It has done this. There are now fanatical followers of the AGW movement. The problem with strong emotions about a subject is that it clouds your judgment. It makes you less objective. I watched the movie, I thought about it, I questioned what I saw, I reviewed what I knew. I came to the conclusion that AGW started with a soot input and that it continued with a feedback loop off of the initial heat input from the soot's effects. This is a non emotion clouded judgment.
  5. ContrarianEcon
    03-10-2015 08:29 PM - permalink
    Is that a conspiracy theory?
    And when I quote the person that founded the climate change place at East Anglia, All wound up. Aether theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Something to think about A general consensus in science doesn't mean that they are correct. As time goes on there are fewer errors being found, but...
    As do I. Saying that paper is wrong because the person that wrote it is a paid hack for the oil companies is just like saying that the paper is wrong because it is a government conspiracy. I use the papers you approve of to argue my points.
  6. ContrarianEcon
  7. ContrarianEcon
    02-25-2015 11:22 AM - permalink
    What you have had with increases in the minimum wage are an increase by congress and then the dollar value staying the same as the purchasing power of that dollar value is eroded by inflation, until they go the next round. So there would be no long term increase in the economic

About Me

  • About ContrarianEcon
    ZIP Code
    Marital/Relationship status
    Not answered


Total Posts
Visitor Messages (Public)
General Information
  • Last Activity: 02-26-2018 05:30 PM
  • Join Date: 03-11-2014
Top Forums
  • Politics and Other Controversies: 2196
  • Economics: 1400
  • Investing: 154
  • Current Events: 27
  • Elections: 6


Showing Friends 1 to 3 of 3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top