U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 01-13-2012, 01:36 PM
 
4,101 posts, read 2,643,814 times
Reputation: 1625

Advertisements

Detroit 9.5 million

Lansing 9.4 million

Flint 8.1 million

Saginaw 7.7 million

Grand Rapids 4.4 million
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
159 posts, read 278,612 times
Reputation: 69
Can you be a little more vague here Identured Servant...................
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2012, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
159 posts, read 278,612 times
Reputation: 69
I thought that was kinda funny; did you???????
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2012, 10:20 PM
 
7,238 posts, read 5,012,275 times
Reputation: 5316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indentured Servant View Post
Detroit 9.5 million

Lansing 9.4 million

Flint 8.1 million

Saginaw 7.7 million

Grand Rapids 4.4 million
Yes, a lot of people live in this area...

I don't see the point of your post however.

The only thing that matters for all intents and purposes is the Census measurements.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 05:43 AM
 
4,101 posts, read 2,643,814 times
Reputation: 1625
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
Yes, a lot of people live in this area...

I don't see the point of your post however.

The only thing that matters for all intents and purposes is the Census measurements.
Actually marketing cares a great deal about such numbers. For example, the viability of a professional sports team is often determined by how many people live in a given radius.

Most of the cities in Michigan get their high numbers from including the Detroit area......except Grand Rapids. The 100 mile radius population of Grand Rapids is about equal to the 100 mile radius populaton of Minneapolis.

This probably is only of interest to demographic nerds or people of marketing backgrounds.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Your computer screen.
5,947 posts, read 4,617,149 times
Reputation: 5753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indentured Servant View Post
Actually marketing cares a great deal about such numbers. For example, the viability of a professional sports team is often determined by how many people live in a given radius.
So Lansing is (almost) as eligible for a professional sports team as Detroit?

No, I don't think that's how it works.

Looks more like information on the best place to drop a nuclear bomb.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
1,635 posts, read 971,416 times
Reputation: 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indentured Servant View Post
Detroit 9.5 million

Lansing 9.4 million

Flint 8.1 million

Saginaw 7.7 million

Grand Rapids 4.4 million
Anybody who has lived in Lansing knows that there are a ton of people within 100 miles. In fact, I might argue that Lansing has a larger population within 100 miles than Detroit does, because undoubtedly some of the people within 100 miles of Detroit live on the other side of Lake Erie in the Cleveland metro area. That's more than 100 miles when driven. Basically the entire state south of US-10, except the eastern and western fringes such as Port Huron and Benton Harbor, respectively, are within 100 miles of Lansing. Also within 100 miles would be far northwestern Ohio and northeastern Indiana, which would include the Toledo area. That might be why there are a lot of distribution centers in Lansing.

I'm surprised that 100 miles from Saginaw is only 400,000 lower than 100 miles from Flint. I'd think that Saginaw would lose the Toledo area and pick up sparsely populated areas to the north. Maybe being a little further west makes a difference.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 04:49 PM
 
7,718 posts, read 2,593,522 times
Reputation: 2381
It looks like Detroit doesn't get the benefit of Windsor Canada and its suburbs?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2012, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Michigan
3,215 posts, read 2,715,977 times
Reputation: 2279
Actually, if you include Canada, then about as far as London, Ontario is where the 100-mile cutoff would be. Guesstimating that it'd be about 900,000 plus or minus. So in total, Detroit's 100 mile population would actually be 10.4 million. Plus or minus.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2012, 02:02 AM
 
483 posts, read 526,199 times
Reputation: 326
This seems to be a quirky statistic, with little real relevance.

I suspect very few people would think of Benton Harbor as a huge population center - but I bet you it (or some town near it) would lead Michigan in the "Hundred Mile Radius" contest.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2011 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top